Redecentralize

WebRTC can speak whatever protocol you want (you can design your own). WebTorrent is going to speak the same BitTorrent protocol, as much as possible. WebRTC does not allow you to open arbitrary TCP or UDP sockets, which is what I think you're asking. Existing torrent clients will need /...\ francis@flourish.org > wrote: Feross, quick question about this... Can WebRTC Data Channels natively speak arbitary protocols, so they can just implement the regular BitTorrent protocol? Or will existing BitTorrent clients need updating? Francis On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:31:00PM -0800, Feross Aboukhadijeh wrote: > Hey everyone /...\ wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent< http://webtorrent.io > > . > > I'm building a browser BitTorrent client that requires no install (no > plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular BitTorrent > network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer

explain Tribler quickly. Basically we have a fully decentralised Youtube, plus are doing anonymous streaming tests now. Tribler is not merely a streaming Bittorrent client, we build various things on top of our P2P distributed database, such a wiki-style editing of metadata. We do not use the TOR network /...\ enhanced their protocol to make it compatible with our NAT puncturing techniques. Overview paper: http://sigmm.org/records/records1201/featured03.html About the merit of Bittorrent.. Our framework offers generic SOCKS5 interface, so other apps can also use it. > Also what is the point of that graph on that last link - what /...\ Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote: > Hey Johan, > > Can you sell us/me on Tribler a bit? Looks like it's a bittorrent client > that you're putting behind TOR, plus an over-the-local-wifi feature. The two > things I wonder: what's the merit

explain Tribler quickly. Basically we have a fully decentralised Youtube, plus are doing anonymous streaming tests now. Tribler is not merely a streaming Bittorrent client, we build various things on top of our P2P distributed database, such a wiki-style editing of metadata. We do not use the TOR network /...\ enhanced their protocol to make it compatible with our NAT puncturing techniques. Overview paper: http://sigmm.org/records/records1201/featured03.html About the merit of Bittorrent.. Our framework offers generic SOCKS5 interface, so other apps can also use it. > Also what is the point of that graph on that last link - what /...\ Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Johan, > > Can you sell us/me on Tribler a bit? Looks like it's a bittorrent client > that you're putting behind TOR, plus an over-the-local-wifi feature. The two > things I wonder: what's the merit

Feross, quick question about this... Can WebRTC Data Channels natively speak arbitary protocols, so they can just implement the regular BitTorrent protocol? Or will existing BitTorrent clients need updating? Francis On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:31:00PM -0800, Feross Aboukhadijeh wrote: > Hey everyone! I think Redecentralize /...\ wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent<http://webtorrent.io> > . > > I'm building a browser BitTorrent client that requires no install (no > plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular BitTorrent > network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer /...\ Since WebTorrent is web-first, it's simple for users who do not understand > .torrent files, magnet links, NAT configuration, etc. to use BitTorrent. By > making it easier, we're making it accessible to new swathes of users who > were previously intimidated, confused, or unwilling to install

example I cite in my WebRTC evangelism. :) So I am also a huge fan of  https://www.sharefest.me , which is a very BitTorrent-like model for file sharing via WebRTC, though it's modeled to resemble people's conception of file hosting platforms like YouSendIt and MegaUpload. UX-wise /...\ WebRTC Data Black Magic  at RealtimeConf! I wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent . I'm building a browser BitTorrent client that requires no install (no plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular BitTorrent network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer /...\ file. Since WebTorrent is web-first, it's simple for users who do not understand .torrent files, magnet links, NAT configuration, etc. to use BitTorrent. By making it easier, we're making it accessible to new swathes of users who were previously intimidated, confused, or unwilling to install a program

example I cite in my WebRTC evangelism. :) So I am also a huge fan of  https://www.sharefest.me , which is a very BitTorrent-like model for file sharing via WebRTC, though it's modeled to resemble people's conception of file hosting platforms like YouSendIt and MegaUpload. UX-wise /...\ WebRTC Data Black Magic  at RealtimeConf! I wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent . I'm building a browser BitTorrent client that requires no install (no plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular BitTorrent network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer /...\ file. Since WebTorrent is web-first, it's simple for users who do not understand .torrent files, magnet links, NAT configuration, etc. to use BitTorrent. By making it easier, we're making it accessible to new swathes of users who were previously intimidated, confused, or unwilling to install a program

Johan, Can you sell us/me on Tribler a bit? Looks like it's a bittorrent client that you're putting behind TOR, plus an over-the-local-wifi feature. The two things I wonder: what's the merit of bittorrent as a replacement communication structure when applications don't communicate /...\ wire specs operational in Beta with modifications for UDP support. Plus backwards compatibility and anonymous streaming from existing Bittorrent swarms. Next step is expanding our Android port and enhance our NFC sync capability. Tech docs: https://github.com/Tribler/tribler/wiki#tor-like-onion-routing-and-privacy-protection Our promo text: The Shadow Internet - a censorship-free communication infrastructure

WebRTC Data Black Magic  at RealtimeConf! I wanted to share a bit about my new project, WebTorrent . I'm building a browser BitTorrent client that requires no install (no plugin/extension/etc.) and fully-interoperates with the regular BitTorrent network. We'll use WebRTC Data Channels for peer-to-peer /...\ file. Since WebTorrent is web-first, it's simple for users who do not understand .torrent files, magnet links, NAT configuration, etc. to use BitTorrent. By making it easier, we're making it accessible to new swathes of users who were previously intimidated, confused, or unwilling to install a program

folks! Just wanted to share that the WebTorrent Project just shipped WebTorrent Desktop (BETA) today! https://webtorrent.io/desktop WebTorrent Desktop bridges the WebTorrent and BitTorrent networks. If enough people end up running it, BitTorrent in the browser will really happen. Projects like the Internet Archive can make huge files available

story. As far as funding goes, three of the projects you list are funded to some level by angel or venture capital: BitTorrent, ZeroTier, and Sandstorm. I think OwnCloud, which you didn’t mention, is funded too. Some capital is going into this stuff

using. When people hear "open source" or "p2p" they might think of Ubuntu, or Android (regarding open source OSs) or Bittorrent, or Piratebay (in terms of things that come to mind if an ordinary human is asked what do they thing of as an example

wire specs operational in Beta with modifications for UDP support. Plus backwards compatibility and anonymous streaming from existing Bittorrent swarms. Next step is expanding our Android port and enhance our NFC sync capability. Tech docs: https://github.com/Tribler/tribler/wiki#tor-like-onion-routing-and-privacy-protection Our promo text: The Shadow Internet - a censorship-free communication infrastructure

submitted! IPFS - my impression is it is a developer level tool. Are there any end user apps / hosting services based on it you recommend? BitTorrent - is very well known, and has its own very particular use case for file sharing. So I'm not inclined to cover

blog with a mouse click. Twister is a blockchain Twitter alternative. http://twister.net.co/ Zeronet and Twister use implementations of the blockchain technology and Bittorrent to setup the netwerk and distribute the content. While Twister is limited to microblogging functionality Zeronet aims to setup all kind of services and websites

story. As far as funding goes, three of the projects you list are funded to some level by angel or venture capital: BitTorrent, ZeroTier, and Sandstorm. I think OwnCloud, which you didn’t mention, is funded too. Some capital is going into this stuff

story. As far as funding goes, three of the projects you list are funded to some level by angel or venture capital: BitTorrent, ZeroTier, and Sandstorm. I think OwnCloud, which you didn’t mention, is funded too. Some capital is going into this stuff

things that are usable for developers and IT people and then things that are usable for end users. How do we submit stuff? IPFS, BitTorrent, ZeroTier, and of course all the cryptocurrency stuff should be on there to the extent that it is usable. Re: Redecentralize Radar, our super picky

accustomed to hearing about / using. When people hear "open source" or "p2p" they might think of Ubuntu, or Android (regarding open source OSs) or Bittorrent, or Piratebay (in terms of things that come to mind if an ordinary human is asked what do they thing of as an example