Feross Aboukhadijeh [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-31 17:54:38 WebRTC can speak whatever protocol you want (you can design your own). WebTorrent is going to speak the same
BitTorrent protocol, as much as possible. WebRTC does not allow you to open arbitrary TCP or UDP sockets, which is what I think you're asking. Existing torrent clients will need
/...\ francis@flourish.org > wrote:
Feross, quick question about this...
Can WebRTC Data Channels natively speak arbitary protocols, so they
can just implement the regular
BitTorrent protocol?
Or will existing
BitTorrent clients need updating?
Francis
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:31:00PM -0800, Feross Aboukhadijeh wrote:
> Hey everyone
/...\ wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent< http://webtorrent.io >
> .
>
> I'm building a browser
BitTorrent client that requires no install (no
> plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular
BitTorrent
> network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer
explain Tribler quickly. Basically we have a fully
decentralised Youtube,
plus are doing anonymous streaming tests now.
Tribler is not merely a streaming
Bittorrent client, we build various things on
top of our P2P distributed database, such a wiki-style editing of metadata.
We do not use the TOR network
/...\ enhanced their protocol to make
it compatible with our NAT puncturing techniques.
Overview paper: http://sigmm.org/records/records1201/featured03.html
About the merit of
Bittorrent..
Our framework offers generic SOCKS5 interface, so other apps can also use it.
> Also what is the point of that graph on that last link - what
/...\ Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote:
> Hey Johan,
>
> Can you sell us/me on Tribler a bit? Looks like it's a
bittorrent client
> that you're putting behind TOR, plus an over-the-local-wifi feature. The two
> things I wonder: what's the merit
explain Tribler quickly. Basically we have a fully
decentralised Youtube,
plus are doing anonymous streaming tests now.
Tribler is not merely a streaming
Bittorrent client, we build various things on
top of our P2P distributed database, such a wiki-style editing of metadata.
We do not use the TOR network
/...\ enhanced their protocol to make
it compatible with our NAT puncturing techniques.
Overview paper: http://sigmm.org/records/records1201/featured03.html
About the merit of
Bittorrent..
Our framework offers generic SOCKS5 interface, so other apps can also use it.
> Also what is the point of that graph on that last link - what
/...\ Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Johan,
>
> Can you sell us/me on Tribler a bit? Looks like it's a
bittorrent client
> that you're putting behind TOR, plus an over-the-local-wifi feature. The two
> things I wonder: what's the merit
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-30 12:09:19 Feross, quick question about this...
Can WebRTC Data Channels natively speak arbitary protocols, so they
can just implement the regular
BitTorrent protocol?
Or will existing
BitTorrent clients need updating?
Francis
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:31:00PM -0800, Feross Aboukhadijeh wrote:
> Hey everyone! I think Redecentralize
/...\ wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent<http://webtorrent.io>
> .
>
> I'm building a browser
BitTorrent client that requires no install (no
> plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular
BitTorrent
> network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer
/...\ Since WebTorrent is web-first, it's simple for users who do not understand
> .torrent files, magnet links, NAT configuration, etc. to use
BitTorrent. By
> making it easier, we're making it accessible to new swathes of users who
> were previously intimidated, confused, or unwilling to install
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-08 18:36:58 example I cite in my WebRTC evangelism. :) So I am also a huge fan of https://www.sharefest.me , which is a very
BitTorrent-like model for file sharing via WebRTC, though it's modeled to resemble people's conception of file hosting platforms like YouSendIt and MegaUpload.
UX-wise
/...\ WebRTC Data Black Magic  at RealtimeConf!
I wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent . I'm building a browser
BitTorrent client that requires no install (no plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular
BitTorrent network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer
/...\ file.
Since WebTorrent is web-first, it's simple for users who do not understand .torrent files, magnet links, NAT configuration, etc. to use
BitTorrent. By making it easier, we're making it accessible to new swathes of users who were previously intimidated, confused, or unwilling to install a program
Feross Aboukhadijeh [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-08 15:46:06 example I cite in my WebRTC evangelism. :) So I am also a huge fan of https://www.sharefest.me , which is a very
BitTorrent-like model for file sharing via WebRTC, though it's modeled to resemble people's conception of file hosting platforms like YouSendIt and MegaUpload.
UX-wise
/...\ WebRTC Data Black Magic  at RealtimeConf!
I wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent . I'm building a browser
BitTorrent client that requires no install (no plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular
BitTorrent network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer
/...\ file.
Since WebTorrent is web-first, it's simple for users who do not understand .torrent files, magnet links, NAT configuration, etc. to use
BitTorrent. By making it easier, we're making it accessible to new swathes of users who were previously intimidated, confused, or unwilling to install a program
Johan, Can you sell us/me on Tribler a bit? Looks like it's a
bittorrent client that you're putting behind TOR, plus an over-the-local-wifi feature. The two things I wonder: what's the merit of
bittorrent as a replacement communication structure when applications don't communicate
/...\ wire specs operational in Beta with
modifications for UDP support.
Plus backwards compatibility and anonymous streaming from existing
Bittorrent swarms.
Next step is expanding our Android port and enhance our NFC sync capability.
Tech docs: https://github.com/Tribler/tribler/wiki#tor-like-onion-routing-and-privacy-protection
Our promo text: The Shadow Internet - a censorship-free communication
infrastructure
Feross Aboukhadijeh [LibreList] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-08 15:31:00 WebRTC Data Black Magic  at RealtimeConf!
I wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent . I'm building a browser
BitTorrent client that requires no install (no plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular
BitTorrent network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer
/...\ file.
Since WebTorrent is web-first, it's simple for users who do not understand .torrent files, magnet links, NAT configuration, etc. to use
BitTorrent. By making it easier, we're making it accessible to new swathes of users who were previously intimidated, confused, or unwilling to install a program
folks! Just wanted to share that the WebTorrent Project just shipped WebTorrent Desktop (BETA) today! https://webtorrent.io/desktop WebTorrent Desktop bridges the WebTorrent and BitTorrent networks. If enough people end up running it, BitTorrent in the browser will really happen. Projects like the Internet Archive can make huge files available
story. As far as funding goes, three of the projects you list are funded to some level by angel or venture capital: BitTorrent, ZeroTier, and Sandstorm. I think OwnCloud, which you didn’t mention, is funded too. Some capital is going into this stuff
using.
When people hear "open source" or "p2p" they might think of Ubuntu, or
Android (regarding open source OSs) or Bittorrent, or Piratebay (in terms
of things that come to mind if an ordinary human is asked what do they
thing of as an example
wire specs operational in Beta with
modifications for UDP support.
Plus backwards compatibility and anonymous streaming from existing
Bittorrent swarms.
Next step is expanding our Android port and enhance our NFC sync capability.
Tech docs: https://github.com/Tribler/tribler/wiki#tor-like-onion-routing-and-privacy-protection
Our promo text: The Shadow Internet - a censorship-free communication
infrastructure
submitted!
IPFS - my impression is it is a developer level tool. Are there any
end user apps / hosting services based on it you recommend?
BitTorrent - is very well known, and has its own very particular
use case for file sharing. So I'm not inclined to cover
juh [GG] Zeronet and Twister anyone 2016-04-06 22:31:00 blog with a mouse click.
Twister is a blockchain Twitter alternative.
http://twister.net.co/
Zeronet and Twister use implementations of the blockchain technology and
Bittorrent to setup the netwerk and distribute the content.
While Twister is limited to microblogging functionality Zeronet aims to
setup all kind of services and websites
story.
As far as funding goes, three of the
projects you list are funded to some level by angel or
venture capital: BitTorrent, ZeroTier, and Sandstorm.
I think OwnCloud, which you didn’t mention, is funded
too.
Some capital is going into this stuff
story. As far as funding goes, three of the projects you list are funded to some level by angel or venture capital: BitTorrent, ZeroTier, and Sandstorm. I think OwnCloud, which you didn’t mention, is funded too. Some capital is going into this stuff
things that are usable for developers and IT people and then things that are usable for end users. How do we submit stuff? IPFS, BitTorrent, ZeroTier, and of course all the cryptocurrency stuff should be on there to the extent that it is usable. Re: Redecentralize Radar, our super picky
accustomed to hearing about /
using.
When people hear "open source" or "p2p" they might think of Ubuntu, or
Android (regarding open source OSs) or Bittorrent, or Piratebay (in terms
of things that come to mind if an ordinary human is asked what do they
thing of as an example