suitable
for understanding. The narrative of "redecentralize", as far as I
understand it, is about redistributing power to the users of
technologies,
to involve them in their creation, not only their consumption. If you see,
as a psycholinguist,
technological innovation as something coming from
experts and dependent
/...\ shift requires both global coordination and local autonomy. Only
software freedom can achieve the latter. As to the former, only politics
can do it.
Technology alone, especially proprietary
technologies, cannot
provide the necessary empowerment for local communities to adapt it to their
actual needs, and no special committee can ever
/...\ Actually, I'm a trained and practicing computer scientist as well and
program 8 hours a day, so I in no way feel that
technology is "coming from
experts and dependent on them" so may I please be allowed to discuss my
technology as part of the current
make it
technologically such that even if they win politically it will be costly or quixotic to implement a non-neutral net
How would this work?
Feross â©Â blog | â studynotes | â®Â webtorrent
/...\ Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote:
One reason it's important to keep working on the
technology is to remove the incentive for carriers (and others) to fight net neutrality. If we make it
technologically such that even if they win politically it will be costly or quixotic to implement
/...\ impossible, and should be one of the things the Internet works to make happen.
At the same time, we should keep working on the
technology. After all, the strong belief in net neutrality that much of society (and the US government) has is due to
technology shaping culture and norms
implement discrimination.
On Jan 14, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Feross Aboukhadijeh < feross@feross.org > wrote:
>Â If we make it
technologically such that even if they win politically it will be costly or quixotic to implement a non-neutral net
How would this work?
Feross
/...\ Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote:
One reason it's important to keep working on the
technology is to remove the incentive for carriers (and others) to fight net neutrality. If we make it
technologically such that even if they win politically it will be costly or quixotic to implement
/...\ impossible, and should be one of the things the Internet works to make happen.
At the same time, we should keep working on the
technology. After all, the strong belief in net neutrality that much of society (and the US government) has is due to
technology shaping culture and norms
costly to implement discrimination. On Jan 14, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Feross Aboukhadijeh < feross@feross.org > wrote: > If we make it
technologically such that even if they win politically it will be costly or quixotic to implement a non-neutral net
How would this work?
Feross
/...\ Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote:
One reason it's important to keep working on the
technology is to remove the incentive for carriers (and others) to fight net neutrality. If we make it
technologically such that even if they win politically it will be costly or quixotic to implement
/...\ impossible, and should be one of the things the Internet works to make happen.
At the same time, we should keep working on the
technology. After all, the strong belief in net neutrality that much of society (and the US government) has is due to
technology shaping culture and norms
reason it's important to keep working on the
technology is to remove the incentive for carriers (and others) to fight net neutrality. If we make it
technologically such that even if they win politically it will be costly or quixotic to implement a non-neutral net, we make them
/...\ impossible, and should be one of the things the Internet works to make happen.
At the same time, we should keep working on the
technology. After all, the strong belief in net neutrality that much of society (and the US government) has is due to
technology shaping culture and norms
/...\ think of achieving victory over the opponent." - Odagiri Sekiei
(Muji-Shin-Jen ryū) Nor do I think that
technological solutions are
everything. But that's what I'm asking about here.
3) That said, here's getting to what I intended to emphasize:
The process of decentralization needs
P S [LibreList] First Person Technologies 2014-03-29 17:32:15 first-person human decisions based on untrusted, commercial third-party inputs. http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2014/03/19/why-we-need-first-person-technologies-on-the-net/ --- There are social influences on how we use first person
technologies, of course, just as there are social influences on how we speak. But that does not diminish the personal nature of what we do with
/...\ GoPro camera.) We have none of them with our smart mobile devices today. Not yet, anyway. Books in the physical world are first person
technologies as well. Digital ones we “buy” from Amazon are not, because they come with leashes. Eben asks, “What if every book
/...\ back our privacy, or make real progress toward real personal freedom, until we develop and deploy first person
technologies for everybody. Without them our democracies and marketplaces will also continue to be compromised, because both require those three virtues of privacy. ... Solutions here will come, like our own voices, from
They want to be able to curate the content their students have access to.
> - School principal is open to deploying
technology and exploring new
> methods of learning. Currently they pay some money to a proprietary
> content vendor but they want to get out that deal gradually with
/...\ automatically implies people
> on the ground will have the time, resources and energy to take things
> forward and take ownership of the
technology they're setting up/using.
>
> --
> Anish
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:47 PM, hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org
/...\ good", that "democracy" is
> "necessary", that "transparency" is "appropriate", or that "
technology"
> will bring all solutions to all problems. They often fail to consider
> the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from
first-person human decisions based on untrusted, commercial third-party inputs.
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2014/03/19/why-we-need-first-person-technologies-on-the-net/
--- There are social influences on how we use first person
technologies,
of course, just as there are social influences on how we speak. But that does not diminish the personal nature of what we do with
/...\ GoPro camera.) We have none of them with our smart mobile devices today. Not yet, anyway.
Books in the physical world are first person
technologies as well. Digital ones we “buy” from Amazon are not, because they come with leashes. Eben asks, “What if every book
/...\ back our privacy, or make real progress toward real personal freedom, until we develop and deploy first person
technologies for everybody. Without them our democracies and marketplaces will also continue to be compromised, because both require those three virtues of privacy.
... Solutions here will come, like our own voices, from
which resulted in Y" - They want to be able to curate the content their students have access to. - School principal is open to deploying
technology and exploring new methods of learning. Currently they pay some money to a proprietary content vendor but they want to get out that deal gradually
/...\ since that automatically implies people on the ground will have the time, resources and energy to take things forward and take ownership of the
technology they're setting up/using. -- Anish On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:47 PM, hellekin < hellekin@gnu.org > wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
/...\ wrong. An awful lot of
ideologies today assume that "progress" is "good", that "democracy" is
"necessary", that "transparency" is "appropriate", or that "
technology"
will bring all solutions to all problems. They often fail to consider
the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from
They want to be able to curate the content their students have
> access to.
> > - School principal is open to deploying
technology and exploring new
> > methods of learning. Currently they pay some money to a proprietary
> > content vendor but they want
/...\ people
> > on the ground will have the time, resources and energy to take things
> > forward and take ownership of the
technology they're setting up/using.
> >
> > --
> > Anish
/...\ good", that "democracy" is
> > "necessary", that "transparency" is "appropriate", or that
> "
technology"
> > will bring all solutions to all problems. They often fail to consider
> > the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend
They want to be able to curate the content their students have access to.
> - School principal is open to deploying
technology and exploring new
> methods of learning. Currently they pay some money to a proprietary
> content vendor but they want to get out that deal gradually with
/...\ automatically implies people
> on the ground will have the time, resources and energy to take things
> forward and take ownership of the
technology they're setting up/using.
>
> --
> Anish
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:47 PM, hellekin < hellekin@gnu.org
/...\ awful lot of
> ideologies today assume that "progress" is "good", that "democracy" is
> "necessary", that "transparency" is "appropriate", or that "
technology"
> will bring all solutions to all problems. They often fail to consider
> the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from
impossible, and should be one of the things the Internet works to make happen.
At the same time, we should keep working on the
technology. After all, the strong belief in net neutrality that much of society (and the US government) has is due to
technology shaping culture and norms
/...\ think of achieving victory over the opponent." - Odagiri Sekiei
(Muji-Shin-Jen ryū)  Nor do I think that
technological solutions are
everything. But that's what I'm asking about here.
3) That said, here's getting to what I intended to emphasize:
The process
/...\ written by Musashi around
1645.
This e-mail is already too long so I am going to stop here and repeat my
request for
technological suggestions. Â Have any?
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> Hi Odinn
suitable for understanding. The narrative of "redecentralize", as
far as I understand it, is about redistributing power to the users of
technologies, to involve them in their creation, not only their
consumption. If you see, as a psycholinguist,
technological innovation
as something coming from experts and dependent
/...\ shift requires both global coordination and local
autonomy. Only software freedom can achieve the latter. As to the
former, only politics can do it.
Technology alone, especially
proprietary
technologies, cannot provide the necessary empowerment for
local communities to adapt it to their actual needs, and no special
committee can ever
/...\ aspect, specifically designed to tame corporate fears about
anything social. It succeeded in bringing free software to the
mainstream, but it fails to inflect
technological innovation towards
inclusive goals beyond the elite class of technologists.
> interlocking software structures. This is what Hiveware does.
>
I'm not sure that
good", that "democracy" is
"necessary", that "transparency" is "appropriate", or that "
technology"
will bring all solutions to all problems. They often fail to consider
the genealogy and diversity of situations and tend to remove from "the
big picture
/...\ purchasing power to fulfill their own agenda. There's
nothing automatic in accessing the Internet and magically obtaining
empowerment. As you embrace new
technologies, your environment changes,
and with it your organism, from biological to political. With the few
hindsight we have gained on communication
technologies, we can tell that
/...\ powers already there can use them to their advantage as much as wannabe
liberation
technologies, except at a must large scale: they act as
amplifiers, but when everyone is shouting, who's listening? As much as
I like the Internet, I'm still worried that promoting its expansion is
more
using p2p to be something thieves and drug dealers and the
terrible "hackers" use.
I always tell people, investment is not made in great
technology,
great
technology is made with investment.
I am 100% with you here and it was at the heart of my post. We
need to figure
/...\ society to spend resources on
decentralized and p2p
technologies over centralized ones. People
need to pay for this stuff because there is no other way for it to
get better.
And, as you described, the "free" model is a lie and really is a
determinant to peoples freedoms
/...\ paid for
decentralized systems, we’d get richer — both in terms of
freedom and privacy and in terms of opportunities for new
technology businesses.
On Apr 3, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Adam Ierymenko
< adam.ierymenko
@zerotier.com > wrote:
I
LOVE the term “grass computing!”
This
think of achieving victory over the opponent." - Odagiri Sekiei
(Muji-Shin-Jen ryū) Nor do I think that
technological solutions are
everything. But that's what I'm asking about here.
3) That said, here's getting to what I intended to emphasize:
The process of decentralization needs
/...\ written by Musashi around
1645.
This e-mail is already too long so I am going to stop here and repeat my
request for
technological suggestions. Have any?
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Odinn
/...\ that would not be
> vulnerable to a well funded and very smart attacker's distributed DDOS or
> other disruption efforts.
>
>
Technology can only be at best half the fix for the panopticon problem.
> The other half has to be political
source project (which is XSCE
- School Server Community Edition) , it is a loose group
of volunteers collaborating remotely, but working
locally with a common
technology base. There would be
some NGOs, some companies, some individuals in the mix.
Curious to know what you imply by NGO model
/...\ strong
believer in grassroots movements and local ownership of
technology. My focus over the next few months is to make
the
technology available in human readable form, so anyone
can understand, deploy using whatever model that fits best
in their scenario.
Cheers,
Anish
Ira [Email] There's more to decentralisation 2018-09-25 13:51:19.9682 more to decentralisation than blockchain Being âdecentralised' isnât good in and of itself,
technology can also be used for evil so we should think about the ends not just the means For me, this means focusing on decentralising power by distributing control, knowledge
/...\ capability to the network Also considering what values we can enshrine through the use of
technology - such as promoting agency, privacy, collaboration and choice An ecosystem of alternatives that work together and collaborate through open protocols is more compelling than one killer app Full post is here: https://medium.com/coinmonks/how-decentralised-are-you-a6539eeb27ff
tell you that private property in general does not make much sense
to me.
> may I please be allowed to discuss my technology as part of the
> current P2P diaspora? My technology is anything but proprietary
> in the traditional sense. Just because I maintain that
increase in the short term, but the whole thing is resting on the supremacy of its technical architecture. So if somebody breaks the
technology *or* somebody comes up with something better or even a worthwhile but incompatible improvement to Bitcoin itself, when everyone stops using Bitcoin in favor
/...\ certainly damn interesting. But pets.com and flooz? Not so much.
I still need to take a deep, deep dive into the block chain
technology. I get the very basic surface of it, but I am really curious about how it might be used as part of a solution
tell you that private property in general does not make much sense to
me.
> may I please be allowed to discuss my technology as part of the
> current P2P diaspora? My technology is anything but proprietary in the
> traditional sense. Just because I maintain that
past 16 years I have been working with my research team on
>> building
>> privacy-enhancing technology, today in a capacity as an associate
>> professor.
>> So far we had 1.4 million installs of our Tribler software
past 16 years I have been working with my research team on
>> building
>> privacy-enhancing technology, today in a capacity as an associate
>> professor.
>> So far we had 1.4 million installs of our Tribler software
exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is
interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
in how technology can help us all and how we can keep the web open and
free. I have a background in internet marketing so I also look
Michael Rogers [LibreList] London meetups 2014-01-10 14:25:07 BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
There are at least three groups trying to organise regular London
meetups for people working on technology for social change: Techno
Activism Third Mondays, Redecentralize, and Spring of Code. I'd like
to suggest that we pool our efforts and have
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-02 17:46:44 able to run on as many platforms
and to be easy to use, Avatar is implemented via JavaScript in the web
browser. Looking the technology preview description [1], this seems the
be one the most ambitious and thought-out projects I have seen so far.
For the peer-to-peer
Please re-tweet..
(https://twitter.com/TriblerTeam/status/445971016972787712)
For the past 16 years I have been working with my research team on building
privacy-enhancing technology, today in a capacity as an associate professor.
So far we had 1.4 million installs of our Tribler software
Stephan Tual [LibreList] London panelist? 2014-04-25 14:50:43 concept of distributed consensus and cryptographic proof that makes cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin so effective in trustless payments, Ethereum extends the use of these technologies to trustless agreements. This allows developers to easily build innovative new products on a censorship and collusion-resistant foundation." Potential use cases
JSconf EU, we're doing it in Berlin, and we also broadened the topic a bit to basically any cool stuff related to web technology and decentralization.
Hope to see you there! Cheers, Michiel
juh [GG] Zeronet and Twister anyone 2016-04-06 22:31:00 setup your
own blog with a mouse click.
Twister is a blockchain Twitter alternative.
http://twister.net.co/
Zeronet and Twister use implementations of the blockchain technology and
Bittorrent to setup the netwerk and distribute the content.
While Twister is limited to microblogging functionality Zeronet aims to
setup all kind of services
will.sch [LibreList] RDC 15 2015-10-15 13:25:28 exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is
interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
in how technology can help us all and how we can keep the web open and
free. I have a background in internet marketing so I also look
grant fund - Tech to Unite
Us!
We've been thinking about the
affordances of tech and equality, and we think
decentralising digital technologies have a
huge role to play in reimaging systems, services
and products with equality and inclusion at the
core.
I've included a blurb about
Jeremie Miller [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] London panelist? 2014-04-25 08:01:11 concept of distributed consensus and cryptographic proof that makes cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin so effective in trustless payments, Ethereum extends the use of these technologies to trustless agreements. This allows developers to easily build innovative new products on a censorship and collusion-resistant foundation." Potential use cases
Europython talk:
"Consider my slide about hierarchy and power: it works when the people
with authority derive their power through evidence. Unfortunately,
technology can be used to manipulate power in a way that is analogous
to the way aristocratic power works: "Why are you my King
line of research and technology that I personally find very exciting, and highly relevant to the idea of zero-knowledge centralization -- even though it's still some time off from being scalably useful -- is homomorphic encryption .
Homomorphic encryption is a technique where you take two inputs, encrypt them with
viewed by *anyone*. :) -Adam On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:48 PM, Eric Mill < eric@konklone.com > wrote: One line of research and technology that I personally find very exciting, and highly relevant to the idea of zero-knowledge centralization -- even though it's still some time off from being
able to deny
changes.) This is a trust decision wrt. the person administrating the
peer and the peer hardware and maybe more. Nothing technological means
can judge; it's a judgment about those very means among more. Ergo:
publications and messages may leave the commissioned set, private data
will never
increase in the short term, but the whole thing is resting on the supremacy of its technical architecture. So if somebody breaks the technology *or* somebody comes up with something better or even a worthwhile but incompatible improvement to Bitcoin itself, when everyone stops using Bitcoin in favor
flood plain by the time the rain comes.
> I still need to take a deep, deep dive into the block chain technology. I get the very basic surface of it, but I am really curious about how it might be used as part of a solution to the trust
deny changes.) This is a trust decision
> wrt. the person administrating the peer and the peer hardware and
> maybe more. Nothing technological means can judge; it's a judgment
> about those very means among more. Ergo: publications and messages
> may leave the commissioned set, private data
usage data,
screen space coming to attention of users, all useful for tracking
and showing ads which brings monetization.
2. Easy Deployment: current web technology makes it easy to control
the client-side code from a server (javascript/browsers),
allowing to reduce latency and to do code upgrades without
manual intervention
space coming to attention of users, all useful for tracking
> and showing ads which brings monetization.
>
> 2. Easy Deployment: current web technology makes it easy to control
> the client-side code from a server (javascript/browsers),
> allowing to reduce latency and to do code upgrades without
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-17 01:17:28 exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is
interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
in how technology can help us all and how we can keep the web open and
free. I have a background in internet marketing so I also look
demand from something akin to git.)
Two effects: a) no more tracking (+) b) no money from tracking (-).
> 2. Easy Deployment: current web technology makes it easy to control
> the client-side code from a server (javascript/browsers),
> allowing to reduce latency and to do code upgrades without
your question about market forces? My answer would be, what
market forces? I don't believe the technologies are chosen because
the market chooses them. An example for you is one you may deal
with many times in your life. Every time you go to a super market
side is of course that it
works today - you can already share between ownCloud instances and we hope
that the reliance on well known technologies makes it easy for others like
pydio etc to implement (they got the draft in advance, btw, so did several
others, including some standards organizations
exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is interested come and
> say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest in how technology
> can help us all and how we can keep the web open and free. I have a
> background in internet marketing
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-16 13:38:46 exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is
interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
in how technology can help us all and how we can keep the web open and
free. I have a background in internet marketing so I also look
into account is the question. "Do my
friends use it".
As more an more friends use Signal, I think it is worth trying.
Communication technology that nobody uses accept me is not yet worth trying
paid for decentralized systems, we’d get richer — both in terms of freedom and privacy and in terms of opportunities for new technology businesses. On Apr 3, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote: I LOVE the term “grass computing!” This slide
interest. Even when there is no extra ambition, it is incredibly hard to understand causalities related with mixing disruptive technology and ancient cultures. In case of skynet and what we had experimented with in Ladakh, there is no organization or immediate plan for organization, and there
able to run on as many platforms
and to be easy to use, Avatar is implemented via JavaScript in the web
browser. Looking the technology preview description [1], this seems the
be one the most ambitious and thought-out projects I have seen so far.
For the peer-to-peer
Hosting.
>> I haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie
>> together a bunch of the technologies people here are working on.
>>
>>
>> I could also imagine using Docker and a "packaging" format
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Yesterday's London meet-up 2014-01-08 10:49:44 exchanged emails and a group of us met for a P2P sprint in November
2013 working in small groups on various different bits of technology
in both a practical "hacking" sense (i.e. we wrote code) and in a
broader philosophical / architectural sense (i.e. we debated,
discussed and brainstormed
networks, and fewer people wanting/needing to search as things get put in front of them via their networks -- and their deprioritization of open web technologies. See Eric Schmidt's display of righteous anger at Twitter blocking Google from indexing tweets.
-- Eric
Feross Aboukhadijeh [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] decentralization Yahoo group 2013-12-30 18:29:36 challenges that Jer referred to coming through. Specifically over the past year I have worked on a couple of commercial P2P type technology solutions compared to none over the previous 15 years.
But xkcd summarizes those types of data points more succinctly :) http://xkcd.com/605/ Â > Date
tech turn up in unexpected places
> https://blog.twitter.com/2010/murder-fast-datacenter-code-deploys-using-bittorrent
I think that’s an unfortunate example: that’s a decentralised technology used for better centralisation (where a centralised service is large enough to be decentralised internally.) I.e., it does not avoid the reliance on centralised end-user
unexpected places
> https://blog.twitter.com/2010/murder-fast-datacenter-code-deploys-using-bittorrent
I think thatâs an unfortunate example: thatâs a decentralised technology used for better centralisation (where a centralised service is large enough to be decentralised internally.) I.e., it does not avoid the reliance on centralised end-user
model of Easier Self-Hosting. I haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie together a bunch of the technologies people here are working on.Â
I could also imagine using Docker and a "packaging" format consisting of some pretty basic manifest metadata that
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 23:56:09 Easier Self-Hosting. I
> haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie
> together a bunch of the technologies people here are working on.
>
> I could also imagine using Docker and a "packaging" format consisting
> of some pretty basic
haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie
>> Â together a bunch of the technologies people here are working on.
>>
>>
>> I could also imagine using Docker and a "packaging" format
>> consisting of some pretty
haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie
>> Â together a bunch of the technologies people here are working on.
>>
>>
>> I could also imagine using Docker and a "packaging" format
>> consisting of some pretty
Jeremie Miller [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Yesterday's London meet-up 2014-01-08 06:03:22 emails and a group of us met for a P2P sprint in November
> 2013 working in small groups on various different bits of technology
> in both a practical "hacking" sense (i.e. we wrote code) and in a
> broader philosophical / architectural sense (i.e. we debated
Thomas Levine [GG] Distributed Dance Party update 2018-06-18 23:34:00 d69a94dd-9eca-4eee-9b8c-4aa656bdea42]
 Anarchaportugal will curate the most liberated minds in blockchain
 technology, economics, governance philosophy, social sciences, machine
 learning, science fiction, consciousness and biohacking. Blend in artists,
 developers, wellness experts, students and designers as we chart the course
aware of any meshnet that would not be vulnerable to a well funded and very smart attacker's distributed DDOS or other disruption efforts.
Technology can only be at best half the fix for the panopticon problem. The other half has to be political
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Yesterday's London meet-up 2014-01-15 14:37:29 group of us met for a P2P sprint in
> November 2013 working in small groups on various different bits of
> technology in both a practical "hacking" sense (i.e. we wrote code)
> and in a broader philosophical / architectural sense (i.e. we
> debated, discussed and brainstormed
able to run on as many
platforms
and to be easy to use, Avatar is implemented via JavaScript
in the web
browser. Looking the technology preview description [1],
this seems the
be one the most ambitious and thought-out projects I have
seen so far.
For the peer-to-peer
able to run on as many
platforms
and to be easy to use, Avatar is implemented via JavaScript
in the web
browser. Looking the technology preview description [1],
this seems the
be one the most ambitious and thought-out projects I have
seen so far.
For the peer-to-peer
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] february meetup 2014-02-03 09:04:42 little more into the tech scene I plan to spread around some interest. There is a huge amount of technology stuff here (not quite as much as the Bay up North, but a lot), so I'm sure there will be interested people
holger krekel [LibreList] any meeting point for tonight? 2015-10-16 08:18:38 exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest in how technology can help us all and how we can keep the web open and free. I have a background in internet marketing so I also look
remain focused on
building the "next Google", but when you look at the underground
digital scene, what is striking is the vitality of decentralized
technologies. The bitcoin being the most visible today. So there
is a lot of relevance for Europe to massively invest in the
decentralization
haven't seen anything like it right now, but maybe it could tie
>> together a bunch of the technologies people here are working on.
>>
>>
>> I could also imagine using Docker and a "packaging" format
>> consisting of some pretty basic
exploring the ideas behind this if anyone is
interested come and say hello. Asides from this I have a deep interest
in how technology can help us all and how we can keep the web open and
free. I have a background in internet marketing so I also look
roots. Please re-tweet..
( https://twitter.com/TriblerTeam/status/445971016972787712 )
For the past 16 years I have been working with my research team on building
privacy-enhancing technology, today in a capacity as an associate professor.
So far we had 1.4 million installs of our Tribler software