We’ve had enough of digital monopolies and surveillance capitalism. We want an alternative world that works for everyone, just like the original intention of the web and net.

We seek a world of open platforms and protocols with real choices of applications and services for people. We care about privacy, transparency and autonomy. Our tools and organisations should fundamentally be accountable and resilient.


Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-02 12:52:36 (6 years 7 mons 21:39:00 ago)
Thought of another point about this…

Decentralization doesn’t necessarily imply that all peers are of equal size, just that all things have equal opportunity to be peers.

That being said, I think the current network deployment pattern pretty much guarantees the domination of the ecosystem by massive players by writing inequality into the network topology itself. Even if a more democratic many-smaller-players solution could win in the ecosystem and even in the market place, it can’t right now because it is too technically challenging to deploy.

> Network routing is certainly one important aspect of decentralization.  
> But suppose Google now served Search & Gmail via a ZeroTierOne Earth
> Address.  I'd think they would again quickly be able to create a rather
> centralized traffic point within the network topology because of: