Login

Redecentralize

We’ve had enough of digital monopolies and surveillance capitalism. We want an alternative world that works for everyone, just like the original intention of the web and net.

We seek a world of open platforms and protocols with real choices of applications and services for people. We care about privacy, transparency and autonomy. Our tools and organisations should fundamentally be accountable and resilient.

Home

Parent
Richard Marr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] GNU Internet Stack / youbroketheinternet.org 2014-01-05 11:35:55 (7 years 3 mons 22:31:00 ago)
I don't *think* it's relevant. Could be wrong though.

This project enables UDP as a replacement for TCP to try and squeeze out some performance gains (TCP provides some reliability checks that UDP doesn't care about and those checks cost time). They'd then run HTTP and HTTPS at the application level as before... IP+UDP+HTTP rather than IP+TCP+HTTP.


On 1 January 2014 11:50, MikedePlume <mike@mikedeplume.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:42 +0000, Francis Irving wrote:
> My instinct is that long game, they're right and HTTP is fatally
> flawed.
>
> It is a fundamentally centralizing protocol - the domain in a URL is
> both the name of the resource *and* the place you go to get that
> resource.
>
> Short term is another matter. There are lots of incremental things
> people can and should do now.
>

I really can't tell, but this might be relevant here.  Can anyone
interpret the short-form intro?

https://github.com/InstantWebP2P/node-httpp/wiki/An-introduction-to-node-httpp

Mike S.




--
Richard Marr
: