hash over the object's content. This proof should hold even if the
> secret key was lost or published.
>
The drogulus uses
public key cryptography (RSA) for signing digital
assets.
>>
>> An item stored in the DHT is a collection of named fields
/...\ creator for the key. * created_with
>> - the version of the drogulus the creator used to generate the
>> item. *
public_key - the creator's
public key. * key - the
>> SHA-512 value of the compound key (based upon the
public_key and
>> name fields
/...\ assert provenance: creator, witness, time etc. and
> hash these together with the hash of the actual value.
>
So the creator (via their
public key) and time of creation are all
constituent in creating the hash.
> Now if you take this hash as canonical identifier for the object
given by the creator for the key.
> * created_with - the version of the drogulus the creator used to
> generate the item.
> *
public_key - the creator's
public key.
> * key - the SHA-512 value of the compound key (based upon the
public_key
> and name fields
/...\ correct to understand that the "key" field serves this
purpose?
I'm a bit concerned about the inclusion of some
public_key here. This
identifier should IMHO only cover non-repudiable,
public (or
semi-
public) meta data. No private data an nothing one would ever want
to change
/...\ public_key field is used to validate the signature value. If this is
> OK then the compound SHA-512 key is checked using the obviously valid
>
public_key and name fields.
>
> This ensures both the provenance of the data and that it hasn't been
list of the intangible
cultural heritage of UNESCO.
http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/en/RL/idea-and-practice-of-organizing-shared-interests-in-cooperatives-01200
)
In the beginning television in Germany was organised under
public law,
controlled by a board which consist of members from "relevant social
groups". Television in that time had a
public mission. With the advent
of private television this system
/...\ niche and people
started to degenerate.
What I want to say is. There are means to control infrastructure
a. collectively
b. by a
public board
so that the infrastructure is neither controlled by the state nor by
corporations.
Especially b. was and is criticized in Germany by special interest
groups
/...\ that want to privatize the entire
public sector. Their success is
undeniable. Germany today is nearly completely private property.
I think that this is the front line. We have to fight back private
interest in the net. And because this is contrary to the individualised
ethos of most western developers
meaningful name given by the creator for the key.
* created_with - the version of the drogulus the creator used to
generate the item.
*
public_key - the creator's
public key.
* key - the SHA-512 value of the compound key (based upon the
public_key
and name fields) used
/...\ actual key on the distributed hash table.
* signature - a cryptographic signature generated using the creator's
private key with the fields described above.
The
public_key field is used to validate the signature value. If this is
OK then the compound SHA-512 key is checked using the obviously valid
/...\ public_key and name fields.
This ensures both the provenance of the data and that it hasn't been
tampered with. Any items that don't pass the cryptographic checks are
ignored and nodes that propagate them are punished by being blocked. It
also confirms that the generated
anonymous | known<br>
--------------------------------------------------------<br>
public | O | O<br>
--------------------------------------------------------<br>
private
/...\ analogy would be the difference between your house and the
public square. And talking to many or one person. <br>
<br>
Corporations want everything to act like one system because they
need control. This is obviously stupid. <br>
<br>
<a href
/...\ falls on the private/known
mode of communication, and I am not attempting to make it anything
else. ZeroTier One can act as
public or private and it makes
sense to me why he chose some central points to handle the
public
case. Because to handle the
public case
indeed a unique identifier for the item.
Great!
>> I'm a bit concerned about the inclusion of some
public_key here.
>> This identifier should IMHO only cover non-repudiable,
public (or
>> semi-
public) meta data. No private data an nothing one would ever
/...\ want to change.
>>
> I'm not sure I understand you completely. The
public key is required
> in order for third parties to validate the signature (created with the
> associated private key).
May I ask: why does it have to be that way?
Experience teaches that
distribution problem, which is an authentication problem. You have some name or other identity and you need a trustworthy method of obtaining the corresponding
public key.
The second problem is the communication problem, which is a reliability/availability problem. You have some
public key and you want to make a [more
/...\ distribution has the narrower solution. If you're The New York Times or CBS then you can e.g. print the QR code of your
public key fingerprint on the back page of every issue. A reader who picks up an issue from a random news stand can have good confidence
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 13:18:13 WebRTC system, and I've basically made the same tradeoffs. You need a central coordinator for WebRTC's signalling, so I'm running a
public one, and then the server can be downloaded and self-administered for the super hard-core. I agree physical decentralization isn't important enough
/...\ both an open source / free component and a commercial component. ZeroTier One supports the creation of arbitrary distributed LANs. There will be a few
public wide-open ones that will be free for unlimited use, but you can also create private distributed LANs. I plan to charge users to create
/...\ wouldn't go anywhere.
This is why one of my goals with this project is to make p2p lateral communication easy on
public virtual LANs. The fact that peers use a set of centralized servers to find each other is IMHO secondary... making lateral communication easy enables people to easily
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 13:53:30 WebRTC system, and I've basically made the same tradeoffs. You need a central coordinator for WebRTC's signalling, so I'm running a
public one, and then the server can be downloaded and self-administered for the super hard-core. I agree physical decentralization isn't important enough
/...\ both an open source / free component and a commercial component. ZeroTier One supports the creation of arbitrary distributed LANs. There will be a few
public wide-open ones that will be free for unlimited use, but you can also create private distributed LANs. I plan to charge users to create
/...\ wouldn't go anywhere.
This is why one of my goals with this project is to make p2p lateral communication easy on
public virtual LANs. The fact that peers use a set of centralized servers to find each other is IMHO secondary... making lateral communication easy enables people to easily
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 11:40:41 WebRTC system, and I've basically made the same tradeoffs. You need a central coordinator for WebRTC's signalling, so I'm running a
public one, and then the server can be downloaded and self-administered for the super hard-core. I agree physical decentralization isn't important enough
/...\ both an open source / free component and a commercial component. ZeroTier One supports the creation of arbitrary distributed LANs. There will be a few
public wide-open ones that will be free for unlimited use, but you can also create private distributed LANs. I plan to charge users to create
/...\ wouldn't go anywhere.
This is why one of my goals with this project is to make p2p lateral communication easy on
public virtual LANs. The fact that peers use a set of centralized servers to find each other is IMHO secondary... making lateral communication easy enables people to easily
knowledge and culture, on par
with scientific knowledge.
The arts show that you can pay for a work and make it available to the
public without further fee. Artists paid for their work don't complain that
they don't get a fee for each visitor. Second-hand bookstore
/...\ illegal.
Public libraries either.
"Intellectual property" is a confusing legal construct that covers anything
from authorship rights to patent laws. It would be akin to say that a
fence, a kitchen, and a book belong to the same "physical property".
RT2>I guess I forgot
/...\ that is enforced. That material-possession-like trait is the
kind of ownership Hiveware wishes to contribute to. Furthermore, my
technology is already
public. Anyone can get instructions on how to write a
cooperative engine like Hiveware if they wish. It's all online.
RT2>
I understand perfectly
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 13:46:47 WebRTC system, and I've basically made the same tradeoffs. You need a central coordinator for WebRTC's signalling, so I'm running a
public one, and then the server can be downloaded and self-administered for the super hard-core. I agree physical decentralization isn't important enough
/...\ both an open source / free component and a commercial component. ZeroTier One supports the creation of arbitrary distributed LANs. There will be a few
public wide-open ones that will be free for unlimited use, but you can also create private distributed LANs. I plan to charge users to create
/...\ wouldn't go anywhere.
This is why one of my goals with this project is to make p2p lateral communication easy on
public virtual LANs. The fact that peers use a set of centralized servers to find each other is IMHO secondary... making lateral communication easy enables people to easily
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 11:50:49 WebRTC system, and I've basically made the same tradeoffs. You need a central coordinator for WebRTC's signalling, so I'm running a
public one, and then the server can be downloaded and self-administered for the super hard-core. I agree physical decentralization isn't important enough
/...\ both an open source / free component and a commercial component. ZeroTier One supports the creation of arbitrary distributed LANs. There will be a few
public wide-open ones that will be free for unlimited use, but you can also create private distributed LANs. I plan to charge users to create
/...\ wouldn't go anywhere.
This is why one of my goals with this project is to make p2p lateral communication easy on
public virtual LANs. The fact that peers use a set of centralized servers to find each other is IMHO secondary... making lateral communication easy enables people to easily
place.
Message&message is another interesting topic. We have two:
http://askemos.org/index.html?_v=search&_id=1302
> The id is just the hash
> of the
public key used to sign the messages in a feed. A feed may not
> be signed by mutliple keys
/...\ ball.askemos.org/A876f1fe6998ca9d43f2e66c11a3f0d4a
>>> that is, this is one wallet of it. You want to log in using "
public" to
>>> find the actual thing. It's controlled by a single (though having
>>> 80kLOC large) source file:
>>> http://ball.askemos.org
project.
cheers, Benjamin.
--
Benjamin Heitmann, BSc, MSc
PhD Researcher
Unit for Information Mining and Retrieval (UIMR)
Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
NUI Galway, Ireland
publications and slides:
http://www.deri.ie/about/team/member/benjamin_heitmann/
http://www.slideshare.net/metaman/
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin_Heitmann/
public PGP key available at: http://keys.gnupg.net/
-- konklone.com | @konklone
Researcher
> Unit for Information Mining and Retrieval (UIMR)
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
> NUI Galway, Ireland
>
> publications and slides:
> http://www.deri.ie/about/team/member/benjamin_heitmann/
> http://www.slideshare.net/metaman/
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin_Heitmann/
>
> public PGP key available at: http://keys.gnupg.net/
>
- --
Do *you* have
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 10:51:29 both an open source / free component and a commercial component. ZeroTier One supports the creation of arbitrary distributed LANs. There will be a few
public wide-open ones that will be free for unlimited use, but you can also create private distributed LANs. I plan to charge users to create
/...\ wouldn't go anywhere. This is why one of my goals with this project is to make p2p lateral communication easy on
public virtual LANs. The fact that peers use a set of centralized servers to find each other is IMHO secondary... making lateral communication easy enables people to easily
friends). (And yes: it delivers it's own website from
those SoCs.)
Downsides: the fuse client is not stable enough to be released
publicly
and WebDAV is no longer widely supported on client sides. While the
whole thing should itself be able to run on Android, nobody had the
resources
/...\ volunteered to help.
>>
>> One
> of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news
>
publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are
> censorship proof, that remove bias from journalism and allows more
> accurate
same as Tox's is the same as many humans -- personal defensiveness. I'm not sure how to solve that, but working in
public  and operating openly  are great starts.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
/...\ inviting getting academic researchers, students, lawyers
etc. to provide reviews, applications and their legal opinion (in
addition to the peer-review of the original
publication) we hoped to
foster confidence that we did not miss anything important. But
still that's the normal course of affairs in science
Benjamin Heitmann [LibreList] GNU Internet Stack / youbroketheinternet.org 2013-12-29 18:08:24
knowledge
and culture, on par with scientific knowledge.
The arts show that you can pay for a work and make it available to the
public without further fee. Artists paid for their work don't complain
that they don't get a fee for each visitor. Second-hand bookstore
/...\ illegal.
Public libraries either.
"Intellectual property" is a confusing legal construct that covers
anything from authorship rights to patent laws. It would be akin to say
that a fence, a kitchen, and a book belong to the same "physical
property".
> my way of thinking
Researcher
> Unit for Information Mining and Retrieval (UIMR)
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
> NUI Galway, Ireland
>
> publications and slides:
> http://www.deri.ie/about/team/member/benjamin_heitmann/
> http://www.slideshare.net/metaman/
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin_Heitmann/
>
> public PGP key available at: http://keys.gnupg.net/
>
- --
Do *you* have
estimate the resources it takes
All typos are shallow in the mailing list! :)
And still: we underestimated how much resources we would need for
publicity and evangelism. (The single worst mistake we made.)
Could've saved myself a year if I understood that
/...\ bachelor and master papers and a handful of grants from govt.
programs.
And still: we underestimated how much resources we would need for
publicity and evangelism. (The single worst mistake we made.)
and you can't waste time when you're 1) downstream of a
platform that could
Mining and Retrieval (UIMR)
> > > Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
> > > NUI Galway, Ireland
> > >
> > >
publications and slides:
> > > http://www.deri.ie/about/team/member/benjamin_heitmann/
> > > http://www.slideshare.net/metaman/
> > > https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin_Heitmann/
/...\ public PGP key available at: http://keys.gnupg.net/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > - --
> > Do *you* have an awesome idea you never quite manage to do?
> > http://www.awesomefoundation.org/en/chapters/liverpool/
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin
Mining and Retrieval (UIMR)
> > > Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
> > > NUI Galway, Ireland
> > >
> > >
publications and slides:
> > > http://www.deri.ie/about/team/member/benjamin_heitmann/
> > > http://www.slideshare.net/metaman/
> > > https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin_Heitmann/
/...\ public PGP key available at: http://keys.gnupg.net/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > - --
> > Do *you* have an awesome idea you never quite manage to do?
> > http://www.awesomefoundation.org/en/chapters/liverpool/
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin
feed is an append-only singly linked list of messages, owned by an
id. The id is just the hash
of the
public key used to sign the messages in a feed. A feed may not
be signed by mutliple keys
and the key may not be reassigned. The idea
/...\ here
>> http://ball.askemos.org/A876f1fe6998ca9d43f2e66c11a3f0d4a
>> that is, this is one wallet of it. You want to log in using "
public" to
>> find the actual thing. It's controlled by a single (though having
>> 80kLOC large) source file:
>> http://ball.askemos.org
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] FireChat in Economist 2014-06-04 10:32:38 still be
silently backdoored in some ways -- you
can't generally verify that the server
is running the same code that's in
public source control.
This BTW is only correct as far as it pertains
to the secrecy of the information handled by the
software. Though even unmodified
more? How do you steer the evolution of such a system?
All of these questions are easier to answer for infrastructure than
for public-facing products and services. Facebook, Google and Twitter
sit on top of several layers of mostly-decentralised infrastructure.
Since you're building infrastructure, I wonder whether
answer for what functionality is required.
Imagine a stupid-simple key-value store with PUT and GET. Each key has a corresponding public key submitted with it that can be used to authorize future updates of the same key. Keys expire after one year. That's it.
Or could
answer for what functionality is required.
>
> Imagine a stupid-simple key-value store with PUT and GET. Each key has a corresponding public key submitted with it that can be used to authorize future updates of the same key. Keys expire after one year. That
build *completely* center-less networks with the same performance, efficiency, and security characteristics as centralized ones would rank up there with the discovery of public key cryptography. It'd be Nobel Prize material if there were a Nobel Prize for CS.
Fortunately, your actual approach, the peer-(super) peer-peer
great until some entity amasses enough computing power to vote itself God. And you can do similar with other scarce or expensive things. IPv4 public addresses come to mind. Useful for banning trolls on IRC but if your attacker has a Class A or a botnet you're screwed
Thanks again, Microsoft. Though I think the OpenVPN users might have beat you to the equivalent solution, e.g. http://superuser.com/questions/120038/changing-network-type-from-unidentified-network-to-private-network-on-an-openvpn
(And as a public service announcement, 1.1.1.1 is no longer a "fake" address as the 1.0.0.0/8 block was assigned to APNIC. http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xhtml
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1:30 AM, David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: It
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-17 01:17:28 that is the reason I volunteered to help.
One
of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news
publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are
censorship proof, that remove bias from journalism and allows more
accurate and transparent dissemination
when you follow someone, you'd post a
message saying "i followed $DavidGeib" (where "$DavidGeib" is the hash
of your public key) and probably also include in this message a hint
about where you can find the node with that key (an ip:port
current draft) for instance is here
http://ball.askemos.org/A876f1fe6998ca9d43f2e66c11a3f0d4a
that is, this is one wallet of it. You want to log in using "public" to
find the actual thing. It's controlled by a single (though having
80kLOC large) source file:
http://ball.askemos.org/Aa176138e655369f8c01c3044ced70cfc
(be sure to read
think a simple registry in an Askemos
compatible system would do. Users would choose one or more
registries and publish their peer's public key and status. Plus
some one-time code (TAN) to set the status to "compromised" when
they lost control of their device.
Otherwise
instance is here
> http://ball.askemos.org/A876f1fe6998ca9d43f2e66c11a3f0d4a
> that is, this is one wallet of it. You want to log in using "public" to
> find the actual thing. It's controlled by a single (though having
> 80kLOC large) source file:
> http://ball.askemos.org/Aa176138e655369f8c01c3044ced70cfc
work with
> communities which are rural, often remote, and largely disconnected to
> the internet. At these places, access to CC-licensed or public domain
> content is provided to children (sometimes specifically in schools) and
> the larger community through village-spanning wifi networks (for an
> example
work with
> communities which are rural, often remote, and largely disconnected to
> the internet. At these places, access to CC-licensed or public domain
> content is provided to children (sometimes specifically in schools) and
> the larger community through village-spanning wifi networks (for an
> example
communities which are rural, often remote, and largely disconnected to
> > the internet. At these places, access to CC-licensed or public domain
> > content is provided to children (sometimes specifically in
> schools) and
> > the larger community through village-spanning wifi networks
Benjamin Heitmann (MSc, PhD), Post-Doctoral Researcher INSIGHT Centre for Data Analytics National University of Ireland, Galway publications and slides: https://www.resear
chgate.net/profile/Benjamin_Heitmann http://www.slideshare.net/metaman/ -- This week's top digital retail stories http://www.theretailpractice.com/retail-bytes/
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-16 13:38:46 that is the reason I volunteered to help. One
of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news
publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are
censorship proof, that remove bias from journalism and allows more
accurate and transparent dissemination
Adrien [GG] Re: So centralized! 2016-04-07 09:07:00 offered it already ;)
For the mailing list, as he said Framapad is serious but for now their
service "framalistes" is not open to the public. Anyway, if the members
of this list are ready to switch to a mailing list which is not hosted
by Google, we can find
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-08 18:36:58 know WebTorrent will be doing something a bit different, but there might be some good lessons from it to use when building the public face of WebTorrent.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Feross Aboukhadijeh < feross@feross.org > wrote:
Hey everyone! I think Redecentralize is awesome
Paul Frazee [GG] Re: Zeronet and Twister anyone 2016-04-07 10:23:00 against using them that way. https://zeronet.readthedocs.org/en/latest/faq/#can-i-use-the-generated-site-addressprivate-key-to-accept-bitcoin-payments The sites are static-files hosted with bit-torrent. The sites are addressed by public keys, which are used to sign content manifests for the site. https://zeronet.readthedocs.org/en/latest/faq/#how-does-it-work Pretty simple to publish, you just create a directory, sign
Feross Aboukhadijeh [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-08 15:46:06 know WebTorrent will be doing something a bit different, but there might be some good lessons from it to use when building the public face of WebTorrent.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Feross Aboukhadijeh < feross@feross.org > wrote:
Hey everyone! I think Redecentralize is awesome
maybe just easier to script against.
Using a blockchain model for electronic voting seems very interesting, it's a shame that it hasn't publicly advanced beyond iamsatoshi's rough blog post  and Agora's private draft . That's something to watch for in 2014, I think.
-- Eric
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Spring of User Experience 2014-03-03 16:07:34 inviting getting academic researchers, students, lawyers
etc. to provide reviews, applications and their legal opinion (in
addition to the peer-review of the original publication) we hoped to
foster confidence that we did not miss anything important. But
still that's the normal course of affairs in science
maybe just easier to script against.
Using a blockchain model for electronic voting seems very interesting, it's a shame that it hasn't publicly advanced beyond iamsatoshi's rough blog post  and Agora's private draft . That's something to watch for in 2014, I think.
-- Eric
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] FireChat in Economist 2014-06-02 11:34:27 still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't generally verify that the server is running the same code that's in public source control.
But all the intentions, architecture, security, community engagement, good faith participation, etc. of the project are all obscured by closing the source. They exist
bachelor and master papers and a handful of grants from govt.
programs.
And still: we underestimated how much resources we would need for
publicity and evangelism. (The single worst mistake we made.)
and you can't waste time when you're 1) downstream of a
platform that could
there an ETA on that package?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote:
ZeroTier One public beta binary release is now available for Macintosh and Linux. (Windows coming soon.) Tell me how broken it is, or isn't.
https://www.zerotier.com/download.html
there an ETA on that package?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote:
ZeroTier One public beta binary release is now available for Macintosh and Linux. (Windows coming soon.) Tell me how broken it is, or isn't.
https://www.zerotier.com/download.html
there an ETA on that package?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote:
ZeroTier One public beta binary release is now available for Macintosh and Linux. (Windows coming soon.) Tell me how broken it is, or isn't.
https://www.zerotier.com/download.html
encrypted,
still creatively owns his digital item where 'B' owns a legal copy of same.
This is the conversation currently taking place between the public and the
government's security agencies who want de-encryption backdoors always
available. Once this debate resolves on encryptions side, the debate will
naturally become
holger krekel [LibreList] any meeting point for tonight? 2015-10-16 08:18:38 reason I volunteered to help.
>
> One of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are censorship proof, that remove bias from journalism and allows more accurate and transparent dissemination of information
zero-knowledge system hosted by many providers. Â (If the servers are independent and don't communicate, we could have one server that publicly lists the IPs of the other servers.) Â This is basically the Fluidinfo scenario, but hosted my multiple parties.
Would either of these
reason I volunteered to help.
Â
One
of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news
publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are
censorship proof, that remove bias from journalism and allows more
accurate and transparent dissemination of information
ZeroTier One public beta binary release is now available for Macintosh and Linux. (Windows coming soon.) Tell me how broken it is, or isn't.
https://www.zerotier.com/download.html
that is the reason I volunteered to help.
One
of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news
publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are
censorship proof, that remove bias from journalism and allows more
accurate and transparent dissemination
Jos Poortvliet [LibreList] connecting 2015-09-16 19:14:02
largely work with communities which are rural, often remote, and largely disconnected to the internet. At these places, access to CC-licensed or public domain content is provided to children (sometimes specifically in schools) and the larger community through village-spanning wifi networks (for an example, see [2][3]). Many
will.sch [LibreList] RDC 15 2015-10-15 13:25:28 that is the reason I volunteered to help. One
of my main interests is looking at ways in which we can create news
publications that are controlled and edited by it's readers, that are
censorship proof, that remove bias from journalism and allows more
accurate and transparent dissemination
talk about ? -- Benjamin Heitmann (MSc, PhD), Post-Doctoral Researcher INSIGHT Centre for Data Analytics National University of Ireland, Galway publications and slides: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin_Heitmann http://www.slideshare.net/metaman/
Pierre Ozoux [GG] Public Money until tomorrow evening: 2016-04-09 10:38:00 know more, you can
follow this
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/
If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to ask.
You can verify my public key here: https://keybase.io/pierreozoux
Jon Spriggs [GG] OggCamp 2017-03-07 14:36:00 university, Canterbury. There is a single scheduled track and two barcamp style tracks, as well as somewhere for organisations such as Fedora, Ubuntu, Hacker Public Radio, and ... possibly Redecentralize? to explain to people what they do, why they're there and how to get involved. If you're interested, please
features requested by focus group
testers: a wider choice of notification sounds, and showing which
contacts subscribe to a forum.
Medium term: Public beta testing of our Android app, starting work on
the desktop UI.
Long term: Use Briar's data synchronization capabilities to support
secure, distributed applications including blogging
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] FireChat in Economist 2014-06-03 08:29:42 still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't
generally verify that the server is running the same code
that's in public source control.
This BTW is only correct as far as it pertains to the secrecy of the
information handled by the software. Though even unmodified
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] FireChat in Economist 2014-06-03 10:35:02 still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't
generally verify that the server is running the same code
that's in public source control.
This BTW is only correct as far as it pertains to the secrecy of the
information handled by the software. Though even
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] FireChat in Economist 2014-06-03 10:17:33 still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't
generally verify that the server is running the same code
that's in public source control.
This BTW is only correct as far as it pertains to the secrecy of the
information handled by the software. Though even