We’ve had enough of digital monopolies and surveillance capitalism. We want an alternative world that works for everyone, just like the original intention of the web and net.
We seek a world of open platforms and protocols with real choices of applications and services for people. We care about privacy, transparency and autonomy. Our tools and organisations should fundamentally be accountable and resilient.
I haven't found your session on youtube, so apologies if I'm adding redundant info here. In the late 90s I was playing with the concept of a distributed search engine, but due to lack of time it just remained a 'future work' idea in a chapter of my degree's final year project report. If you have time to waste: http://ktorn.com/prog/iseeker/summary.html Since then a few implementations of p2p SEs appeared, most notably YaCy: http://yacy.net/en/ I did try YaCy a while back and it did work, except it was way too slow for consumer adoption. That was almost 10 years ago, no idea if it's any faster now, but I doubt it. In terms of UX, latency is probably one of the biggest barriers to adoption with most p2p implementations of anything. I switched from Altavista to Google back in the early 2000s not because the results were more relevant, but because it was so much faster. Filipe Farinha On 18/10/2015 14:47, Francis Irving wrote: > "a very large project, requiring the cooperation of at least 5 servers" > is a great change! > > These days we often have 5 servers (small, virtual, on EC2) almost > whimsically just on one small project... > > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015, at 06:56 AM, Hugh Barnard wrote: >> Hi folks >> This: https://twitter.com/alicemazzy/status/655306196128280576 is what >> a web search engine hardware configuration looked like in 1996. That's >> probably around the first couple of years of the web. >> Best regards Hugh >> >> -- >> http://www.hughbarnard.org >> http://www.twitter.com/hughbarnard >> http://www.big-wave-heuristics.com/<http://www.hackney-environment-network.org.uk/> >