Login

Redecentralize

We’ve had enough of digital monopolies and surveillance capitalism. We want an alternative world that works for everyone, just like the original intention of the web and net.

We seek a world of open platforms and protocols with real choices of applications and services for people. We care about privacy, transparency and autonomy. Our tools and organisations should fundamentally be accountable and resilient.

Home
Robert Tischer [LibreList] RE: [redecentralize] Check out Hiveware's decentralized platform (as in no servers) 2015-09-02 13:49:55
each visitor. Second-hand bookstore are not illegal. Public libraries either. "Intellectual property" is a confusing legal construct that covers anything from authorship rights to patent laws. It would be akin to say that a fence, a kitchen, and a book belong to the same "physical property /...\ dependent on them" so may I please be allowed to discuss my technology as part of the current P2P diaspora? My technology is anything but proprietary in the traditional sense. Just because I maintain that I own it, doesn't mean that it is non-seeable or non-usable /...\ without software interlocking controls (ie, just the barebones library keeps me from changing their code). In fact, I really don't want to know anything about how they wrote the code because I need to concentrate on writing my Hiveware code. BTW, I wouldn't dream of using so-called
David Geib [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-12 20:23:47
supposed to know whether to trust some third party before signing it. That's the huge fail with the existing CAs. They'll sign anything. Moxie Marlinspike has had a number of relevant things to say about that. > That manual intervention must by definition take place over some other /...\ sense that's true, because if the network is totally compromised, meaning no communication can take place between anyone, then you can't do anything in the direction of fixing it without having some external network to use to coordinate. But that's only a problem before bootstrap /...\ will work against the whole of it. It's like the Unix Way: Make everything simple and modular so that everything can interface with anything, that way if something isn't working you can swap it out with something else. Then as long as you have [anything] that can perform
Louise Ishka [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-03 08:38:06
first class deployment method into > arkOS. > > Running services securely sandboxed could greatly improve security, > not to say that almost _anything_ can be made to run in a Docker > container. > > -- Martin > > Am Do, 2. Jan, 2014 um 7:16 schrieb Eric Mill /...\ heard of, things >>  that would play into this sort of model of Easier Self-Hosting. >> I haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie >>  together a bunch of the technologies people here are working /...\ involved in the distributed systems community here, though >>> mostly as an enthusiast (I'm not implementing paxos or >>> anything). >>> >>> Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this >>> community goes
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 23:56:09
about integrating Docker as a first class deployment method into arkOS. Running services securely sandboxed could greatly improve security, not to say that almost _anything_ can be made to run in a Docker container. -- Martin Am Do, 2. Jan, 2014 um 7:16 schrieb Eric Mill <eric@konklone.com /...\ heard of, things > that would play into this sort of model of Easier Self-Hosting. I > haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie > together a bunch of the technologies people here are working on. > > I could also imagine using /...\ also involved in the >> distributed systems community here, though mostly as an enthusiast >> (I'm not implementing paxos or anything). >> >> Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this >> community goes. >> >> Paul
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-01 11:10:40
holger krekel <holger@merlinux.eu >> <mailto:holger@merlinux.eu>> wrote: >> >>> Don't do anything illegal >> >> That seems like something that is negotiated in our societal >> surrounding context and is thus redundant to state or demand /...\ again. > > I think in this context it is probably, “Don’t do anything that > will land another community member in Jail. Particularly Ross > because he’s claustrophobic.” > > I don’t think people’s adherence /...\ whole (even ‘Judges' drive faster than the speed > limit from time to time). > >> >>> Don't do anything that can damage the good name or the >>> reputation of the party. Don't use any funds of the party
Jacob Cook [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 19:00:50
first class deployment method into > arkOS. > > Running services securely sandboxed could greatly improve security, > not to say that almost _anything_ can be made to run in a Docker > container. > > -- Martin > > Am Do, 2. Jan, 2014 um 7:16 schrieb Eric Mill /...\ heard of, things >> that would play into this sort of model of Easier Self-Hosting. >> I haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie >> together a bunch of the technologies people here are working /...\ involved in the distributed systems community here, though >>> mostly as an enthusiast (I'm not implementing paxos or >>> anything). >>> >>> Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this >>> community goes
Steve Phillips [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-01 02:23:24
ross@servercode.co.uk > wrote: Hi, > On 1 Dec 2014, at 09:12, holger krekel < holger@merlinux.eu > wrote: > >> Don't do anything illegal > > That seems like something that is negotiated in our societal surrounding > context and is thus redundant to state or demand again /...\ think in this context it is probably, “Don’t do anything that will land another community member in Jail. Particularly Ross because he’s claustrophobic.” I don’t think people’s adherence /...\ whole (even ‘Judges' drive faster than the speed limit from time to time). > >> Don't do anything that can damage the good name or the >> reputation of the party. >> Don't use any funds of the party
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-05 16:13:36
first class deployment method into > arkOS. > > Running services securely sandboxed could greatly improve security, > not to say that almost _anything_ can be made to run in a Docker > container. > > -- Martin > > Am Do, 2. Jan, 2014 um 7:16 schrieb Eric Mill /...\ things >>  that would play into this sort of model of Easier Self-Hosting. >> I haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie >>  together a bunch of the technologies people here are working /...\ involved in the distributed systems community here, though >>> mostly as an enthusiast (I'm not implementing paxos or >>> anything). >>> >>> Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this >>> community goes
fernando.gs@gmail.com [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-02 11:17:15
holger krekel <holger@merlinux.eu >>> <mailto:holger@merlinux.eu>> wrote: >>> >>>> Don't do anything illegal >>> >>> That seems like something that is negotiated in our societal >>> surrounding context and is thus redundant /...\ state or demand >>> again. >> >> I think in this context it is probably, “Don’t do anything that >> will land another community member in Jail. Particularly Ross >> because he’s claustrophobic /...\ drive faster than the speed >> limit from time to time). >> >>> >>>> Don't do anything that can damage the good name or the >>>> reputation of the party. Don't use any funds of the party
Kiktron RAKO [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-02 11:37:56
holger krekel < holger@merlinux.eu >>> <mailto: holger@merlinux.eu >> wrote: >>> >>>> Don't do anything illegal >>> >>> That seems like something that is negotiated in our societal >>> surrounding context and is thus redundant /...\ again. >> >> I think in this context it is probably, “Don’t do anything that >> will land another community member in Jail. Particularly Ross >> because he’s claustrophobic /...\ drive faster than the speed >> limit from time to time). >> >>> >>>> Don't do anything that can damage the good name or the >>>> reputation of the party. Don't use any funds of the party
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-03-03 16:07:34
their legal opinion (in addition to the peer-review of the original publication) we hoped to foster confidence that we did not miss anything important.  But still that's the normal course of affairs in science, isn't it? This is not a good idea, it will result /...\ highly insecure product. I'll certainly NOT invite you to find a hack or anything into the software we wrote as a proof of anything. That would be pseudo-scientific and no proof at all.  After all we might have a bug there anyway. You are however welcome
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-13 21:04:47
supposed to know whether to trust some third party before signing it. That's the huge fail with the existing CAs. They'll sign anything. Moxie Marlinspike has had a number of relevant things to say about that. > That's the general pattern that I see. The easiest approach /...\ sense that's true, because if the network is totally compromised, meaning no communication can take place between anyone, then you can't do anything in the direction of fixing it without having some external network to use to coordinate. But that's only a problem before bootstrap /...\ nobody is using it therefore nobody will ever use it therefore it's a waste of time... > Then as long as you have [anything] that can perform the necessary function (e.g. message relay or lookup database), everything requiring that function can carry on working. You can have your cake
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 21:58:22
first class deployment method into > arkOS. > > Running services securely sandboxed could greatly improve security, > not to say that almost _anything_ can be made to run in a Docker > container. > > -- Martin > > Am Do, 2. Jan, 2014 um 7:16 schrieb Eric Mill /...\ things >>  that would play into this sort of model of Easier Self-Hosting. >> I haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie >>  together a bunch of the technologies people here are working /...\ involved in the distributed systems community here, though >>> mostly as an enthusiast (I'm not implementing paxos or >>> anything). >>> >>> Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this >>> community goes
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-03-03 12:22:12
their legal opinion (in addition to the peer-review of the original publication) we hoped to foster confidence that we did not miss anything important.  But still that's the normal course of affairs in science, isn't it? This is not a good idea, it will result /...\ highly insecure product. I'll certainly NOT invite you to find a hack or anything into the software we wrote as a proof of anything. That would be pseudo-scientific and no proof at all.  After all we might have a bug there anyway. You are however welcome
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-01 09:28:40
holger krekel <holger@merlinux.eu> wrote: > >> Don't do anything illegal > > That seems like something that is negotiated in our societal surrounding > context and is thus redundant to state or demand again. I think in this context it is probably /...\ anything that will land another community member in Jail. Particularly Ross because he’s claustrophobic.” I don’t think people’s adherence to the law is particularly black and white on the whole (even ‘Judges' drive faster than the speed limit from time to time /...\ anything that can damage the good name or the >> reputation of the party. >> Don't use any funds of the party. You may ask for funds. > > Don't really apply i guess because "redecentralize" is not a party
David Geib [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 15:27:01
going on on a network. I worked infosec for a bit and never saw one single real world threat that the firewall really did anything to protect us from. All the malware I saw came in via HTTP "pull", e-mail, and file sync. The only real-world threat /...\ firewall still does anything to protect us from is the threat of a worm exploiting a true remote hole in a common local service. That threat could be mitigated if OSes did a better job running services in isolation... just kill the offending infected service container, and the system
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 12:31:33
going on on a network. I worked infosec for a bit and never saw one single real world threat that the firewall really did anything to protect us from. All the malware I saw came in via HTTP "pull", e-mail, and file sync. The only real-world threat /...\ firewall still does anything to protect us from is the threat of a worm exploiting a true remote hole in a common local service. That threat could be mitigated if OSes did a better job running services in isolation... just kill the offending infected service container, and the system
holger krekel [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-01 09:12:55
agree on something they can act. However, I am not sure how the three conditions you reference apply here: > Don't do anything illegal That seems like something that is negotiated in our societal surrounding context and is thus redundant to state or demand again /...\ anything that can damage the good name or the > reputation of the party. > Don't use any funds of the party. You may ask for funds. Don't really apply i guess because "redecentralize" is not a party. So all in all i think referencing
Michael Rogers [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-07 17:32:09
systems that are usable, efficient and secure. But I have some doubts about your argument. I don't think the Tsitsiklis/Xu paper tells us anything about centralisation vs decentralisation in general. It gives a very abstract model of a system where some fraction of a scarce resource can be allocated /...\ denying that a touch of centralisation could help to make ZeroTier more usable, efficient and secure - I just don't think this paper does anything to support that contention. You mention split-brain and internet weather as problems ZeroTier should cope with, but I'm not sure centralisation will help
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-19 12:52:55
Michael Rogers <michael@briarproject.org> wrote: > I don't think the Tsitsiklis/Xu paper tells us anything about > centralisation vs decentralisation in general. It gives a very > abstract model of a system where some fraction of a scarce resource > can be allocated wherever it's needed /...\ most superficial sort is onion routing. Onion routing is inherently expensive. I’m not sure anyone’s going to use it for anything “routine” or huge-scale. … that is unless someone invents something new. I have wondered if linear coding schemes might offer
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Check out Hiveware's decentralized platform (as in no servers) 2015-09-02 13:06:32
each visitor. Second-hand bookstore are not illegal. Public libraries either. "Intellectual property" is a confusing legal construct that covers anything from authorship rights to patent laws. It would be akin to say that a fence, a kitchen, and a book belong to the same "physical property /...\ forced or not. Open source is a reduction of the free software philosophy to its engineering aspect, specifically designed to tame corporate fears about anything social. It succeeded in bringing free software to the mainstream, but it fails to inflect technological innovation towards inclusive goals beyond the elite class
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 12:02:36
going on on a network. I worked infosec for a bit and never saw one single real world threat that the firewall really did anything to protect us from. All the malware I saw came in via HTTP "pull", e-mail, and file sync. The only real-world threat /...\ firewall still does anything to protect us from is the threat of a worm exploiting a true remote hole in a common local service. That threat could be mitigated if OSes did a better job running services in isolation... just kill the offending infected service container, and the system
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 01:16:33
working on, or has heard of, things that would play into this sort of model of Easier Self-Hosting. I haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie together a bunch of the technologies people here are working on.  I could also imagine /...\ this realm. I'm also involved in the distributed systems community here, though mostly as an enthusiast (I'm not implementing paxos or anything). Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this community goes. Paul F -- konklone.com | @konklone
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-05 12:31:45
important if we want to push intelligence to the edges, which is what "decentralization" is at least partly about. Mobile makes efficiency * really * important. Anything that requires that a mobile device constantly sling packets is simply off the table, since it would kill battery life and eat up cellular data
David Geib [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-14 04:30:54
true broadcast medium under your control then you can broadcast your key so that anyone can get it. If you don't have *anything*, you have to ask what it is you're supposed to be trusting. If you start communicating with some John Doe on the other side
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-19 12:22:38
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1:30 AM, David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: It
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 18:26:32
often fail to consider > > the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from "the > > big picture" anything that "doesn't compute". > > > > A prime example is this belief that connecting everyone to the > Internet
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-20 13:10:03
societies better (i.e., the governments less broken) once we understood how to implement it with the rigor required in programming. So instead of inventing anything anew – which people would the have to learn, adopt and accept – we tried to map these concepts as good as we can into
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-22 13:51:28
think there’s anything wrong with plugging a project. Part of what this group is about is discussing various work going on in this area. I’ve been following Ethereum for a long time, and I’m really fascinated
Stephan Tual [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-24 22:15:06
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-02 12:35:23
former might contain lots of market niches for centralized products, services, and trust chains, but the latter all but *prohibits* decentralized approaches to anything. For decentralized networks, non-local firewalls and *especially* NAT present a “DENY ALL” rule that requires thousands of hours of “black
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-17 01:17:28
adoptable without compromising their integrity.   I will be on hand at the conference along with all the other volunteers so if you need anything at all do not hesitate to ask! I look forward to seeing you all on Saturday.   Also everyone feel free to use this mailing
Michael Rogers [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-09-12 17:14:40
sort is onion routing. Onion > routing is inherently expensive. I’m not sure anyone’s going to use > it for anything “routine” or huge-scale. Onion routing will always be more expensive than direct routing, but bandwidth keeps getting cheaper
mempko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The Cloud's Shadow on Grass Computing 2015-04-03 18:11:20
tends to inflate things like wages in the long term. So paying for stuff online makes you poorer, but if nobody pays for anything online we get pathologies like the surveillance-driven centralized silo Internet. We all get poorer. Seems at least analogous to me. If we all paid
Pierre Ozoux [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The Cloud's Shadow on Grass Computing 2015-04-04 00:38:32
mempko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The Cloud's Shadow on Grass Computing 2015-04-03 08:45:25
href="http://firestr.com/">Fire★</a> falls on the private/known mode of communication, and I am not attempting to make it anything else.  ZeroTier One can act as public or private and it makes sense to me why he chose some central points to handle the public
ken Code [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] 2015-08-02 10:33:39
know. You might get blacklisted if ur not careful, so be sure to check ur scripts etc. Let me know if u need anything, thanx :) ken <sig> ken Code Delegate & Crypto Coach http://BitShares-Munich.de http://youtube.com/BitSharesMunich-de http://google.com/+BitSharesMunich-de PLEASE VOTE! delegate.kencode Tweets & Skype: @kenCode
will schiller [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] 2015-08-05 12:37:01
know. You might get blacklisted if ur not careful, so be sure to check ur scripts etc. Let me know if u need anything, thanx :) ken <sig> ken Code Delegate & Crypto Coach http://BitShares-Munich.de http://youtube.com/BitSharesMunich-de http://google.com/+BitSharesMunich-de PLEASE VOTE! delegate.kencode Tweets & Skype: @kenCode
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 11:17:34
problems. They often fail to consider the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from "the big picture" anything that "doesn't compute". A prime example is this belief that connecting everyone to the Internet will bring more benefits than harm
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-16 11:31:17
will be on hand at the conference along with all the other volunteers > so if you need anything at all do not hesitate to ask! I look forward > to seeing you all on Saturday. >> >> Also everyone > feel free to use this mailing list
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-16 13:38:46
adoptable without compromising their integrity. I will be on hand at the conference along with all the other volunteers so if you need anything at all do not hesitate to ask! I look forward to seeing you all on Saturday. Also everyone feel free to use this mailing list
Filipe Farinha [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] To go with my search talk yesterday 2015-10-18 15:07:05
doubt it. In terms of UX, latency is probably one of the biggest barriers to adoption with most p2p implementations of anything. I switched from Altavista to Google back in the early 2000s not because the results were more relevant, but because it was so much faster. Filipe Farinha
ben [GG] Re: Public Money until tomorrow evening: 2016-04-11 11:25:00
here the proof of the power of decentralized logics ;-) I don't know if my answer can help, but for sure not telling anything will not move the lines ! Cheers, -- Benjamin ANDRE - Cozy Cloud CEO - +33 686 253 666   On 11/04/2016 19:48, Pierre-Yves Gosset wrote
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The Cloud's Shadow on Grass Computing 2015-04-03 15:31:53
tends to inflate things like wages in the long term. So paying for stuff online makes you poorer, but if nobody pays for anything online we get pathologies like the surveillance-driven centralized silo Internet. We all get poorer. Seems at least analogous to me. If we all paid
feross [GG] Re: WebTorrent Desktop - open source streaming torrent client 2016-04-06 20:19:00
need to manually add torrents to the client. We don't want to make the client automatically download popular content, or seed it, or anything like that. The user should decide what to share since the content could be unencrypted and that's potentially dangerous. If you're looking
Jacob Cook [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2013-12-29 17:24:16
realm. I'm also involved in the > distributed systems community here, though mostly as an enthusiast > (I'm not implementing paxos or anything). > > Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this > community goes. > > Paul F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version
Scott Jenson [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2013-12-29 19:26:39
realm. I'm also involved in the > distributed systems community here, though mostly as an enthusiast > (I'm not implementing paxos or anything). > > Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this > community goes. > > Paul F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version
Thomas Levine [GG] Distributed Dance Party update 2018-06-18 23:34:00
DogeCon is a weekend celebration of the SOCIAL layer of crypto culture and   an event truly unlike anything seen before! This "Year of the Doge"   extravaganza will feature a broad range of intensely participatory   experiences from carefree and whimsical to deep dialectical dialogues
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Net Neutrality Ruling, Internet Interprets Censorship as Damage, There are no Captains, Decentralize Everything, etc. 2014-01-14 14:38:21
board with decentralization, open source, and as close to p2p as possible, we need to make it so easy to defeat censorship of anything that those who propose allowing it to happen will just throw up their hands in frustration. So the question (one of many!) is how to present
Anish Mangal [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 22:29:01
problems.  They often fail to consider > the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from "the > big picture" anything that "doesn't compute". > > A prime example is this belief that connecting everyone to the Internet > will bring more benefits than harm
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Blog posts 2014-01-21 10:18:04
know that the latest blog posts are > up (from Francis and Mike) and are at > http://redecentralize.org/blog/ - if anybody has anything they’d > like to say (that is mostly on topic) we’d love to have guest > bloggers! Provided in Markdown format would
holger krekel [LibreList] any meeting point for tonight? 2015-10-16 08:18:38
ising their integrity. > > I will be on hand at the conference along with all the other volunteers so if you need anything at all do not hesitate to ask! I look forward to seeing you all on Saturday. > > Also everyone feel free to use this mailing
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Check out Hiveware's decentralized platform (as in no servers) 2015-09-02 15:33:14
sense to me. > may I please be allowed to discuss my technology as part of the > current P2P diaspora? My technology is anything but proprietary > in the traditional sense. Just because I maintain that I own > it, doesn't mean that it is non-seeable
Robert Tischer [LibreList] RE: [redecentralize] Check out Hiveware's decentralized platform (as in no servers) 2015-09-02 16:36:16
sense to me. > may I please be allowed to discuss my technology as part of the > current P2P diaspora? My technology is anything but proprietary in the > traditional sense. Just because I maintain that I own it, doesn't mean > that it is non-seeable
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] First Person Technologies 2014-03-30 15:00:08
first.  We the people are being lost in the battle between those two trying to control and manage all technology and information flow. ... Anything that you alone control, that has no other master, no company that can disable it, no clou d API that it depends on to work
Ximin Luo [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] First Person Technologies 2014-03-31 19:36:04
Anish Mangal [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 21:02:50
problems.  They often fail to consider the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from "the big picture" anything that "doesn't compute". A prime example is this belief that connecting everyone to the Internet will bring more benefits than harm
Francis Irving [LibreList] Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-15 20:07:43
adoptable without compromising their integrity.   I will be on hand at the conference along with all the other volunteers so if you need anything at all do not hesitate to ask! I look forward to seeing you all on Saturday.   Also everyone feel free to use this mailing
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Intros and current projects 2013-12-29 15:11:48
this realm. I'm also involved in the distributed systems community here, though mostly as an enthusiast (I'm not implementing paxos or anything). Nice meeting you all, and I look forward to seeing where this community goes. Paul
Odinn Cyberguerrilla [LibreList] Net Neutrality Ruling, Internet Interprets Censorship as Damage, There are no Captains, Decentralize Everything, etc. 2014-01-14 12:14:11
board with decentralization, open source, and as close to p2p as possible, we need to make it so easy to defeat censorship of anything that those who propose allowing it to happen will just throw up their hands in frustration. So the question (one of many!) is how to present
Ross Jones [LibreList] Blog posts 2014-01-21 10:15:31
know that the latest blog posts are up (from Francis and Mike) and are at  http://redecentralize.org/blog/  - if anybody has anything they’d like to say (that is mostly on topic) we’d love to have guest bloggers!  Provided
P S [LibreList] First Person Technologies 2014-03-29 17:32:15
first.  We the people are being lost in the battle between those two trying to control and manage all technology and information flow. ... Anything that you alone control, that has no other master, no company that can disable it, no cloud API that it depends on to work, nobody
Ross Jones [LibreList] Help/volunteer request - Interviewees for social ramifications of online privacy 2014-05-15 08:31:47
small period of time to do an interview (via whichever medium you’d like). I’m not sure it’ll fix anything, but I for one am interested in how the issues are seen from a psychologist’s point of view. If anyone
Steve Phillips [LibreList] Re: Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-15 14:07:49
without compromising their integrity.   I will be on hand at the conference along with all the other volunteers so if you need anything at all do not hesitate to ask! I look forward to seeing you all on Saturday.   Also everyone feel free to use this
will.sch [LibreList] RDC 15 2015-10-15 13:25:28
adoptable without compromising their integrity. I will be on hand at the conference along with all the other volunteers so if you need anything at all do not hesitate to ask! I look forward to seeing you all on Saturday. Also everyone feel free to use this mailing list
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 17:36:01
problems. They often fail to consider > the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from "the > big picture" anything that "doesn't compute". > > A prime example is this belief that connecting everyone to the Internet > will bring more benefits
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-04 16:04:39
want to push intelligence to the edges, which is what "decentralization" is at least partly about. Mobile makes efficiency *really* important. Anything that requires that a mobile device constantly sling packets is simply off the table, since it would kill battery life and eat up cellular data quotas