Redecentralize

quote email and that you don't edit replies makes it quite difficult to follow. The "> " prefix is something most email software understand. > Do you feel then that not-physical property is an oxymoron? > What I feel about it is seldom interesting to this discussion /...\ others. > Well, it's non-modifiable and non-distributable, so it's proprietary, by definition. There are quite a number of free software projects that don't allow any modification that they don't like. But they still allow people to propose such modifications, and fork the project /...\ they like. The Linux kernel is such a project. The "current P2P diaspora" depends on free software, because without access to the source code, you can't ensure that the software actually does what it claims to do. It's really not about property. > I pay them

quote email and that you don't edit replies makes it quite difficult to follow. The "> " prefix is something most email software understand. > Do you feel then that not-physical property is an oxymoron? > What I feel about it is seldom interesting to this discussion /...\ others. > Well, it's non-modifiable and non-distributable, so it's proprietary, by definition. There are quite a number of free software projects that don't allow any modification that they don't like. But they still allow people to propose such modifications, and fork the project /...\ they like. The Linux kernel is such a project. The "current P2P diaspora" depends on free software, because without access to the source code, you can't ensure that the software actually does what it claims to do. It's really not about property. > I pay them

just a different "machine" executing it: physical hardware or human agents.  But both are supposed to stick precisely to the rules until the software is changed.  (And both are usually buggy.) I was trying to compensate for my bias by using understatement and ambiguity /...\ gather experience.  The limits of the system are rather tight: it is essentially a system to collect/assert proofs of the state of software agents.  The agent's code however is treated like a contract: no change, no upgrade.  The system starts actually by creating a social contract /...\ typically operate by defining constraints that must not be violated, leaving agents free to pursue arbitrary goals using arbitrary strategies within those limits. Software typically provides a menu of capabilities, defined (usually) by a sequential, goal oriented algorithm, often employing a single prechosen strategy. Constraints limit

Even during wartime, as restricted as exchange between intellectuals might be, scientists know no borders, and build on each other's knowledge. The free software movement can be considered yet another contribution to human knowledge and culture, on par with scientific knowledge. The arts show that /...\ ruling class. This won't help us achieve global sustainability in any case. The power shift requires both global coordination and local autonomy. Only software freedom can achieve the latter. As to the former, only politics can do it. Technology alone, especially proprietary technologies, cannot provide the necessary empowerment /...\ competing with them in that area. In that sense I and these sub-vendors are cooperating, not collaborating, which is the Hiveware way without software interlocking controls (ie, just the barebones library keeps me from changing their code). In fact, I really don't want to know anything about

Even during wartime, as restricted as exchange between intellectuals might be, scientists know no borders, and build on each other's knowledge. The free software movement can be considered yet another contribution to human knowledge and culture, on par with scientific knowledge. The arts show that /...\ ruling class. This won't help us achieve global sustainability in any case. The power shift requires both global coordination and local autonomy. Only software freedom can achieve the latter. As to the former, only politics can do it. Technology alone, especially proprietary technologies, cannot provide the necessary empowerment /...\ There's no such thing as the philosophy of "open source", forced or not. Open source is a reduction of the free software philosophy to its engineering aspect, specifically designed to tame corporate fears about anything social. It succeeded in bringing free software to the mainstream

Just go to "google @ ZT1 earth" and enjoy. 3. Sustainability: the resources (earned via ads, see above) to invest into polishing the software and the experience, allowing it to build new services (GOTO 1) IOW I think there is more to decentralization than the network topology /...\ protocol. However I do agree with you, Adam, that NATs are making it even harder to grow sustained decentralized deployments of software and services. But we also need to consider monetization or economical sustainability, easy software distribution and well evolved forms of collective deployments of software. best, holger /...\ open and simple and straightforward. All those complicated, fragmented p2p monstrosities have their own peculiar APIs and very complex specifications. That means that software built upon them cannot interoperate easily with other software built upon others. IP and open standards like HTTP, JSON, XML, etc. are designed for heterogenous ecosystems

different "machine" executing it: physical hardware or human agents.  But both are supposed to stick precisely to the rules until the software is changed.  (And both are usually buggy.) I was trying to compensate for my bias by using understatement and ambiguity /...\ operate by defining constraints that must not be violated, leaving agents free to pursue arbitrary goals using arbitrary strategies within those limits. Software typically provides a menu of capabilities, defined (usually) by a sequential, goal oriented algorithm, often employing a single prechosen strategy /...\ Constraints limit software, but do not dominate the situation as in law.  I must obey the traffic laws while driving to work. The law knows nothing about my goal. I am in charge. If/when we all have self-driving cars, traffic laws

London workshop in March, gathering FLOSS projects that are building software for peer production and organization, with a focus on distributed platforms. Scholarships to attend are offered to grassroots communities. ** Context ** We know that the Internet was originally decentralized, with protocols and services built by hackers. However, with the arrival /...\ emergence of Internet-enabled collaborative communities building shared libre/ open resources. Commons-based Peer to Peer Production (CBPP) is rapidly growing: not just for software and encyclopedias, but also for information (OpenStreetMap, Wikihow), hardware (FabLabs, Open Source Ecology), accommodation (Couchsurfing) and currency (Bitcoin, Altcoins). In the last few years /...\ also need to re-decentralize the Internet. Many initiatives are being undertaken under this premise (e.g. Ethereum, Diaspora, OwnCloud, MediaGoblin, Sandstorm). These new software tools may also be useful to boost CBPP communities further. In this workshop, we will gather those working around the decentralized FLOSS that could help CBPP/P2P

tech? The free and almost free world that corporations push now is no help because people are not used to paying for software anymore, or services. Maybe the solution is to just charge for this stuff and fight the race to the bottom. Another idea I had is charge corporations /...\ cheap or attractive enough than the alternative. This is why I tell people I am not an Open Source developer, but a Free Software developer. I don't work for free. Max Adam Ierymenko wrote: Had one other thought I wanted to add about free economics: I have this intuition /...\ infrastructure for personal computing. The way Apple uses cloud is close to what we ought to be trying to build in the more free/open software community. Apple uses cloud exactly this way— as dumb storage and support for rich endpoint devices. They just don’t do the open

Tiki Suite is a selection of Free / Libre / Open Source Software (FLOSS) server, web, mobile and desktop apps with a concerted focus on greater interoperability, security and adaptability, which is aimed at small & medium-sized organizations. The Tiki Suite is especially suited to decentralized and knowledge-centric organizations /...\ /Tiki+Suite "How come all our systems don't work together?" is a common frustration. Most organizations use dozens or even hundreds of software applications, systems and online services. Interoperability between them is a constant struggle. Time is wasted moving data from system to system. Data & feature duplication /...\ handling the interoperability between the components. So your organization can maintain full control of all your data, with Free / Libre / Open Source software (FLOSS). You can self-host on premise or on rented servers. It can be customized to your needs and we urge you to contribute to this community

better. Once download. Following requests are handled locally. > 3. Sustainability: the resources (earned via ads, see above) to > invest into polishing the software and the experience, allowing it to > build new services (GOTO 1) Bingo! This kind of project can easily eat a lifetime. It can burn /...\ protocol. However I do agree with you, Adam, that NATs > are making it even harder to grow sustained decentralized deployments of > software and services. But we also need to consider monetization or > economical sustainability Can't agree more. > well evolved forms of collective deployments of software /...\ That's an oxymoron. Developers will never allow collective deployments of software to evolve. They rather reinvent the wheel for "not invented here", "not the favorite language" or outright ignorance delivering old wine in new skins

MoinMoin! First post - I am Thomas and interested in redecentralizing the internet, improving software security, exploring new crypto and privacy enhancing software. Personally, I work on Python stuff usually, like MoinMoin Wiki, nsupdate.info dyndns service / software, bepasty generalized pastebin software. Cheers, Thomas ---- GPG ID: FAF7B393 GPG FP: 6D5B EF9A DD20

google @ ZT1 earth" > and enjoy. > > 3. Sustainability: the resources (earned via ads, see above) to > invest into polishing the software and the experience, allowing it to > build new services (GOTO 1) > > IOW I think there is more to decentralization than the network /...\ protocol. However I do agree with you, Adam, that NATs > are making it even harder to grow sustained decentralized deployments of > software and services. But we also need to consider monetization or > economical sustainability, easy software distribution and well evolved > forms of collective deployments of software

quite surprised to read, in the first message I receive from the list, the sentence above. How is "redecentralization" compatible with proprietary software at all? "open read-only source" sounds like you're trying to get free work (as in gratis) from your users, without letting /...\ them contribute changes to your software. How is that decentralized? Instead of decentralizing the process, you're simply changing the actors in control of the process. "open read-only source" is just a fancy word for proprietary software, or am I mistaken? In the interview, I had understood /...\ that the project was about "open source" solutions. Now, open source is already free software without ethics, but from there to "open read-only source", there's as huge a gap as between vegan food and McDonald's. Am I on the wrong list? Regards

seeing similarities between code as in law and code as in computer programs, you might enjoy how this equivalence became the heart of a software architecture: http://askemos.org/index.html?_v=footnote&_id=1223 Goes all the way down to start from an analogy of a constitution... I'm thrilled to see this idea eventually /...\ level-- we need to start thinking about algorithms and their spaces of execution as social statements. In the information age, they are. The way software is structured and executed affects the form and function of the socioeconomic realm. On Apr 6, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com /...\ reliance on upstream decisions. Because there is no process model in the application layer, there is no opportunity to reconfigure individual components in the software. The scripts are merged into a single program.   By instead splitting Web applications into multiple programs using Web Workers, we can disentangle the hard

have a *lot* of uses. It opens up the potential for things like black box certificate authorities that could be distributed as open source software. The CA signs your key. With what? A key pair it generated internally that cannot *ever* be viewed by *anyone*. :) -Adam /...\ hybrid peer to peer protocol that creates virtual Ethernet networks (plural). ZeroTier is more like SDN for everyone, everywhere. (SDN is software defined networking, and refers to the creation of software defined virtual networks in data centers.) I've been following CJDNS for a while. I know it's being

annoncube.com for the fund, once till the KS is in the approval process and another once is approved that link the project to other software projects. The reason is a polciy from KS that say we can not use the funds for any software that we are not creators (funny /...\ these incredibly great ideas? My idea is to make a new social network that has at it's main core the Open Software movement coming from Richard Stallman. This is at all means just the building block of my idea. I need more people that are gifted in these domains

being closed source completely rules it out from being part of the decentralized web. Agreed. Certainly, open source software that is hosted on a server can still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't generally verify that the server is running the same code that's in public /...\ source control. This BTW is only correct as far as it pertains to the secrecy of the information handled by the software.  Though even unmodified code would often leave data accessible to administrators anyways. To assess correctness of execution there is a proven way: one can always /...\ software at multiple server (or rather peers in that case) at the same time and have them audit each other. (I.e. each peer would almost act as if it was the server, but check with the net whether the result is acceptable according the the underlying "smart contract". The check

attempt to solve the need to trust Citibank's remote service, but I do offer a way to extend Citibank's software at runtime without compromising its integrity. Mint, in this case, is one such extension ("now with more graphs!"). What Web applications choose to make alterable is at their /...\ other, > The trust question I'm investigating is application-integrity during third-party extension. Autonomy means, in this case, freedom to introduce new software without the host's blessing, like how an OS protects its kernel so that 3rd party code can execute without auditing by the OS vendor /...\ that we can't modify them anymore.  Dev time... Furthermore we're running the askemos.org and other web sites from our own software and test network.  That is we actually test that we can run it from cheap peers behind consumer grade ADSL lines at home

being closed source completely rules it out from being part of the decentralized web. Agreed. Certainly, open source software that is hosted on a server can still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't generally verify that the server is running the same code that's in public /...\ source control. This BTW is only correct as far as it pertains to the secrecy of the information handled by the software.  Though even unmodified code would often leave data accessible to administrators anyways. To assess correctness of execution there is a proven way: one can always /...\ software at multiple server (or rather peers in that case) at the same time and have them audit each other. (I.e. each peer would almost act as if it was the server, but check with the net whether the result is acceptable according the the underlying "smart contract". The check

being closed source completely rules it out from being part of the decentralized web. Agreed. Certainly, open source software that is hosted on a server can still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't generally verify that the server is running the same code that's in public /...\ source control. This BTW is only correct as far as it pertains to the secrecy of the information handled by the software.  Though even unmodified code would often leave data accessible to administrators anyways. To assess correctness of execution there is a proven way: one can always /...\ software at multiple server (or rather peers in that case) at the same time and have them audit each other. (I.e. each peer would almost act as if it was the server, but check with the net whether the result is acceptable according the the underlying "smart contract". The check

subvert laws. For one, it's a dangerously inaccurate. For two, it's not what I'm here for. None of the software you mention even addresses net neutrality. You use "censorship" very vaguely, and your post mostly reads as an attempt to echo back the community's ideas. Anybody /...\ sure bet at least some people if asked on the street might also say 'Bitcoin' (or alternately, "what's P2P?" or "Software!")  So you'll get a lot of responses and responses will vary substantially, but this is my sense based on talking to people I know around /...\ least in primary school levels) can understand it and act on things presented in it within less than a minute.  Look. Software. Click (one click, two max!) to get it. Done. 2) What are some ways to Decentralize Everything? To the DNS and beyond? Stuff that comes

being closed source completely rules it out from being part of the decentralized web. Agreed. Certainly, open source software that is hosted on a server can still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't generally verify that the server is running the same code that's in public /...\ source control. This BTW is only correct as far as it pertains to the secrecy of the information handled by the software.  Though even unmodified code would often leave data accessible to administrators anyways. To assess correctness of execution there is a proven way: one can always /...\ software at multiple server (or rather peers in that case) at the same time and have them audit each other. (I.e. each peer would almost act as if it was the server, but check with the net whether the result is acceptable according the the underlying "smart contract". The check

site (if you have bower) with : "bower install web-map". There are some map services available here:  http://geogratis.gc.ca/mapml/en/  And server software is available on github OR for issues with the specs or the software:  https://github.com/Maps4HTML  Pleased to discuss here or in issues

experienced enough to judge whether this is true. But it fosters my idea that we must talk about control, not about software. If it is true that some services requires centralization, we have to control the centralized infrastructure by appropriate means. For example: In Germany the top level domain /...\ make strange laws. If you can read German this might entertain you. http://www.sudelbuch.de/2014/08/15/nimm-doch-mal-wieder-das-pferd/ So. In one word. Let us discuss not only software but also alternative means of common control. Ciao

level-- we need to start thinking about algorithms and their spaces of execution as social statements. In the information age, they are. The way software is structured and executed affects the form and function of the socioeconomic realm. On Apr 6, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com /...\ reliance on upstream decisions. Because there is no process model in the application layer, there is no opportunity to reconfigure individual components in the software. The scripts are merged into a single program.   By instead splitting Web applications into multiple programs using Web Workers, we can disentangle

sure bet at least some people if asked on the street might also say 'Bitcoin' (or alternately, "what's P2P?" or "Software!") So you'll get a lot of responses and responses will vary substantially, but this is my sense based on talking to people /...\ that anyone (at least in primary school levels) can understand it and act on things presented in it within less than a minute. Look. Software. Click (one click, two max!) to get it. Done. 2) What are some ways to Decentralize Everything? To the DNS and beyond? Stuff that comes

bugs the heck out of me that you'd ever have to work somewhere to edit the software. To frame this conversation, let me assert this: "The Web became less  anti-fragile once hosting became more complex than creating marked-up documents." At that point, you couldn /...\ integrated > into any website (preferably with single-session support). > > I've just finished a blogpost on the topic of "Antifragile Software > Ecosystems" and how decentralization aids in achieving this: > > https://opkode.com/blog/2014/01/14/antifragile-software-ecosystems > > I'd appreciate you guys and gals reading

infrastructure for personal computing. The way Apple uses cloud is close to what we ought to be trying to build in the more free/open software community. Apple uses cloud exactly this way— as dumb storage and support for rich endpoint devices. They just don’t do the open /...\ know what you think and any corrections I can make. I personally enjoy both the technical and the social/political issues of decentralized software and I hope some of you do too. Cheers

Please check out my decentralized dev and runtime platform called > Hiveware at www.hiveware.com which stands for Hyperstructured > Interactive Virtual Environment softWare. I have been working on it > for many years. I expect to launch the engine by the end of the year > called the Hiveware /...\ painting, but that is not directly supported in today's Internet. And you can share it with responsibility and mutual respect undergirded by interlocking software structures. This is what Hiveware does. It creates the potential for a new Internet where cooperative sharing can take place while maintaining ownerships (there

hybrid peer to peer protocol that creates virtual Ethernet networks (plural). ZeroTier is more like SDN for everyone, everywhere. (SDN is software defined networking, and refers to the creation of software defined virtual networks in data centers.) I've been following CJDNS for a while. I know it's being

hybrid peer to peer protocol that creates virtual Ethernet networks (plural). ZeroTier is more like SDN for everyone, everywhere. (SDN is software defined networking, and refers to the creation of software defined virtual networks in data centers.) I've been following CJDNS for a while. I know it's being

On Aug 14, 2014, at 1:30 AM, David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: It

good idea, it will result in a highly insecure product. I'll certainly NOT invite you to find a hack or anything into the software we wrote as a proof of anything. That would be pseudo-scientific and no proof at all.  After all we might have /...\ find any, I hope you might find the results useful for you. You are also invited to hack around in the software.  If you find bugs or security vulnerabilities please report. We also need some good coders.  E.g. we'd like to have alternatives

seems like it would be easy to push the analogy too far, as custom, law, contracts, etc. are only vaguely similar to software. I would expect at least a few very interesting and annoying differences, though maybe also some surprising and useful isomorphisms. That's pretty much our experience /...\ just a different "machine" executing it: physical hardware or human agents.  But both are supposed to stick precisely to the rules until the software is changed.  (And both are usually buggy

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with

good idea, it will result in a highly insecure product. I'll certainly NOT invite you to find a hack or anything into the software we wrote as a proof of anything. That would be pseudo-scientific and no proof at all.  After all we might have /...\ find any, I hope you might find the results useful for you. You are also invited to hack around in the software.  If you find bugs or security vulnerabilities please report. We also need some good coders.  E.g. we'd like to have alternatives the SSL layer (currently

open and simple and straightforward. All those complicated, fragmented p2p monstrosities have their own peculiar APIs and very complex specifications. That means that software built upon them cannot interoperate easily with other software built upon others. IP and open standards like HTTP, JSON, XML, etc. are designed for heterogenous ecosystems

internet was different for a while. However, you may have noticed the trend of people using phones and tablets and get their software not from markets, but distribution systems like app stores. I fear the ideal that markets do the right thing is a joke because they are impossible /...\ corrections I can make.<br> I personally enjoy both the technical and the social/political issues of<br> decentralized software and I hope some of you do too.<br> <br> Cheers!<br> Max<br> </blockquo></div

other, > The trust question I'm investigating is application-integrity during third-party extension. Autonomy means, in this case, freedom to introduce new software without the host's blessing, like how an OS protects its kernel so that 3rd party code can execute without auditing by the OS vendor /...\ extend that we can't modify them anymore. Dev time... Furthermore we're running the askemos.org and other web sites from our own software and test network. That is we actually test that we can run it from cheap peers behind consumer grade ADSL lines at home. Most nodes

infrastructure for personal computing. The way Apple uses cloud is close to what we ought to be trying to build in the more free/open software community. Apple uses cloud exactly this way— as dumb storage and support for rich endpoint devices. They just don’t do the open /...\ know what you think and any corrections I can make. I personally enjoy both the technical and the social/political issues of decentralized software and I hope some of you do too. Cheers

sept. - 08:59, hellekin a écrit : > How is "redecentralization" compatible with proprietary software at all? It is not. I think this is the first message of this kind received on the list. > In the interview, I had understood that the project was about "open /...\ source" solutions. Now, open source is already free software without > ethics, but from there to "open read-only source", there's as huge a gap > as between vegan food and McDonald's. Am I on the wrong list? I think you're in the right

level-- we need to start thinking about algorithms and their spaces of execution as social statements. In the information age, they are. The way software is structured and executed affects the form and function of the socioeconomic realm. On Apr 6, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com /...\ reliance on upstream decisions. Because there is no process model in the application layer, there is no opportunity to reconfigure individual components in the software. The scripts are merged into a single program.   By instead splitting Web applications into multiple programs using Web Workers, we can disentangle the hard

working on a maybe-decentralized email list software (ypotf). You can interview me if I finish it, or perhaps if I don't. I use a bunch of things that might count because they communicate substantially less with networks than contemporary services do. * nmh (previously mutt and offlineimap) * fossil * MHTML /...\ recoll * recollweb * newsbeuter * Garmin eTrex 30 And, of course, once I have all this stuff locally, I read and edit files with assorted ordinary software I'm thinking about making a standalone ZIM file reader and connecting it to recoll because Kiwix is annoying to install and to use. Once

released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow

console). We have many planed projects like a micro-computer pre-installed (based on a Olinuxino Lime2), a Tor version, and integration in other software. The project is already available in Debian, Arch Linux and some other distros, but the versions there start to be old, we are preparing

Tarsnap for simple backup (yay for encryption!). I simply don't sync data between my devices because there's no _open source_ software that _securely_ allows me to do so. Tahoe-LAFS might be good enough, since at least I could access my data from everywhere, but it doesn

Redecentralizers:   Please check out my decentralized dev and runtime platform called Hiveware at www.hiveware.com which stands for Hyperstructured Interactive Virtual Environment softWare. I have been working on it for many years. I expect to launch the engine by the end of the year called the Hiveware Big Bang

expensive in the summer. Reading about the centralization of this mailing list, I recall that I am working on centralized mailing list software that is easier to administrate and is thus maybe a bit less centralized. http://tlevine.sdf.org/ypotf/wiki?name=interestingness

point of view :(  Can anyone put me in touch with a decentralized networking expert, ideally someone with a completely opensource project (hardware or software), who might be available in London towards the end of May? Thank you! --  Stephan Tual Chief Communications Officer Ethereum.org

David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow

these incredibly great ideas? My idea is to make a new social network that has at it's main core the Open Software movement coming from Richard Stallman. This is at all means just the building block of my idea. I need more people that are gifted in these domains

Yeah, I can't code or hear worth a damn, but I can write. If you want a blog post reviewing software, I can deliver. Especially if you need it from the point of view of someone who is not particularly tech savvy. If you want to give

David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow

David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow

David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow

David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow

David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ https://github.com/zrm/snow

released a development version of a new piece of software today that may > be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide > comments or bug reports it would be appreciated. > > http://www.trustiosity.com/snow/ > https://github.com/zrm/snow > this

Odinn Cyberguerrilla <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote: >> I released a development version of a new piece of software today that may >> be of interest to this list. If anyone is willing to try it and provide >> comments or bug reports it would be appreciated

access some known-censored content, and to do so through trusted nodes only. In principle there's nothing wrong with this model, and the software may indeed achieve that goal (given critical enough mass). The fact that it is unapologetically non-anonymous would be troublesome in any other context

seems like it would be easy to push the analogy too far, as custom, law, contracts, etc. are only vaguely similar to software. I would expect at least a few very interesting and annoying differences, though maybe also some surprising and useful isomorphisms. Dave

usual name resolution methods like DNS instead of using IP addresses. The names would only work for people with the software installed but so do the IP addresses. On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote: Heh. I should clarify that: you have

usual name resolution methods like DNS instead of using IP addresses. The names would only work for people with the software installed but so do the IP addresses. On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote: Heh. I should clarify that: you have

know what you think and any corrections I can make. I personally enjoy both the technical and the social/political issues of decentralized software and I hope some of you do too. Cheers

know what you think and any corrections I can make. I personally enjoy both the technical and the social/political issues of decentralized software and I hope some of you do too. Cheers

what you think and any corrections I can make. > I personally enjoy both the technical and the social/political > issues of > decentralized software and I hope some of you do too. > > Cheers

enjoy both the technical and the social/political >     issues of >     decentralized software and I hope some of you do too. > >     Cheers

corrections I can make. >> I personally enjoy both the technical and the social/political >> issues of >> decentralized software and I hope some of you do too. >> >> Cheers! >> Max >> >> > -- Christian de Larrinaga FBCS, CITP, MCMA

Internet is a manyfold challenge: it is a technical, a legal and political one. But it is also a financial challenge. To many free softwares and common goods projects are not financially supported. To many of these projects rely on the good will and the free time of a fistul

That brings up something that should go in everyone's "reasons things get centralized" list: Installing, maintaining, upgrading, and troubleshooting software installs is very hard and time consuming. Centralization delegates that responsibility to someone else for a fee, either monetary or in the form of implied consent to data mining

these incredibly great ideas? My idea is to make a new social network that has at it's main core the Open Software movement coming from Richard Stallman. This is at all means just the building block of my idea. I need more people that are gifted in these domains

wrote: > Yeah, I can't code or hear worth a damn, but I can write. If you > want a blog post reviewing software, I can deliver. Especially if > you need it from the point of view of someone who is not > particularly tech savvy

danny@knestaut.net > Yeah, I can't code or hear worth a damn, but I can write. If you want a blog post reviewing software, I can deliver. Especially if you need it from the point of view of someone who is not particularly tech savvy. If you want to give

code or hear worth a damn, but I can write. If you want >> a >> blog post reviewing software, I can deliver. Especially if you need >> it from >> the point of view of someone who is not particularly tech savvy

danny@knestaut.net > Yeah, I can't code or hear worth a damn, but I can write. If you want a blog post reviewing software, I can deliver. Especially if you need it from the point of view of someone who is not particularly tech savvy. If you want to give

danny@knestaut.net > Yeah, I can't code or hear worth a damn, but I can write. If you want a blog post reviewing software, I can deliver. Especially if you need it from the point of view of someone who is not particularly tech savvy. If you want to give

other. > > I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue > and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which > web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project > called Grimwire that's in this realm

involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy >>> issue and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable >>> software, which web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in >>> Austin on a project called Grimwire that's in this realm

other. > > I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue > and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which > web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project > called Grimwire that's in this realm

ambitious and thought-out projects I have seen so far. For the peer-to-peer connections, they are currently using an (optional) locally-installed software called "Avatar Bridge" which is aimed to fill the gap until WebRTC reaches maturity and wide browser support. There are voices declaring browser-side JavaScript

know each other. I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project called Grimwire that's in this realm. I'm also involved

involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue >> and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which >> web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project >> called Grimwire that's in this realm. I'm also involved

involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy >>> issue and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable >>> software, which web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in >>> Austin on a project called Grimwire that's in this realm

more deeply. The trust question I'm investigating is application-integrity during third-party extension. Autonomy means, in this case, freedom to introduce new software without the host's blessing, like how an OS protects its kernel so that 3rd party code can execute without auditing by the OS vendor

SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, This is my first email to this list so here's a short introduction :) I am a free-software and open-education volunteer mainly working on the XSCE (short for School Server Community Edition) project. I've volunteered for the OLPC project from

involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy >>> issue and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable >>> software, which web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in >>> Austin on a project called Grimwire that's in this realm

Please check out my decentralized dev and runtime platform called Hiveware > at www.hiveware.com which stands for Hyperstructured Interactive Virtual > Environment softWare. I have been working on it for many years. I expect to > launch the engine by the end of the year called the Hiveware Big Bang

integrated > into any website (preferably with single-session support). > > I've just finished a blogpost on the topic of "Antifragile Software > Ecosystems" and how decentralization aids in achieving this: > > https://opkode.com/blog/2014/01/14/antifragile-software-ecosystems > > I'd appreciate you guys and gals reading

being closed source completely rules it out from being part of the decentralized web. Certainly, open source software that is hosted on a server can still be silently backdoored in some ways -- you can't generally verify that the server is running the same code that's in public source

integrated into any website (preferably with single-session support). > > I've just finished a blogpost on the topic of "Antifragile Software Ecosystems" > and how decentralization aids in achieving this: > > https://opkode.com/blog/2014/01/14/antifragile-software-ecosystems > > I'd appreciate you guys and gals reading

ambitious and thought-out projects I have seen so far. For the peer-to-peer connections, they are currently using an (optional) locally-installed software called "Avatar Bridge" which is aimed to fill the gap until WebRTC reaches maturity and wide browser support. There are voices declaring browser-side JavaScript

ambitious and thought-out projects I have seen so far. For the peer-to-peer connections, they are currently using an (optional) locally-installed software called "Avatar Bridge" which is aimed to fill the gap until WebRTC reaches maturity and wide browser support. There are voices declaring browser-side JavaScript

Harvard University, such as Yochai Benkler or Primavera De Filippi Dynamic, young, interdisciplinary team with a horizontal and inclusive culture Combines social research + software tool building, focusing on social impact Attractive work conditions and perks, with multiple benefits Feel free to write any question/doubt to p2pmodels@ucm.es including in the subject

attempt to solve the need to trust Citibank's remote service, but I do offer a way to extend Citibank's software at runtime without compromising its integrity. Mint, in this case, is one such extension ("now with more graphs!"). What Web applications choose to make alterable is at their

attempt to solve the need to trust Citibank's remote service, but I do offer a way to extend Citibank's software at runtime without compromising its integrity. Mint, in this case, is one such extension ("now with more graphs!"). What Web applications choose to make alterable is at their

Tarsnap for simple backup (yay for encryption!). I simply don't sync data between my devices because there's no _open source_ software that _securely_ allows me to do so. Curious to know the specific reasons why Syncthing does not qualify

involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy >>> issue and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable >>> software, which web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in >>> Austin on a project called Grimwire that's in this realm

team on building privacy-enhancing technology, today in a capacity as an associate professor. So far we had 1.4 million installs of our Tribler software. Now we're got the TOR wire specs operational in Beta with modifications for UDP support. Plus backwards compatibility and anonymous streaming from existing Bittorrent

enhancing technology, today in a capacity as an associate >> professor. >> So far we had 1.4 million installs of our Tribler software. >> Now we're got the TOR wire specs operational in Beta with >> modifications for UDP support. >> Plus backwards compatibility

enhancing technology, today in a capacity as an associate >> professor. >> So far we had 1.4 million installs of our Tribler software. >> Now we're got the TOR wire specs operational in Beta with >> modifications for UDP support. >> Plus backwards compatibility

have a spec I started. But nobody wants it. Money, remember?) Pshhht, rendering? We’ll get new clien t hardware, new client software. Big whoop. I’m a lot more worried about whose EULA is going to govern  my life . --- -- konklone.com | @konklone

reliance on upstream decisions. Because there is no process model in the application layer, there is no opportunity to reconfigure individual components in the software. The scripts are merged into a single program.   By instead splitting Web applications into multiple programs using Web Workers, we can disentangle

reliance on upstream decisions. Because there is no process model in the application layer, there is no opportunity to reconfigure individual components in the software. The scripts are merged into a single program.   By instead splitting Web applications into multiple programs using Web Workers, we can disentangle

Just a quick reminder to tell you that it is our last hours to support IndieHosters IndieHosters is a network of hoster of free software as a service where the user is free to migrate from one service provider to another. More information: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/indiehosters/x/9169969 Founded by Michiel

know each other. I'm involved with redecentralize projects due to the privacy issue and out of an interest in simpler, user-modifiable software, which web systems tend to restrict. I work solo in Austin on a project called Grimwire that's in this realm. I'm also involved

that can be integrated into any website (preferably with single-session support). I've just finished a blogpost on the topic of "Antifragile Software Ecosystems" and how decentralization aids in achieving this: https://opkode.com/blog/2014/01/14/antifragile-software-ecosystems I'd appreciate you guys and gals reading it and sharing your ideas

ambitious and thought-out projects I have seen so far. For the peer-to-peer connections, they are currently using an (optional) locally-installed software called "Avatar Bridge" which is aimed to fill the gap until WebRTC reaches maturity and wide browser support. There are voices declaring browser

SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, This is my first email to this list so here's a short introduction :) I am a free-software and open-education volunteer mainly working on the XSCE (short for School Server Community Edition) project. I've volunteered for the OLPC project from

running plugins in Web applications. As I mentioned earlier, it's goal is to improve user autonomy from hosts by freely extending Web software at runtime. If anybody wants to discuss how they might put the framework to use in an application, feel free to email me ( pfrazee@gmail.com ) or ping

team on building privacy-enhancing technology, today in a capacity as an associate professor. So far we had 1.4 million installs of our Tribler software. Now we're got the TOR wire specs operational in Beta with modifications for UDP support. Plus backwards compatibility and anonymous streaming from existing Bittorrent

anyone. (I have a spec I started. But nobody wants it. Money, remember?) Pshhht, rendering? We’ll get new client hardware, new client software. Big whoop. I’m a lot more worried about whose EULA is going to govern  my life

reliance on upstream decisions. Because there is no process model in the application layer, there is no opportunity to reconfigure individual components in the software. The scripts are merged into a single program.   By instead splitting Web applications into multiple programs using Web Workers, we can disentangle

point of view :(  Can anyone put me in touch with a decentralized networking expert, ideally someone with a completely opensource project (hardware or software), who might be available in London towards the end of May? Thank you! --  Stephan Tual Chief Communications Officer Ethereum.org

know what you think and any corrections I can make. I personally enjoy both the technical and the social/political issues of decentralized software and I hope some of you do too. Cheers

these incredibly great ideas? My idea is to make a new social network that has at it's main core the Open Software movement coming from Richard Stallman. This is at all means just the building block of my idea. I need more people that are gifted in these domains