Login

Redecentralize

We’ve had enough of digital monopolies and surveillance capitalism. We want an alternative world that works for everyone, just like the original intention of the web and net.

We seek a world of open platforms and protocols with real choices of applications and services for people. We care about privacy, transparency and autonomy. Our tools and organisations should fundamentally be accountable and resilient.

Home
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Applying User-Agent Behaviors in Web Applications to Enable Runtime Extension 2014-03-10 14:51:13
Askemos solves trust BY distributing application state". Especially by distributing it to parties having a stake in either a) correct results b) conflicting interests iff they where trying to play foul. In an ideal world, we would integrate some Askemos-compliant cache code right into the users browser /...\ user close to the browser, typically at the same machine. Autonomy in this case mean: applications are autonomous from any party's dissenting interest. (Only majority dissent will stop them.) Since we guarantee (by a simple, yet clever rule how permissions might be assigned) that no person can impersonate /...\ development became kinda confusing in our context. After all the server is virtually there even though physically not. (Another - related - confusion might be interesting to readers looking at it from a legal background: in such a network new objects are created at all nodes running the creating application
David Geib [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-14 04:30:54
snow key, website, etc. A little bit social network + web of trust + key:value store. > I think the tech behind it is more interesting than Bitcoin itself. It reminds me of the web. Hypertext, browsers, and the new hybrid thin client model they led to was interesting. The internet /...\ certainly damn interesting. But pets.com and flooz? Not so much. Agreed. It's interesting because it solves a lot of the hard problems with digital currencies but not all of them. It's clearly an evolutionary step on the road to something else. Which is what concerns me about /...\ www.aaronsw.com/weblog/squarezooko This is essentially the roadmap that led to namecoin, which (among other things) disproved Zooko's Triangle. Actually that's an interesting point. Zooko's triangle was supposed to be that you couldn't have a naming system which is decentralized, has global human-readable names
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-16 13:38:46
together a peer to peer application infrastructure to support targeted distribution and clearing of news, events and distribution of background materials and personal interest preferences from anywhere in the world with each other that worked over PSTN via mobile devices correspondents used at the time and acoustic couplers. Internet /...\ recent dips into it to wonder if the time is not right to revisit some of these ideas. If the meeting comes up with interest do get in touch! thanks  Christian will.sch wrote: Hi, I'm Will (one of the many volunteers helping to organise RDC 15). Firstly /...\ opportunity to create positive societal change in many areas and that is the reason I volunteered to help. One of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are censorship proof, that remove bias
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-17 01:17:28
together a peer to peer application infrastructure to support targeted distribution and clearing of news, events and distribution of background materials and personal interest preferences from anywhere in the world with each other that worked over PSTN via mobile devices correspondents used at the time and acoustic couplers. Internet /...\ dips into it to wonder if the time is not right to revisit some of these ideas.   If the meeting comes up with interest do get in touch! thanks      Christian   will.sch wrote:     Hi,   I'm Will (one of the many volunteers helping /...\ opportunity to create positive societal change in many areas and that is the reason I volunteered to help.   One of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are censorship proof, that remove
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Applying User-Agent Behaviors in Web Applications to Enable Runtime Extension 2014-03-10 11:51:10
solves trust BY distributing application state".  Especially by distributing it to parties having a stake in either a) correct results b) conflicting interests iff they where trying to play foul. In an ideal world, we would integrate some Askemos-compliant cache code right into the users browser /...\ user close to the browser, typically at the same machine. Autonomy in this case mean: applications are autonomous from any party's dissenting interest. (Only majority dissent will stop them.) Since we guarantee (by a simple, yet clever rule how permissions might be assigned) that no person can impersonate /...\ became kinda confusing in our context.  After all the server is virtually there even though physically not. (Another - related - confusion might be interesting to readers looking at it from a legal background: in such a network new objects are created at all nodes running the creating application
Steve Phillips [LibreList] Re: Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-15 14:07:49
easier! --Steven On Oct 15, 2015 12:08 PM, "Francis Irving" < francis@flourish.org > wrote: Hello!    News stuff sounds really interesting!   I'm going to do a session on decentralized file sync/backup tools. Get everyone's recommendations in groups with postit notes, and collectively /...\ opportunity to create positive societal change in many areas and that is the reason I volunteered to help.   One of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are censorship proof, that /...\ change things we also need to give people the information and data to accurately asses our problems and challenge the status quo.I am interested in changing this and exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
Louise Ishka [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-03 08:38:06
like it is going to tie it in with okfestival. Please go to  https://github.com/No9/peerconf-2013/issues/1#issuecomment-31490267 and pass on some thoughts if your interested.  Thanks --- Original Message --- From: "Eric Mill" <eric@konklone.com> Sent: 3 January 2014 02:59 To: redecentralize@librelist.com Subject: Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects /...\ Jacob Cook < jacob@jcook.cc > wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 It certainly sounds like an interesting proposition. I've been holding off because Docker hasn't yet been reliably working on the Pi, but it sounds like it is getting better all the time and should be considered /...\ looking into this more closely in the coming months. Jacob Cook <jacob@jcook.cc> https://jcook.cc On 02/01/14 06:55 PM, maze@strahlungsfrei.de wrote: > Interesting you mention using Docker and arkOS. With Docker finally >  working on Raspberry Pi, I wanted to ask Jacob Cook what he thinks
Stephan Tual [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-24 22:15:06
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-16 11:31:17
schrieb Francis Irving: > Hello! > > News stuff sounds really interesting! > > I'm going to do a session on decentralized file sync/backup tools. Get > everyone's recommendations in groups with postit notes, and collectively > file bugs and improve documentation. > > What tools do people /...\ societal change > in many areas and that is the reason I volunteered to help. >> >> One > of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news > publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are > censorship /...\ things we also > need to give people the information and data to accurately asses our > problems and challenge the status quo.I am interested in changing this > and exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is interested come and > say hello. Asides from this I have
Francis Irving [LibreList] Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-15 20:07:43
opportunity to create positive societal change in many areas and that is the reason I volunteered to help.   One of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are censorship proof, that remove /...\ change things we also need to give people the information and data to accurately asses our problems and challenge the status quo.I am interested in changing this and exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
holger krekel [LibreList] any meeting point for tonight? 2015-10-16 08:18:38
opportunity to create positive societal change in many areas and that is the reason I volunteered to help. > > One of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are censorship proof, that /...\ change things we also need to give people the information and data to accurately asses our problems and challenge the status quo.I am interested in changing this and exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
Jeremie Miller [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Yesterday's London meet-up 2014-01-08 06:03:22
Holger's cc wasn't included so maybe you can forward, but I'd be very interested in getting the telehash community involved in what you're talking about, I believe that's exactly what we've built towards as a p2p framework and now have working /...\ Ross Jones wrote: >> For the benefit of those of us that couldn’t make it, but might be >> interested in events in Germany … could you elucidate? > > Yes. > > At last year's Europython Holger Krekel (cc'd) gave a keynote titled /...\ conference tweeted at me during his talk telling > me I should "get in touch with this guy" (knowing my interest in P2P). > > We exchanged emails and a group of us met for a P2P sprint in November > 2013 working in small groups on various
Jacob Cook [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 19:00:50
BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 It certainly sounds like an interesting proposition. I've been holding off because Docker hasn't yet been reliably working on the Pi, but it sounds like it is getting better all the time and should be considered "stable" fairly soon /...\ looking into this more closely in the coming months. Jacob Cook <jacob@jcook.cc> https://jcook.cc On 02/01/14 06:55 PM, maze@strahlungsfrei.de wrote: > Interesting you mention using Docker and arkOS. With Docker finally > working on Raspberry Pi, I wanted to ask Jacob Cook what he thinks > about /...\ have a small one, and I could use this list's input about it. >> >> Basically, I am interested in making it easy for regular people >> to take advantage of the efficiencies of self-hosting, without >> having to know how that works
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Yesterday's London meet-up 2014-01-15 14:37:29
08/01/14 13:03, Jeremie Miller wrote: > Holger's cc wasn't included so maybe you can forward, but I'd be > very interested in getting the telehash community involved in what > you're talking about, I believe that's exactly what we've built > towards /...\ Ross Jones wrote: For the benefit of those >>>> of us that couldn’t make it, but might be interested in >>>> events in Germany … could you elucidate? > > Yes. > > At last year's Europython Holger Krekel /...\ conference tweeted at me during his talk > telling me I should "get in touch with this guy" (knowing my > interest in P2P). > > We exchanged emails and a group of us met for a P2P sprint in > November 2013 working in small groups
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 21:58:22
Jacob Cook < jacob@jcook.cc > wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 It certainly sounds like an interesting proposition. I've been holding off because Docker hasn't yet been reliably working on the Pi, but it sounds like it is getting better all the time and should be considered /...\ looking into this more closely in the coming months. Jacob Cook <jacob@jcook.cc> https://jcook.cc On 02/01/14 06:55 PM, maze@strahlungsfrei.de wrote: > Interesting you mention using Docker and arkOS. With Docker finally >  working on Raspberry Pi, I wanted to ask Jacob Cook what he thinks /...\ have a small one, and I could use this list's input about it. >> >> Basically, I am interested in making it easy for regular people >> to take advantage of the efficiencies of self-hosting, without >> having to know how that works
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Re: Trustworthy Contract Handling - Comparison Of Approaches 2014-08-15 17:46:37
their own >> and be self-verifiable through cryptographic signing. > > Thanks for your feedback. > > I see quite some interesting things in Drogulus. > > However I'm "sort of" skeptic when I read "crypto signing". This > term is too generic /...\ However an important part of a signature is in these schemes hidden > in the process: as a proof of integrity, we are interested in a > hash over the object's content. This proof should hold even if the > secret key was lost or published. > The drogulus /...\ about 2000 I started coding > around similar ideas. As the system majored, we ran into various > additional ideas. Maybe some are interesting or inspiration: > > Once we have the DHT, what do we do with it? I'd like it to handle > my conversation and business
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-05 16:13:36
Jacob Cook < jacob@jcook.cc > wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 It certainly sounds like an interesting proposition. I've been holding off because Docker hasn't yet been reliably working on the Pi, but it sounds like it is getting better all the time and should be considered /...\ looking into this more closely in the coming months. Jacob Cook <jacob@jcook.cc> https://jcook.cc On 02/01/14 06:55 PM, maze@strahlungsfrei.de wrote: > Interesting you mention using Docker and arkOS. With Docker finally >  working on Raspberry Pi, I wanted to ask Jacob Cook what he thinks /...\ have a small one, and I could use this list's input about it. >> >> Basically, I am interested in making it easy for regular people >> to take advantage of the efficiencies of self-hosting, without >> having to know how that works
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Search Tech Talk 2015-10-17 01:08:30
matter. I think it is one important task to build (decentralized, if possible) alternatives to Google search et al. This could be a very interesting talk to listen to, in my opinion.  So, a +1 from me. Would gladly attend your talk! Regards, Martin /...\ schrieb Hugh Barnard <hugh.barnard@gmail.com>: Hi folks Just to do a little 'expressions of [dis]interest' research. I have a talk on search engine tech fundamentals that I've given at a Raspberry Pi jam and a tech college. I feel that understanding/developing search is important for: - critical appraisal /...\ talk [no discussion of scaling-up, heavyweight discussion of parsers, tokenisers etc.] it's for people that want to start/know-a-little-more So would anyone be interested in hearing/engaging with this? Otherwise I can sit back and listen to a whole host if interesting stuff, my original plan. All the best Hugh
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] GNU Internet Stack / youbroketheinternet.org 2013-12-30 11:45:20
latter is what WebRTC solves for us. Looked up that HN thread on OkTurtles to see where the Namecoin conversation landed. Found an interesting idea at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6964090 I think it's interesting to look at what existing entities do when faced with DNS MITM and takedowns. The various /...\ somehow later. Francis On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 09:46:31PM -0600, Paul Frazee wrote: > No kidding about the diagram. > > Interesting statement on http://youbroketheinternet.org/map > > Because the web browser is so overladen with surveillance functionality > > such as cookies, invisible counters /...\ stack, > > > but the picture is too big.. ;) > > > > > > All in all a very interesting umbrella project. > > > > > > cheers, Benjamin. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Benjamin Heitmann
will.sch [LibreList] RDC 15 2015-10-15 13:25:28
opportunity to create positive societal change in many areas and that is the reason I volunteered to help. One of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are censorship proof, that remove bias /...\ change things we also need to give people the information and data to accurately asses our problems and challenge the status quo.I am interested in changing this and exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-13 21:04:47
would compromise the entire blockchain. Then what do you do, start over from zero with SHA3? I think the tech behind it is more interesting than Bitcoin itself. It reminds me of the web. Hypertext, browsers, and the new hybrid thin client model they led to was interesting. The internet /...\ certainly damn interesting. But pets.com and flooz? Not so much. I still need to take a deep, deep dive into the block chain technology. I get the very basic surface of it, but I am really curious about how it might be used as part of a solution
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-19 12:52:55
storage allocation in a distributed storage pool (or an idealized form of that problem). Their research was backed by Google, who obviously is very interested in storage allocation problems. But I don’t think it’s a monstrous leap to go from storage allocation problems to bandwidth, routing /...\ resources” and all can be moved or re-allocated. Many are dynamic rather than static resources. It’d be interesting to write these authors and ask them directly what they think. Maybe I’ll do that. If you’ve been reading the other thread /...\ have a coordinator that coordinates without knowing *much* about what it is coordinating, via careful and clever use of cryptography. I was more interested in the over-arching theoretical question of whether some centralization is needed to achieve efficiency and the other things that are required for a good user
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Decentralised symposium 2014-02-27 11:01:47
BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, There's lots of interesting things going on but we're all so (physically) far apart. For example, I live in the middle-of-nowhere rural England and, earlier this week, Francis was in Liverpool (miles away from me) giving a talk about /...\ Distributed Autonomous Corporations (DACs). I can't get to Liverpool and I'm already in the UK. :-( Getting an interesting and diverse group of people together to share ideas about a particular subject is not a new idea - you just have to read Plato's dialogues to understand that /...\ Ancient Greeks had this concept nailed. Ergo, what can we do to bring physically remote people together to share interesting ideas..? How about something like an http://appear.in/redecentralize_symposium call with an advertised subject matter, someone recording the proceedings on their local machine and an hour or so for discussion
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 23:56:09
Interesting you mention using Docker and arkOS. With Docker finally working on Raspberry Pi, I wanted to ask Jacob Cook what he thinks about integrating Docker as a first class deployment method into arkOS. Running services securely sandboxed could greatly improve security, not to say that almost _anything /...\ right now, but I have a > small one, and I could use this list's input about it. > > Basically, I am interested in making it easy for regular people to > take advantage of the efficiencies of self-hosting, without having to > know how that works /...\ know each other. >> >> I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue >> and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which >> web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project >> called Grimwire
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] What *else* are people doing with blockchains? 2014-01-03 10:36:17
Also, just re-noticed Francis' post on DataCoin . The idea of hanging personal chains off of a central chain is interesting, and I guess mirrors the structure of the Internet, I just don't know of any other blockchain projects dealing with that idea. Pretty cool /...\ wrote: Oh, these are cool, thank you for that (and for typing all that out on your phone). The anti-spam thing is interesting, though it's not really taking advantage of the blockchain - you could implement the same strategy with USD, BTC is maybe just easier to script against /...\ Using a blockchain model for electronic voting seems very interesting, it's a shame that it hasn't publicly advanced beyond iamsatoshi's rough blog post  and Agora's private draft . That's something to watch for in 2014, I think. -- Eric
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-05 13:59:28
been under the impression that it's not hard to decentralize identity per se.  (Use a canonical hash proofing some interesting property. The property could be simply a key or better a certificate proofing additional information together with the key.) What's hard to decentralize would be human /...\ money before I can spend it or I can't spend it.  What am I missing? This reputation system would be interesting to me.  But I can't find much about it. So if I wanted to build applications like that one on scuttlebutt... possible /...\ been under the impression that it's not hard to decentralize identity per se.  (Use a canonical hash proofing some interesting property. The property could be simply a key or better a certificate proofing additional information together with the key.) What's hard to decentralize would be human
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-06 08:53:52
been under the impression that it's not hard to decentralize identity per se.  (Use a canonical hash proofing some interesting property. The property could be simply a key or better a certificate proofing additional information together with the key.) What's hard to decentralize would be human-meaningful /...\ money before I can spend it or I can't spend it.  What am I missing? This reputation system would be interesting to me.  But I can't find much about it. So if I wanted to build applications like that one on scuttlebutt... possible?  How would /...\ been under the impression that it's not hard to decentralize identity per se.  (Use a canonical hash proofing some interesting property. The property could be simply a key or better a certificate proofing additional information together with the key.) What's hard to decentralize would be human-meaningful
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello ! 2013-12-08 22:12:36
Oooo,  http://cozy.io/ looks interesting! We should interview you :) What state is it at? I'm looking for a page telling me what apps work out the box now. On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Benjamin ANDRE < ben@cozycloud.cc > wrote: Hello to the mailing /...\ explaining that "personal cloud" is a good way to influence the "neutrality of platforms" :-) The text will be in french, but if anyone is interested to help, I would be happy to share the document in english in order to have as many contributions as possible. ping me if interested
Hugh Barnard [LibreList] Search Tech Talk 2015-10-16 14:23:31
folks Just to do a little 'expressions of [dis]interest' research. I have a talk on search engine tech fundamentals that I've given at a Raspberry Pi jam and a tech college. I feel that understanding/developing search is important for: - critical appraisal of current engines - building 'honest' engines /...\ talk [no discussion of scaling-up, heavyweight discussion of parsers, tokenisers etc.] it's for people that want to start/know-a-little-more So would anyone be interested in hearing/engaging with this? Otherwise I can sit back and listen to a whole host if interesting stuff, my original plan. All the best Hugh
Jos Poortvliet [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] connecting 2015-09-17 08:09:46
ownCloud Conf is over I'm trying to wrap things up. There was > one > > announcement I think you folk find interesting: https://owncloud.org/c > onnect/ > > > > They use Pagekite.  They could use Tor.  Tor is very nice for this /...\ need to > deal with dynamic DNS or stupid ADSL IP address changes.  It just works. Oh, that is an interesting point, yes. And with the .onion domain, one can be reached from the 'normal' web, too? Hey, I will create an issue for this, but - please /...\ business, while > we're setting up the real GNU Internet.  Downside: it creates a SPoF > that will become more interesting for FVEY to attack once every activist > on Earth will give the finger to GoDaddy or StartSSL and switch to > automated annoyance ripper LetsEncrypt
juh [GG] Re: Redecentralize Radar, our super picky usable app directory 2017-02-28 23:20:00
usable, it seems you disagree with > it's creator about whether signal is decentralized > https://whispersystems.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/ this is an interesting read. It says that innovation needs some kind of centralization, because of the pace of development. All users like to have a fast development which improves /...\ board so that the infrastructure is neither controlled by the state nor by corporations. Especially b. was and is criticized in Germany by special interest groups that want to privatize the entire public sector. Their success is undeniable. Germany today is nearly completely private property. I think that this /...\ front line. We have to fight back private interest in the net. And because this is contrary to the individualised ethos of most western developers (I don't want to say libertarianism) it is not happening. Instead things like bitcoin come up which fuel the next decade of predator capitalism
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello ! 2013-12-09 00:40:42
cheers ! Benjamin ANDRE - +33 (0)6 86 25 36 66 - Cozy.io 2013/12/8 Francis Irving < francis@flourish.org > Oooo,  http://cozy.io/ looks interesting! We should interview you :) What state is it at? I'm looking for a page telling me what apps work /...\ explaining that "personal cloud" is a good way to influence the "neutrality of platforms" :-) The text will be in french, but if anyone is interested to help, I would be happy to share the document in english in order to have as many contributions as possible. ping me if interested
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Yesterday's London meet-up 2014-01-08 10:49:44
08/01/14 10:14, Ross Jones wrote: > For the benefit of those of us that couldn’t make it, but might be > interested in events in Germany … could you elucidate? > Yes. At last year's Europython Holger Krekel (cc'd) gave a keynote titled /...\ Buddies at the conference tweeted at me during his talk telling me I should "get in touch with this guy" (knowing my interest in P2P). We exchanged emails and a group of us met for a P2P sprint in November 2013 working in small groups on various different /...\ accommodation and plenty of Alphorns close by - check out the photos.) The provisional dates are Sunday, March 16th -> Friday, 21st. If you're interested in attending drop me and/or Holger (cc'd) a line. Hope this makes things clearer and I'm more than happy to answer any questions
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Search Tech Talk 2015-10-17 01:09:45
Hugh Barnard wrote: Hi folks Just to do a little 'expressions of [dis]interest' research.   I have a talk on search engine tech fundamentals that I've given at a Raspberry Pi jam and a tech college. I feel that understanding/developing search is important for:   - critical appraisal /...\ discussion of scaling-up, heavyweight discussion of parsers, tokenisers etc.] it's for people that want to start/know-a-little-more   So would anyone be interested in hearing/engaging with this? Otherwise I can sit back and listen to a whole host if interesting stuff, my original plan.   All the best Hugh
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-02 15:59:09
word "feudal". I've been exchanging emails with an old school friend who (surprisingly to me at least) is interested in P2P. Here's a quote from a recent (private) exchange via email about the Europython talk: "Consider my slide about hierarchy and power: it works when /...\ organise UK Python community stuff - so I get very little time to work on it; this needs to change). I'd be interested to know how you'd see this sort of decentralised / peer to peer work being funded. The best plan I can come up with is to save /...\ money and then take some months off (likely around March next year). Once again, congratulations on such an interesting and thought provoking blog post..! All the best, Nicholas. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT3Py6AAoJEP0qBPaYQbb6UQMH/icGQvgEmLLsEczPP4pS1vvz gRWMf4MLeW8ROLR1+Xp+NtiTk85chDYmtXOndTc7mdR1IKUC5PbSiosuhR8Pk1aH p9dtuzO9IVbn608KwbRTjtQjgEDzZysm1q8JNlfj64x2NtJP2h22yGMpvhoOwwLB AJUJOQaGfAk3t9MQBouQ3Ocm/wV6RV4/hiTW0C3e7q4F7bJLdmfDR8zlf2X03d1b usLTnIeTnIl0MYt6q9TotCUZMeyeYwp0SrKG0S5qfc1oqYIODXfHBUrLLM5PMhPW 7TaZ
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Re: Trustworthy Contract Handling - Comparison Of Approaches 2014-08-07 11:31:57
drogulus are designed to stand on their own and be > self-verifiable through cryptographic signing. Thanks for your feedback. I see quite some interesting things in Drogulus. However I'm "sort of" skeptic when I read "crypto signing". This term is too generic /...\ crypto. However an important part of a signature is in these schemes hidden in the process: as a proof of integrity, we are interested in a hash over the object's content. This proof should hold even if the secret key was lost or published. > > An item stored /...\ that. See: in about 2000 I started coding around similar ideas. As the system majored, we ran into various additional ideas. Maybe some are interesting or inspiration: Once we have the DHT, what do we do with it? I'd like it to handle my conversation and business. Publications, private
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello ! 2013-12-09 00:08:01
explaining that "personal cloud" is a good way to influence the "neutrality of platforms" :-) The text will be in french, but if anyone is interested to help, I would be happy to share the document in english in order to have as many contributions as possible. ping me if interested
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 12:31:08
Mill wrote: > Not to drag this out, but would you mind posting a link to something about > Telegram's travails? I'm interested. > > There's the potential for a dangerous wave of slickly designed messaging > apps that adopt the mantle of security without truly prioritizing /...\ decentralization projects. > > > > > > As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are > > quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need > > good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-11-29 21:03:37
long as nobody take's the piss to promote something closed commercial or their own product etc... has to be someone with a genuine interest interviewing someone they don't know. On 29 Nov 2014, at 20:41, Virgil Griffith < i@virgil.gr > wrote: I'd also like /...\ that are difficult to explain in two sentences or a thirty second sound bite, and I think people would find an interview with very interesting! Andrew
Virgil Griffith [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-11-29 13:21:14
nobody take's the piss t o promote something closed commercial or their own product etc... has to be someone with a genuine interest interviewing someone they don't know. On 29 Nov 2014, at 20:41, Virgil Griffith < i@virgil.gr > wrote: I'd also like to see Urbit /...\ that are difficult to explain in two sentences or a thirty second sound bite, and I think people would find an interview with very interesting! Andrew
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-11-29 21:50:39
nobody take's the piss t o promote something closed commercial or their own product etc... has to be someone with a genuine interest interviewing someone they don't know. On 29 Nov 2014, at 20:41, Virgil Griffith < i@virgil.gr > wrote: I'd also like to see Urbit /...\ that are difficult to explain in two sentences or a thirty second sound bite, and I think people would find an interview with very interesting! Andrew
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] february meetup 2014-02-03 09:04:42
here, having recently relocated from North Carolina, but as I get a little more into the tech scene I plan to spread around some interest. There is a huge amount of technology stuff here (not quite as much as the Bay up North, but a lot), so I'm sure /...\ there will be interested people. On Feb 3, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Francis Irving <francis@flourish.org> wrote: > You should totally organize a meetup in your area! > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:04:56AM -0800, Adam Ierymenko wrote: >> Wish
Ximin Luo [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 22:46:58
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 17:53:18
drag this out, but would you mind posting a link to something about Telegram's travails? I'm interested. > >     There's the potential for a dangerous wave of slickly designed messaging apps that adopt the mantle of security without truly prioritizing /...\ describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement
Ximin Luo [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-03-01 10:22:03
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-06 08:34:56
calculate a trust > value. Still this calculation of "trust value" I did not find. Or did not understand. I'm always interested in such things. > The thing you seem to be describing is certainly quite complex, Actually it's not. Undergrad CS students took usually about /...\ Wittenberger > <Joerg.Wittenberger@softeyes.net> wrote: >> Am 03.09.2014 01:25, schrieb Paul Frazee: >>> For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, >>> https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt. >>> >>> >> Got one question here: this seems
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-05 14:13:39
money before I can spend it or I can't spend it.  What am I missing? This reputation system would be interesting to me.  But I can't find much about it. So if I wanted to build applications like that one on scuttlebutt... possible?  How would /...\ been under the impression that it's not hard to decentralize identity per se.  (Use a canonical hash proofing some interesting property. The property could be simply a key or better a certificate proofing additional information together with the key.) What's hard to decentralize would be human-meaningful
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-09 13:51:08
SHA1 A Pythonista buddy Tarek has written about de-Googling / de-Facebooking his life (he's works for Mozilla): http://ziade.org/2013/06/24/shutting-down-facebook-amp-google/ Maybe some interesting stuff in there... N. On 09/12/13 13:22, Francis Irving wrote: > Whats the list of services you're using instead of Google ones /...\ have replaced almost all > of the Google services I used with self-hosted solutions that I > control. > > I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to > centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and > experience I've gleaned in trying
Janislav Malahov [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-08 11:23:03
might be possible and unique selling points of decentralization. I would love volunteers to help. Those who've spoken up already and anyone else interested - let's get together on a planning call. Please add your name in the doc ( http://piratepad.nl/rdc ) and let me know what times /...\ organise a redecentralize conference >> THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. >> >> It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s >> been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the >> evolving conversation about
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-19 12:22:38
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1:30 AM, David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: It
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-19 10:37:43
London) meetup?  The details are at  https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/redecentralize-january-london-meetup-registration-9841361778 (or just turn up ;) ). Failing that we’re canvassing for interesting posts for the new community-contributed blog in January, if you are that way inclined/have time. Ross. On 19 Dec 2013, at 10:27, Richard /...\ list of the ideas made at > the last London meetup. > > It’d be great if whoever has an interest in any of them just > picked them up and ran with them, although I believe Nick may have > claimed the organising
Jon Spriggs [GG] OggCamp 2017-03-07 14:36:00
organisers of OggCamp this year, and I was wondering whether there was any interest from the Redecentralize team to attend or have some kind of formal presence there? OggCamp ( http://OggCamp.org ) is a large free culture unconference in the UK. This year, it's on 19th and 20th August /...\ Public Radio, and ... possibly Redecentralize? to explain to people what they do, why they're there and how to get involved. If you're interested, please let me know! All the best, Jon --- Jon "The Nice Guy" Spriggs @jontheniceguy everywhere... https://jon.sprig.gs
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-10 01:52:00
That's be a great blog post! Your deadline is the end of the holidays - so say January 2nd? Audience is 1) power users* interested in changing to decentralized solutions, 2) in so doing, any developers / product designers reading to learn pain points big and small that need addressing. Markdown /...\ replaced almost all of the Google services I > > used with self-hosted solutions that I control. > > > > I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to > > centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and > > experience
Jeremie Miller [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] London panelist? 2014-04-25 08:01:11
there's anyone in our community that might be able to join, wish I was in the area, sounds super interesting! Jer On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Stephan Tual < stephan@ethereum.org > wrote: Hello Everyone, my first message to this list so please be gentle /...\ innovative new products on a censorship and collusion-resistant foundation." Potential use cases at  https://medium.com/p/4790bf5f7743 Recently our CTO wrote this very interesting article on a potential 'web 3.0', a decentralized web: http://insightsintoamodernworld.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/apps-what-web-30-looks-like.html   This gives us a 'holy trinit y' of decentralized logic, decentralized storage
Richard D. Bartlett [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 09:34:23
open-source projects can adapt the 'visionary designer' model (e.g. Apple) to decentralised projects. Feel free to contact me off-list if you're interested :) Warm regards from Aotearoa New Zealand, Rich On 28 February 2014 09:20, Francis Irving < francis@flourish.org > wrote: Hi all! Having interviewed many geeks /...\ more design and user experience people in decentralization projects. As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement. We are going
Pierre Ozoux [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] to explain decentralisation with a simple card game 2015-09-07 19:09:43
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] connecting 2015-09-16 16:15:21
ownCloud Conf is over I'm trying to wrap things up. There was one > announcement I think you folk find interesting: https://owncloud.org/c onnect/ > They use Pagekite. They could use Tor. Tor is very nice for this. I use it to connect to my parents' computer from /...\ phase out SSL business, while we're setting up the real GNU Internet. Downside: it creates a SPoF that will become more interesting for FVEY to attack once every activist on Earth will give the finger to GoDaddy or StartSSL and switch to automated annoyance ripper LetsEncrypt. == hk -----BEGIN
Ira [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-08 14:29:11
might be possible and unique selling points of decentralization. I would love volunteers to help. Those who've spoken up already and anyone else interested - let's get together on a planning call. Please add your name in the doc ( http://piratepad.nl/rdc ) and let me know what times /...\ organise a redecentralize conference >> THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. >> >> It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s >> been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the >> evolving conversation about
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] What *else* are people doing with blockchains? 2014-01-02 12:02:15
these are cool, thank you for that (and for typing all that out on your phone). The anti-spam thing is interesting, though it's not really taking advantage of the blockchain - you could implement the same strategy with USD, BTC is maybe just easier to script against. Using /...\ blockchain model for electronic voting seems very interesting, it's a shame that it hasn't publicly advanced beyond iamsatoshi's rough blog post  and Agora's private draft . That's something to watch for in 2014, I think. -- Eric
Paul Frazee [GG] Re: Zeronet and Twister anyone 2016-04-07 10:23:00
Cool, Juh. What's your involvement with the projects? ZeroNet interests me more, so I dug into the FAQ. Here's the interesting bits: It only uses BTC's crypto primitives, but not it's blockchain. I does use namecoin, though. https://zeronet.readthedocs.org/en/latest/faq/#does-zeronet-uses-bitcoins-blockchain Site addresses *are* wallets, but they
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 01:16:33
project going on right now, but I have a small one, and I could use this list's input about it. Basically, I am interested in making it easy for regular people to take advantage of the efficiencies of self-hosting, without having to know how that works. Some background /...\ know each other. I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project called Grimwire that's in this realm. I'm also involved
ben [GG] Re: Public Money until tomorrow evening: 2016-04-10 14:54:00
those two axes since on your personal cloud you can aggregate safely much more data than Google will ever have : health, finance, center of interests... The services can thus be more relevant, more proactive, and more seamless. You will be able to choose the AI you want to plug /...\ system that empowers the individual to take back of their data, in order to be really empowered by their data working for their interest, and to benefit from an open and profuse market of services. 2/ Big Data and P2P : peer to peer is the core of a decentralization
Richard Marr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-19 14:26:27
details are at  https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/redecentralize-january-london-meetup-registration-9841361778 (or just turn up ;) ). Failing that we’re canvassing for interesting posts for the new community-contributed blog in January, if you are that way inclined/have time. Ross. On 19 Dec 2013, at 10:27, Richard Marr < richard.marr@gmail.com /...\ list of the ideas made at > the last London meetup. > > It’d be great if whoever has an interest in any of them just > picked them up and ran with them, although I believe Nick may have > claimed the organising
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-22 13:51:28
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: Trustworthy Contract Handling - Comparison Of Approaches 2014-08-03 14:56:05
sorry for following up my own post. (So far I got some responses, though not via the list.) I gather that this might be interesting to the list too: Am 29.07.2014 09:57, schrieb "Jörg F. Wittenberger": > Hi all, > > I'm gathering infos /...\ here: http://ball.askemos.org/?_v=wiki&_id=1786 Not related to Drogulus but to trustworthy (a.k.a. trustless) contract handling, one more note. I ran into codius. That's interesting too; see the white paper: https://github.com/codius/codius/wiki/Smart-Oracles:-A-Simple,-Powerful-Approach-to-Smart-Contracts#multiple-untrusted-host-model > for example, one could use a 7-of-10 scheme that allows for up to three
Ira [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-07 21:31:57
might be possible and unique selling points of decentralization. I would love volunteers to help. Those who've spoken up already and anyone else interested - let's get together on a planning call. Please add your name in the doc ( http://piratepad.nl/rdc ) and let me know what times /...\ organise a redecentralize conference >> THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. >> >> It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s >> been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the >> evolving conversation about
Jos Poortvliet [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-09 11:33:06
Bastien Guerry [LibreList] FLOSS4P2P: Call for Participation 2015-02-18 10:28:26
CBPP communities further. In this workshop, we will gather those working around the decentralized FLOSS that could help CBPP/P2P communities. Hackers, academics, activists and interested stakeholders are welcome. **When** March 16-17th 2015 **Where** Fab Lab London http://fablablondon.org **Call for Proposals** We welcome proposals for: Lightning talks /...\ wish to attend the event. The scholarship will cover participant’s travel and subsistence cost, up to €400. If you are interested in applying for the scholarship, please email: lu.yang@surrey.ac.uk before 28 February 2015, with a paragraph stating why you think your FLOSS is relevant, plus a short
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] GNU Internet Stack / youbroketheinternet.org 2013-12-29 21:46:31
kidding about the diagram.  Interesting statement on  http://youbroketheinternet.org/map Because the web browser is so overladen with surveillance functionality such as cookies, invisible counters, e-tags and plenty of Javascript doing what the server tells it to. Now comes WebRTC which relies on web servers /...\ assigns various projects to different levels of the stack, > but the picture is too big.. ;) > > All in all a very interesting umbrella project. > > cheers, Benjamin. > > > -- > Benjamin Heitmann, BSc, MSc > PhD Researcher > Unit for Information Mining and Retrieval (UIMR
Mikko Kotila [GG] Re: (probably) the world's highest solar powered mesh network and offline media server setup 2016-09-09 20:47:00
view. There are more than 1,000,000 NGO organizations on the ground. Many of these NGOs are not aligned with the long term interests of the communities, and in many cases this is not obvious initially. Money coming to NGOs is increasingly attached. Few years ago a friend /...\ than that. I mean we might have great appreciation for the culture, but at the same time we might be ambitious with our own interest. Even when there is no extra ambition, it is incredibly hard to understand causalities related with mixing disruptive technology and ancient
Jonny Leroy [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-27 13:02:02
Hackathon" for security / privacy tools happening this weekend in San Francisco: https://openitp.org/openitp/ux-sprint-for-security-privacy-tools.html I can't make it, but there may be interesting people / projects to talk to coming out of it -jonny On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Francis Irving < francis@flourish.org > wrote /...\ more design and user experience people in decentralization projects. As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement. We are going
Stephan Tual [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] squatconf 2014-10-20 01:11:02
Looks really interesting. Thanks for that. On 20 October 2014 at 01:00:07, Dominic Tarr ( dominic.tarr@gmail.com ) wrote: hello redecentralizers If you happen to be handy to Paris in mid-december, then you may be interested in attending squatconf, or speaking there! It's an anarchist tech conf
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] GNU Internet Stack / youbroketheinternet.org 2013-12-30 11:42:22
somehow later. Francis On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 09:46:31PM -0600, Paul Frazee wrote: > No kidding about the diagram. > > Interesting statement on http://youbroketheinternet.org/map > > Because the web browser is so overladen with surveillance functionality > > such as cookies, invisible counters /...\ stack, > > > but the picture is too big.. ;) > > > > > > All in all a very interesting umbrella project. > > > > > > cheers, Benjamin. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Benjamin Heitmann
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 09:48:38
drag this out, but would you mind posting a link to something about Telegram's travails? I'm interested. There's the potential for a dangerous wave of slickly designed messaging apps that adopt the mantle of security without truly prioritizing it. I had a frustrating interaction with /...\ design and user experience people in decentralization projects. > > As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello ! 2013-12-08 21:43:29
explaining that "personal cloud" is a good way to influence the "neutrality of platforms" :-) The text will be in french, but if anyone is interested to help, I would be happy to share the document in english in order to have as many contributions as possible. ping me if interested
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 09:55:06
eric@konklone.com > wrote: Not to drag this out, but would you mind posting a link to something about Telegram's travails? I'm interested. There's the potential for a dangerous wave of slickly designed messaging apps that adopt the mantle of security without truly prioritizing /...\ design and user experience people in decentralization projects. > > As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 15:20:26
Mill wrote: > Not to drag this out, but would you mind posting a link to something about > Telegram's travails? I'm interested. > > There's the potential for a dangerous wave of slickly designed messaging > apps that adopt the mantle of security without truly prioritizing /...\ decentralization projects. > > > > > > As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are > > quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need > > good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Hello ! 2013-12-08 22:26:36
explaining that "personal cloud" is a good way to influence the "neutrality of platforms" :-) The text will be in french, but if anyone is interested to help, I would be happy to share the document in english in order to have as many contributions as possible. ping me if interested
Scott Jenson [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2013-12-29 19:26:39
basic, low level want for devices to broadcast and be found. I'm assuming BT4 is the best approach today but I'm interested in other approaches.  Scott On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Jacob Cook < jacob@jcook.cc > wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash /...\ know each other. > > I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue > and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which > web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project > called Grimwire that's in this realm
Jos Poortvliet [LibreList] connecting 2015-09-16 19:14:02
Filipe Farinha [LibreList] Webcasts / Periscope 2015-10-16 21:45:43
Will there be recordings or webcasts of the sessions? I'm hugely interested in following the event, but being in Macau makes it infeasible to drop by London on this occasion. If there aren't any 'official' webcasts, will it be possible for participants to Periscope the sessions
Benjamin Heitmann [LibreList] RDC 15 Session idea: The End of Safe Harbour: The beginning of privacy as a business model ? 2015-10-16 09:14:48
would like to join in discussing ideas for sessions at the conference. Initially I was planning to see if there is an interest in a session on “decentralised personalisation”.  You might have seen my proposal in the list of examples.  However, in the light of last
Anne Radl [GG] New grant fund for decentralising tech! 2018-07-03 05:31:00
your interest in creating equitable systems that shift power to people and communities has led you to develop a tech innovation that does just that - please considering applying to Social Tech Trust's new grant fund - Tech to Unite Us! We've been thinking about the affordances of tech
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Tell me decentralization news! 2014-04-24 23:27:58
thanks for the focus on this project, will be very interesting when we will include a mail server in Cozy ! Benjamin ANDRE - +33 (0)6 86 25 36 66 - Cozy.io 2014-04-23 15:52 GMT+02:00 Eric Mill < eric@konklone.com > : Josh Tauberer's Mail
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 11:06:01
David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow
Joakim Stai [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 20:09:09
David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 12:02:36
David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow
David Geib [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 15:27:01
David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 12:31:33
David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow
David Geib [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 15:48:55
David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow
Odinn Cyberguerrilla [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-07 02:54:41
released a development version of a new piece of software today that may > be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide > comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. > > http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ > https://github.com/zrm/snow > this
Paul Trevithick [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-07 10:08:55
odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote: >> I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may >> be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide >> comments or bug reports it would be appreciated
David Burns [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-03 11:38:08
blog, and my first post includes some thoughts I've wanted to get down for a while: http://adamierymenko.com/decentralization-i-want-to-believe/ Adam, your blog post interested me a lot. Best of luck with your efforts. One quibbly question: >efficiency, security, decentralization, pick two.  Assuming certain sorts of threats
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-04 15:58:16
blog, and my first post includes some thoughts I've wanted to get down for a while: http://adamierymenko.com/decentralization-i-want-to-believe/ Adam, your blog post interested me a lot. Best of luck with your efforts. One quibbly question: >efficiency, security, decentralization, pick two.  Assuming certain sorts of threats, decentralization
Daniel Maher [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Blog lisbon? 2014-08-06 11:36:19
/redecentralize/redecentralize-website/tree/gh-pages/_posts/blog that'd be very useful. And details of the next meetup would be great on the wiki too. > > I'm particularly interested if you'd be willing to do more coverage of remotestorage I'd be glad to contribute content pertaining to our efforts here in Paris
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Blog lisbon? 2014-08-06 11:17:35
very useful. And details of the next meetup would be great on the wiki too. >> >> I'm particularly interested if you'd be willing to do more coverage of remotestorage > > I'd be glad to contribute content pertaining to our efforts here
Ximin Luo [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Zooko's triangle vs. Gödel incompleteness the 2014-08-21 13:20:19
problem for someone better at math than me. Though the result > should be tremendous interesting to many people and projects on this list. > > The challenge: Show how precisely the challenge seen in Zooko's triangle > is different from precondition of Gödel's incompleteness theorem
Daniel Maher [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Lantern anti-censorship tool 2014-08-18 14:45:21
they've just chosen to abandon any pre-text to such altogether. That it only proxies a pre-defined set of sites is an interesting element in the equation. It fits well within the narrow scope of their stated goal, but I worry about the content of that list
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 18:26:32
Anish Mangal wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Go right ahead! :) > > Yes, in the village case (#2), they are more interested in connecting > their village (i.e. residents with one another) locally and to other > neighbouring villages through wifi and directional antennas. Internet is > secondary
David Burns [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-20 12:49:31
push the analogy too far, as custom, law, contracts, etc. are only vaguely similar to software. I would expect at least a few very interesting and annoying differences, though maybe also some surprising and useful isomorphisms. Dave
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-21 11:23:12
push the analogy too far, as custom, law, contracts, etc. are only vaguely similar to software. I would expect at least a few very interesting and annoying differences, though maybe also some surprising and useful isomorphisms. That's pretty much our experience. You don't want to push the analogy
Stephan Tual [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-22 14:41:22
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Zooko's triangle vs. Gödel incompleteness the 2014-08-25 10:58:38
problem for someone better at math than me. Though the result >> should be tremendous interesting to many people and projects on this list. >> >> The challenge: Show how precisely the challenge seen in Zooko's triangle >> is different from precondition
David Geib [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-02 23:05:21
attackers) and with schemes to share resources (bandwidth, sometimes > disk-space). This is where the reputation system gets involved. > > For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, > https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-02 18:25:57
network (DoSers, attackers) and with schemes to share resources (bandwidth, sometimes disk-space). This is where the reputation system gets involved. For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt . On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Dominic Tarr < dominic.tarr@gmail.com
Dominic Tarr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-02 16:55:31
attackers) and with schemes to share resources (bandwidth, sometimes > disk-space). This is where the reputation system gets involved. > > For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, > https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt.
Dominic Tarr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-03 11:04:25
resources (bandwidth, sometimes >> > disk-space). This is where the reputation system gets involved. >> > >> > For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, >> > https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt.
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-04 15:07:09
attackers) and with schemes to share resources (bandwidth, > sometimes disk-space). This is where the reputation system gets involved. > > For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, > https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt. OK, timeout. I'm just recovering from a cold. Huge backlog becoming
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-04 15:45:37
schrieb Paul Frazee: > For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, > https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt. > > Got one question here: this seems to replicate data. Does it protect against malicious updates too? To illustrate: I'm currently working on some simple payment system
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-04 12:45:35
Wittenberger < Joerg.Wittenberger@softeyes.net > wrote: Am 03.09.2014 01:25, schrieb Paul Frazee: > For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, > https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt . > > Got one question here: this seems to replicate data.  Does it protect against malicious updates
Dominic Tarr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-05 06:51:59
Wittenberger <Joerg.Wittenberger@softeyes.net> wrote: > Am 03.09.2014 01:25, schrieb Paul Frazee: >> For some interesting reading, I'll refer you to Dominic's project, >> https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt. >> >> > > Got one question here: this seems to replicate data. Does it protect
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-09 11:30:40
application at the place. It is the unit of replication. I.e., a SSB feed corresponds to a place. Message&message is another interesting topic. We have two: http://askemos.org/index.html?_v=search&_id=1302 > The id is just the hash > of the public key used to sign the messages
Michael Rogers [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-09-12 17:14:40
these other things can be tackled or the problem space can be > redefined around them. I totally agree. Perhaps Tor would be an interesting example to think about, because it's decentralised at the level of resource allocation but centralised at the level of trust. The Tor directory authorities
holger krekel [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] squatconf 2014-10-20 10:47:25
happen to be handy to Paris in mid-december, Isn't this rather November 15th? > then you may be interested in attending squatconf, > or speaking there! Definitely, thanks again for the pointer, Dominic. > It's an anarchist tech conf. That's how conferences should always
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] squatconf 2014-10-20 11:53:14
Dominic Tarr wrote: > hello redecentralizers > > If you happen to be handy to Paris in mid-december, then you may be > interested in attending squatconf, or speaking there! > November the 15th according to the site. Unfortunately, I have family commitments that weekend otherwise I'd have
Dominic Tarr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] squatconf 2014-10-20 10:54:20
happen to be handy to Paris in mid-december, Isn't this rather November 15th? > then you may be interested in attending squatconf, > or speaking there! Definitely, thanks again for the pointer, Dominic. > It's an anarchist tech conf. That's how conferences should always
Dominic Tarr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] squatconf 2014-10-20 10:58:22
Dominic Tarr wrote: > hello redecentralizers > > If you happen to be handy to Paris in mid-december, then you may be > interested in attending squatconf, or speaking there! > November the 15th according to the site. Unfortunately, I have family commitments that weekend otherwise I'd have
Michiel de Jong [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-11-29 21:35:27
that are difficult to explain in two sentences or a thirty second sound bite, and I think people would find an interview with very interesting! Andrew
Virgil Griffith [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-11-29 12:41:27
that are difficult to explain in two sentences or a thirty second sound bite, and I think people would find an interview with very interesting! Andrew
Christoph Witzany [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-05 09:48:17
decided to organise a redecentralize conference THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the evolving conversation about the possibilities and concerns of decentralization. My hope
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-01 09:28:40
specifically, and it’s my personal opinion, I’ve *love* to see interviews done by members of the community with projects that interest them. I mean, I love both Francis and Ira, but equally I’d like to see different approaches to the interviews and more
Steve Phillips [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-01 02:23:24
personal opinion, I’ve *love* to see interviews done by members of the community with projects that interest them.  I mean, I love both Francis and Ira, but equally I’d like to see different approaches to the interviews and more
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-01 11:10:40
personal opinion, > I’ve *love* to see interviews done by members of the community > with projects that interest them. I mean, I love both Francis and > Ira, but equally I’d like to see different approaches to the > interviews and more of them
fernando.gs@gmail.com [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-02 11:17:15
personal opinion, >> I’ve *love* to see interviews done by members of the community >> with projects that interest them. I mean, I love both Francis and >> Ira, but equally I’d like to see different approaches to the >> interviews
Kiktron RAKO [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-12-02 11:37:56
personal opinion, >> I’ve *love* to see interviews done by members of the community >> with projects that interest them.  I mean, I love both Francis and >> Ira, but equally I’d like to see different approaches
mempko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The Cloud's Shadow on Grass Computing 2015-04-03 08:45:25
developers trying to make decentralized public communication systems have a huge hill to climb and they need resources that corporations are simply not interested in providing. I really feel for them!<br> <br> I heard ZeroTier One got some seed funding. This is great! However
ken Code [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-05 10:02:22
decided to organise a redecentralize conference THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the evolving conversation about the possibilities and concerns of decentralization. My hope
Steve Phillips [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-05 00:56:09
decided to organise a redecentralize conference THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the evolving conversation about the possibilities and concerns of decentralization. My hope
will schiller [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-05 12:42:29
decided to organise a redecentralize conference THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the evolving conversation about the possibilities and concerns of decentralization. My hope
Jos Poortvliet [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-06 17:18:37
Filipe Catraia [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-06 20:00:51
organise a redecentralize conference >> THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. >> >> It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s >> been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the >> evolving conversation about the possibilities
juh [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference, 17-18 Oct, London 2015-08-25 09:13:41
where the audience is big enough for our ego. We travel far to go to a conference where we meet people that share our interests. What are the models of our social interaction? Do we want to go back to the status quo ante? Do we want to make
Tristan Nitot [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralize Conference, 17-18 Oct, London 2015-08-25 15:33:59
audience is big > enough for our ego. We travel far to go to a conference where we meet > people that share our interests. What are the models of our social > interaction? > > Do we want to go back to the status quo ante? Do we want
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] connecting 2015-09-17 05:45:33
BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 09/17/2015 03:09 AM, Jos Poortvliet wrote: > > Oh, that is an interesting point, yes. And with the .onion > domain, one can be reached from the 'normal' web, too? > 'Normal' Web users only use DNS to resolve their names
Steve Phillips [LibreList] Re: Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-15 23:38:58
Syncthing on my laptop and phone to share files. It works quite nicely! Very interesting! How do your devices find each other? Any SSL cert issues? Is this an Android phone? Thanks. --Steven On Oct 15, 2015 10:18 PM, "J. Ryan Stinnett" < jryans@gmail.com > wrote
Eva Pascoe [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 Session idea: The End of Safe Harbour: The beginning of privacy as a business model ? 2015-10-16 10:55:10
would like to join in discussing ideas for sessions at the conference. Initially I was planning to see if there is an interest in a session on “decentralised personalisation”.  You might have seen my proposal in the list of examples
J. Ryan Stinnett [LibreList] Re: Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-16 07:00:59
wrote: >> ...I run Syncthing on my laptop and phone to share files. It works quite >> nicely! > > Very interesting! How do your devices find each other? Any SSL cert issues? > Is this an Android phone? Thanks. Syncthing uses both local network discovery (broadcast / multicast
Anish Mangal [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Webcasts / Periscope 2015-10-16 21:42:50
Filipe Farinha < filipe@ktorn.com > wrote: Hi all, Will there be recordings or webcasts of the sessions? I'm hugely interested in following the event, but being in Macau makes it infeasible to drop by London on this occasion. If there aren't any 'official' webcasts, will it be possible
Joakim Stai [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Webcasts / Periscope 2015-10-16 18:21:41
Filipe Farinha < filipe@ktorn.com > wrote: Hi all, Will there be recordings or webcasts of the sessions? I'm hugely interested in following the event, but being in Macau makes it infeasible to drop by London on this occasion. If there aren't any 'official' webcasts, will it be possible
will.sch [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Webcasts / Periscope 2015-10-16 15:17:45
Filipe Farinha < filipe@ktorn.com > wrote: Hi all, Will there be recordings or webcasts of the sessions? I'm hugely interested in following the event, but being in Macau makes it infeasible to drop by London on this occasion. If there aren't any 'official' webcasts, will it be possible
Joakim Stai [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Webcasts / Periscope 2015-10-17 11:19:48
Friday, 16 October 2015, Filipe Farinha < filipe@ktorn.com > wrote: Hi all, Will there be recordings or webcasts of the sessions? I'm hugely interested in following the event, but being in Macau makes it infeasible to drop by London on this occasion. If there aren't any 'official' webcasts
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Webcasts / Periscope 2015-10-17 11:55:30
Friday, 16 October 2015, Filipe Farinha < filipe@ktorn.com > wrote: Hi all, Will there be recordings or webcasts of the sessions? I'm hugely interested in following the event, but being in Macau makes it infeasible to drop by London on this occasion. If there aren't any 'official' webcasts
Filipe Farinha [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Webcasts / Periscope 2015-10-18 10:22:06
filipe@ktorn.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Will there be recordings or webcasts of the sessions? > > I'm hugely interested in following the event, but being in Macau > makes > it infeasible to drop by London on this occasion. > > If there aren
Ira [GG] Re: So centralized! 2016-04-07 05:59:00
Adrien, are you volunteering to set up & maintain a mailing / list forum? (Hooray!) Because if so, the one I'm interesting in getting for rdc is http://www.discourse.org/ . Will you set it up? I'm also currently trialling Teem, built on  http://swellrt.org/ - so would love
Adrien [GG] Re: So centralized! 2016-04-07 09:07:00
wrote: > Adrien, are you volunteering to set up & maintain a mailing / list > forum? (Hooray!) Because if so, the one I'm interesting in getting for > rdc is http://www.discourse.org/ . Will you set it up? Not really... but I don't need to do it, Pierre offered
Steve Phillips [GG] Re: Zeronet and Twister anyone 2016-04-07 12:06:00
sounds a lot like IPFS, which also seems to work well and is exciting. Other projects similar to those two it may be interesting to try are listed here:  https://www.reddit.com/r/ipfs/comments/3l701i/what_are_the_differencessimilarities_with_zeronet/
Ira [GG] Re: Hi and mailing lists 2016-04-28 06:39:00
squatconf but will be working instead :-/ Have fun Adam :) Madrid event should be good though, lot's going on and some really interesting groups coming to discuss participation and representation with amazing progress; as well as the redecentralize unconference bit ( http://dcentproject.eu/dcentmadrid/democracy-lab/open-call/ ) (!) Registration for all the things happening
Mikko Kotila [GG] Re: Which decentralized products _would_ you use day to day if they existed? Why? 2016-09-10 22:50:00
from being decentralized, so I guess something like git but completely decentralized. Websites is the bulk of the internet, so it would be very interesting to see more on decentralized self-publishing platforms. For personal use, cross-platform secure/private/anon messaging and calls would be fantastic
Danny Knestaut [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-09 14:15:09
cancelled my Google account and have replaced almost all of the Google services I used with self-hosted solutions that I control. I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and experience I've gleaned in trying
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-10 11:40:51
cancelled my Google account and have replaced almost all of the Google services I used with self-hosted solutions that I control. I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and experience I've gleaned in trying
Jan Kunkel [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-10 15:34:56
Google services I >>> used with self-hosted solutions that I control. >>> >>> I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to >>> centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and >>> experience
Jan Kunkel [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-11 22:18:27
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralization on Wikipedia 2013-12-13 23:15:34
more centralized, and so on. So probably, finding more detailed references for the things the New Yorker article mentions? Generally, BTW, do please mention interesting articles or videos here! I tweet them out from @redecentralize, and I'd rather have the ones that people want to read... Francis
Ira [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralization on Wikipedia 2013-12-14 22:14:43
more centralized, and so on. So probably, finding more detailed references for the things the New Yorker article mentions? Generally, BTW, do please mention interesting articles or videos here! I tweet them out from @redecentralize, and I'd rather have the ones that people want to read... Francis
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-15 17:07:41
list of the ideas made at > the last London meetup. > > It’d be great if whoever has an interest in any of them just > picked them up and ran with them, although I believe Nick may have > claimed the organising
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-09 13:22:03
cancelled my Google account and have replaced almost all of the Google services I used with self-hosted solutions that I control. I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and experience I've gleaned in trying
Danny Knestaut [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-10 10:16:04
cancelled my Google account and have replaced almost all of the Google services I used with self-hosted solutions that I control. I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and experience I've gleaned in trying
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello! 2013-12-10 17:36:48
cancelled my Google account and have replaced almost all of the Google services I used with self-hosted solutions that I control. I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and experience I've gleaned in trying
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralization on Wikipedia 2013-12-15 11:58:55
more centralized, and so on. So probably, finding more detailed references for the things the New Yorker article mentions? Generally, BTW, do please mention interesting articles or videos here! I tweet them out from @redecentralize, and I'd rather have the ones that people want to read... Francis
Ira [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-14 22:18:05
more easily sharable list of the ideas made at the last London meetup. It’d be great if whoever has an interest in any of them just picked them up and ran with them, although I believe Nick may have claimed the organising of a conference
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] A blog post 2013-12-18 18:41:47
Decentralization : which incentives for private companies to play the game ?" Another idea would be : "Strengths & dangers of personal data stores". Tell me if interested and when (late January would be fine). Decentralizly :-) Benjamin ANDRE - +33 (0)6 86 25 36 66 - Cozy.io 2013/12/18 Nicholas H.Tollervey < ntoll@ntoll.org > -----BEGIN
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-15 10:48:29
easily sharable list of the ideas made at > the last London meetup. > > It’d be great if whoever has an interest in any of them just > picked them up and ran with them, although I believe Nick may have > claimed the organising
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-02 12:20:44
code using a proof of validity stored in the Namecoin blockchain. And in the future, delivering code updates via the Avatar network itself. Really interested to see how this works out. Any opinions? [1] http://avatar.ai [2] http://sneakpeek.avatar.ai/technology.html [3] http://www.matasano.com/articles/javascript-cryptography/ Regards Martin
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] GNU Internet Stack / youbroketheinternet.org 2013-12-29 15:26:45
picture which assigns various projects to different levels of the stack, but the picture is too big.. ;) All in all a very interesting umbrella project. cheers, Benjamin. -- Benjamin Heitmann, BSc, MSc PhD Researcher Unit for Information Mining and Retrieval (UIMR) Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) NUI Galway, Ireland publications
Jacob Cook [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2013-12-29 17:24:16
know each other. > > I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue > and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which > web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project > called Grimwire that's in this realm
Richard Marr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-19 10:27:55
list of the ideas made at > the last London meetup. > > It’d be great if whoever has an interest in any of them just > picked them up and ran with them, although I believe Nick may have > claimed the organising
Ira [Email] There's more to decentralisation 2018-09-25 13:51:19.9682
love your thoughts and ideas on this and what we should all be doing next! One thing I've seen since which may be interesting to people is https://newsocialist.org.uk/decentralising-the-internet/ Thanks, Ira -- Irina Bolychevsky @shevski
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-19 10:41:46
list of the ideas made at > the last London meetup. > > It’d be great if whoever has an interest in any of them just > picked them up and ran with them, although I believe Nick may have > claimed the organising
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] GNU Internet Stack / youbroketheinternet.org 2013-12-30 01:49:27
assigns various projects to different levels of the stack, > but the picture is too big.. ;) > > All in all a very interesting umbrella project. > > cheers, Benjamin. > > > -- > Benjamin Heitmann, BSc, MSc > PhD Researcher > Unit for Information Mining and Retrieval (UIMR
Stefan Sayer [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 21:26:16
level want for devices > to broadcast and be found. I'm assuming BT4 is the best approach > today but I'm interested In BT4 (Bluetooth 4.0?), does this work over IP/DNS-SD+mDNS ("Bonjour")? > in other approaches. over IP, DNS-SD [0],[1] plus mDNS
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Applying User-Agent Behaviors in Web Applications to Enable Runtime Extension 2014-03-09 09:25:35
social extension of web applications in >> order to provide autonomy from hosting organizations. > > That "autonomy" piece caught my interest. After all, it's what > askemos.org is about. > >> If anybody has questions on the approach, feel free
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 13:18:13
Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote: Hey Adam, ZeroTier has been high on my watch-list. Very interesting project. I'm guessing because of the subscription model that it has some central coordinator? What I imagine doing with ZeroTier is running private web services and distributing the names (" http://couchdb.paul
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 12:40:57
Adam, ZeroTier has been high on my watch-list. Very interesting project. I'm guessing because of the subscription model that it has some central coordinator? What I imagine doing with ZeroTier is running private web services and distributing the names (" http://couchdb.paul ") among my virtual LAN. Is that feasible
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 10:51:29
Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote: Hey Adam, ZeroTier has been high on my watch-list. Very interesting project. I'm guessing because of the subscription model that it has some central coordinator? What I imagine doing with ZeroTier is running private web services and distributing the names (" http://couchdb.paul
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 11:40:41
Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote: Hey Adam, ZeroTier has been high on my watch-list. Very interesting project. I'm guessing because of the subscription model that it has some central coordinator? What I imagine doing with ZeroTier is running private web services and distributing the names (" http://couchdb.paul
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 13:46:47
Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote: Hey Adam, ZeroTier has been high on my watch-list. Very interesting project. I'm guessing because of the subscription model that it has some central coordinator? What I imagine doing with ZeroTier is running private web services and distributing the names (" http://couchdb.paul
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 11:50:49
Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote: Hey Adam, ZeroTier has been high on my watch-list. Very interesting project. I'm guessing because of the subscription model that it has some central coordinator? What I imagine doing with ZeroTier is running private web services and distributing the names (" http://couchdb.paul
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 13:53:30
Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote: Hey Adam, ZeroTier has been high on my watch-list. Very interesting project. I'm guessing because of the subscription model that it has some central coordinator? What I imagine doing with ZeroTier is running private web services and distributing the names (" http://couchdb.paul
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Yesterday's London meet-up 2014-01-08 10:14:27
benefit of those of us that couldn’t make it, but might be interested in events in Germany … could you elucidate? Thanks Ross On 8 Jan 2014, at 10:12, Nicholas H.Tollervey <ntoll@ntoll.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1
Jacob Cook [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Decentralization and antifragility 2014-01-14 10:16:12
into arkOS, which would be a great companion for upcoming XMPP server support. I read over your blog post as well, it raises some interesting questions. I'll have to read over it a second time before I'm able to fully digest it. Regards, Jacob Cook <jacob@peakwinter.net
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Decentralization and antifragility 2014-01-14 09:35:05
into arkOS, which would be a great companion for upcoming XMPP server support. I read over your blog post as well, it raises some interesting questions. I'll have to read over it a second time before I'm able to fully digest it. Regards, Jacob Cook < jacob@peakwinter.net
Thomas Levine [GG] Distributed Dance Party update 2018-06-18 23:34:00
series and YOU are invited to attend or   present.   HOWEVER!   This is your last chance to submit interest to speak and have it published   in the main BM schedule. CLICK THIS GOOGLE DOC LINK and fill out your info   ASAP
frabcus [GG] Re: Which decentralized products do you use day to day? 2016-07-25 12:23:00
Thanks all for ideas, much appreciated!    Happy Day, out of interest what do you use IPFS
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Blog lisbon? 2014-08-06 10:05:20
github.com/redecentralize/redecentralize-website/tree/gh-pages/_posts/blog that'd be very useful. And details of the next meetup would be great on the wiki too. I'm particularly interested if you'd be willing to do more coverage of remotestorage :) Ross > On 6 Aug 2014, at 08:33, Pierre Ozoux <pierre.ozoux@gmail.com> wrote
Geoffroy Couprie [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 19:33:08
more design and user experience people in decentralization projects. As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement. We are going
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 13:21:29
more design and user experience people in decentralization projects. As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement. We are going
Anish Mangal [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 22:29:01
Christian, Go right ahead! :) Yes, in the village case (#2), they are more interested in connecting their village (i.e. residents with one another) locally and to other neighbouring villages through wifi and directional antennas. Internet is secondary. Also should make it clear at this point that this
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Check out Hiveware's decentralized platform (as in no servers) 2015-09-02 13:06:32
narrative must convey the idea that economics should be pushed back to its original application of serving human communities, not special interests. "Redecentralization" is about empowering our communities, not shifting from global masters to other global masters. That is the process of revolution: using the masses to help
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-03 09:53:54
code using a proof of validity stored in the Namecoin blockchain. And in the future, delivering code updates via the Avatar network itself. Really interested to see how this works out. Any opinions? [1] http://avatar.ai [2] http://sneakpeek.avatar.ai/technology.html [3] http://www.matasano.com/articles/javascript-cryptography/ Regards Martin
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] february meetup 2014-02-03 10:52:25
start putting out feelers in the Austin area. Should we put together a meetup resource for redecentralize? I think people would respond with more interest if they knew the .org was behind it. We have the Distributed Systems Enthusiasts (on meetup.com ) for a near approximation in the mean-time
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-03 11:04:28
code using a proof of validity stored in the Namecoin blockchain. And in the future, delivering code updates via the Avatar network itself. Really interested to see how this works out. Any opinions? [1] http://avatar.ai [2] http://sneakpeek.avatar.ai/technology.html [3] http://www.matasano.com/articles/javascript-cryptography/ Regards Martin
Ximin Luo [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 11:50:48
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-28 10:00:04
more design and user experience people in decentralization projects. As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement. We are going
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-03-03 14:29:51
user.  No matter how much crypto you add, a chance is left where you must trust your admin.  So the first "interesting" result: an incorruptible system has pair-wise symmetric permissions initially. (Independent of how permissions are represented)  Next: we know there are inalienable rights in real
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Europython talk on P2P & Politics 2014-07-28 08:53:49
SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dave, Heh... no nerves scraped, but I did want to address your complaint about complaining and, tbh, it's interesting and fun to engage with people who are critical. Best wishes, Nicholas. On 28/07/14 07:49, David Burns wrote: > Apparently I scraped a nerve
Robert Tischer [LibreList] RE: [redecentralize] Check out Hiveware's decentralized platform (as in no servers) 2015-09-02 13:49:55
narrative must convey the idea that economics should be pushed back to its original application of serving human communities, not special interests. "Redecentralization" is about empowering our communities, not shifting from global masters to other global masters. That is the process of revolution: using the masses to help
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Applying User-Agent Behaviors in Web Applications to Enable Runtime Extension 2014-03-09 10:40:18
architecture which supports social extension of web applications in > order to provide autonomy from hosting organizations. That "autonomy" piece caught my interest. After all, it's what askemos.org is about. > If anybody has questions on the approach, feel free to ask; I'll post
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Check out Hiveware's decentralized platform (as in no servers) 2015-09-02 15:33:14
most email software understand. > Do you feel then that not-physical property is an oxymoron? > What I feel about it is seldom interesting to this discussion. However I can tell you that private property in general does not make much sense to me. > may I please
Robert Tischer [LibreList] RE: [redecentralize] Check out Hiveware's decentralized platform (as in no servers) 2015-09-02 16:36:16
most email software understand. > Do you feel then that not-physical property is an oxymoron? > What I feel about it is seldom interesting to this discussion. However I can tell you that private property in general does not make much sense to me. > may I please
christoph [GG] Re: Decentralized Web (SF) and Matrix Channel 2016-05-31 01:35:00
last person to learn about it. Maybe we need a central calendar for that ;) That's also something a couple Matrix channels might be interesting for. The chatter is low traffic enough to not be too spammy
Dominic Tarr [LibreList] squatconf 2014-10-19 23:59:27
hello redecentralizers If you happen to be handy to Paris in mid-december, then you may be interested in attending squatconf, or speaking there! It's an anarchist tech conf. It's free and there are no sponsors. you can make a donation if you like. Naturally
Ross Jones [LibreList] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-10 08:45:15
more easily sharable list of the ideas made at the last London meetup. It’d be great if whoever has an interest in any of them just picked them up and ran with them, although I believe Nick may have claimed the organising of a conference
Francis Irving [LibreList] DataCoin 2013-12-25 00:29:40
chains. http://datacoin.info/index.php?id=faq I'm not sure of the value above a distributed filestore more like Drogulus. And yet, it seems at least interesting to be aware of. Francis
Benjamin Heitmann [LibreList] GNU Internet Stack / youbroketheinternet.org 2013-12-29 18:08:24
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Intros and current projects 2013-12-29 15:11:48
know each other. I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project called Grimwire that's in this realm. I'm also involved
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Secure Bitcoin wallet backups 2014-01-05 19:48:11
Just watched the interesting interview with Daniel Silverstone [1]. There was the idea of having secure Bitcoin wallet backups by doing N-of-M secret-sharing. I would like to add that the Bitcoin Armory client already seems to be able to something similar. See "Using Fragmented Backups
Ira [LibreList] Un|commons 2015-09-02 12:58:35
Just came across this event in Berlin 22nd-24th October that sounds interesting:  http://berlinergazette.de/uncommons/ "WATER AND FOOD, DATA AND NETWORKS, MEDICINE AND CULTURAL ASSETS: WHO OWNS THESE RESOURCES? WHO OUGHT
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-02 17:46:44
code using a proof of validity stored in the Namecoin blockchain. And in the future, delivering code updates via the Avatar network itself. Really interested to see how this works out. Any opinions? [1] http://avatar.ai [2] http://sneakpeek.avatar.ai/technology.html [3] http://www.matasano.com/articles/javascript-cryptography/ Regards Martin
Odinn Cyberguerrilla [LibreList] A Redecentralization Special - Cryptocurrencies for Good: Revolutionizing Microdonations 2014-02-13 11:36:21
Good: Revolutionizing Microdonations' as an indiegogo project. This currently involves myself, Filipe Farinha, and technical support from Cryptostorm. And just in case you are interested, there is wine. Here's our page, launched today: http://igg.me/at/microdonations-using-cryptocurrencies As the world changes, so must
Francis Irving [LibreList] Spring of User Experience 2014-02-27 20:20:26
more design and user experience people in decentralization projects. As I describe in the Gigaom article today, I also think designers are quite interested in this (post Snowden), and likely there are some who need good projects to help/start but don't know about this movement. We are going
Nina Bianchi [LibreList] Internet blackout simulation workshop @ Eyebeam 2014-03-21 11:07:46
might be interested in checking this out in April  http://eyebeam.org/events/eyebeam-square-an-internet-blackout-simulation-event   Eyebeam (if you aren't already familiar) is a great space / org. With everything going on in Turkey, the timing is right. I'll be helping a bit at the event. Lots of mesh folks (through
Jacob Cook [LibreList] Wanted: arkOS Volunteer Associate Program Director 2014-03-26 14:33:41
Toronto, Ottawa or New York City, check it out: https://citizenweb.is/news/2014/03/assistant-program-director/ Please share far and wide if you know someone who might be interested. Thanks! -- Jacob Cook <jacob@peakwinter.net> https://peakwinter.net
Stephan Tual [LibreList] London panelist? 2014-04-25 14:50:43
innovative new products on a censorship and collusion-resistant foundation." Potential use cases at  https://medium.com/p/4790bf5f7743 Recently our CTO wrote this very interesting article on a potential 'web 3.0', a decentralized web: http://insightsintoamodernworld.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/apps-what-web-30-looks-like.html  This gives us a 'holy trinity' of decentralized logic, decentralized storage and decentralize
Ross Jones [LibreList] Help/volunteer request - Interviewees for social ramifications of online privacy 2014-05-15 08:31:47
interview (via whichever medium you’d like). I’m not sure it’ll fix anything, but I for one am interested in how the issues are seen from a psychologist’s point of view. If anyone’s got the time and could mail
Ross Jones [LibreList] Tracking interesting events/confs? 2014-05-15 08:36:30
managed to miss the boat on DecentralizeCamp ( http://decentralizecamp.com/ ), I was wondering if tracking interesting events/conferences would be a useful thing for redecentralize.org to do? We started on the Wiki to try and list groups that were either in progress, or being born, but didn’t get very
David Geib [LibreList] snow: a new distributed secure virtual network 2014-07-04 13:59:15
released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow
Thomas Waldmann [LibreList] yet another pythonista 2014-08-01 21:06:30
MoinMoin! First post - I am Thomas and interested in redecentralizing the internet, improving software security, exploring new crypto and privacy enhancing software. Personally, I work on Python stuff usually, like MoinMoin Wiki, nsupdate.info dyndns service / software, bepasty generalized pastebin software. Cheers, Thomas ---- GPG ID: FAF7B393 GPG FP: 6D5B EF9A DD20
Ross Jones [LibreList] The D14N project 2014-08-05 13:33:32
feet (who isn’t), I’ve mailed to see if there’s a way we can avoid missing out on interesting threads and make sure we don’t duplicate any effort. In the meantime, if you’ve got space for one more mailing-list
Bastien Guerry [LibreList] « Reclaiming the Internet » with distributed architectures: rights, technologies, practices, innovation 2014-08-13 19:24:38
just wanted to draw your attention to this symposium, which is of particular interest to this list: http://adam.hypotheses.org/1939 I'm cc'ing Samer, good friend of mine, and a re-decentralize guy too. Best, -- Bastien
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Zooko's triangle vs. Gödel incompleteness the 2014-08-21 12:22:09
problem for someone better at math than me. Though the result should be tremendous interesting to many people and projects on this list. The challenge: Show how precisely the challenge seen in Zooko's triangle is different from precondition of Gödel's incompleteness theorem. Alternative: Show that there
Andrew Manning [LibreList] Video interview request: Red Matrix 2014-11-29 14:53:03
that are difficult to explain in two sentences or a thirty second sound bite, and I think people would find an interview with very interesting! Andrew
Danny Knestaut [LibreList] Hello! 2013-12-08 18:21:21
cancelled my Google account and have replaced almost all of the Google services I used with self-hosted solutions that I control. I'm interested in learning about the various alternatives to centralization, and I'm happy to share what little knowledge and experience I've gleaned in trying
Goffi [LibreList] Hello + Salut à Toi / Libervia 2015-08-22 18:15:14
often do talks in France or around. Unfortunately we can't come for the conference planed in London. Hope to get some interest here Cheers Goffi
Ira [LibreList] Redecentralize Conference! 2015-08-05 07:39:39
decided to organise a redecentralize conference THIS YEAR! Currently thinking October time. It will be a place to bring interested people together, showcase what’s been happening with various projects, discover new ones and understand the evolving conversation about the possibilities and concerns of decentralization. My hope
Adrien [LibreList] to explain decentralisation with a simple card game 2015-09-07 20:05:29
fake card game - I say fake because the results can be known in advance -, very simple but hopefully effective enough to catch the interest, to explain a bit and eventually to allow a deeper conversation with the participants. The "game" is described here: http://diekulturvermittlung.at/2015/09/decentralise-the-game/?lang=en I would
Ira [LibreList] Feminist hackers + conference 2015-09-08 08:56:33
Dear women on this mailing list, Are you here? Say hello! :-) Everyone else: invite a woman or two to join! Also, you might be interested in writing something for:  http://recompilermag.com/2015/09/01/call-for-contributors-issue-2/  it's a feminist hacker online magazine and their next issue is on privacy