Login

Redecentralize

We’ve had enough of digital monopolies and surveillance capitalism. We want an alternative world that works for everyone, just like the original intention of the web and net.

We seek a world of open platforms and protocols with real choices of applications and services for people. We care about privacy, transparency and autonomy. Our tools and organisations should fundamentally be accountable and resilient.

Home
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-03 10:45:39
value store with PUT and GET. Each key has a corresponding public key submitted with it that can be used to authorize future updates of the same key. Keys expire after one year. That's it. > > Or could we go even more minimal than that? Maybe: forget /...\ keys, don't allow any peer to simply update a value. (Why? Assume the "value" is the ownership property of some coin or other unique resource. How to manage transfer? The update could be malicious.) Instead: link the value to some script, which is invoked /...\ storing" (better now "maintaining") node to compute the update upon request. (Take the script as some kind of "contract" governing the update rules. No peer simply accepts updates, the check the contract to verify the update complies with the terms.) At this point the design
Nicholas H.Tollervey [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Re: Trustworthy Contract Handling - Comparison Of Approaches 2014-08-15 17:46:37
data I *really* care about > which I can physically secure. > > At this point we can ask how we may update automated agents. > Sometimes they might just have a single owner, but often control is > to be purposefully split. At this point the GET/PUT semantics /...\ conditions. The other object would be the > contract governing the agents actions on incoming requests. No > script object found: either no updates or locate script in the > object itself. > > Now we need "trust but verify": since we must not allow any single /...\ human to control the agent, we can not allow a single computer to > compute the update and then somehow copy the new state to other > peers. After all the origin peer might be a traitor. We need > autonomy from individual intent for these agents. Therefore
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Re: Trustworthy Contract Handling - Comparison Of Approaches 2014-08-07 11:31:57
have one copy of all data I *really* care about which I can physically secure. At this point we can ask how we may update automated agents. Sometimes they might just have a single owner, but often control is to be purposefully split. At this point the GET/PUT semantics /...\ readable terms and conditions. The other object would be the contract governing the agents actions on incoming requests. No script object found: either no updates or locate script in the object itself. Now we need "trust but verify": since we must not allow any single human to control /...\ agent, we can not allow a single computer to compute the update and then somehow copy the new state to other peers. After all the origin peer might be a traitor. We need autonomy from individual intent for these agents. Therefore we have several peers (notaries) commissioned to backup
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] ZeroTier One public beta (binaries) for Macintosh and Linux 2014-02-13 10:55:53
console window. I've also built the Qt GUI for Windows and it works well too. There are two remaining Windows issues: 1) Auto-update on Windows. I finally found a good free MSI packager that is good enough, but I will need to test. I will also need /...\ figure out the update dance. On OSX and Linux the app can download the update, verify it against the list of authorized update signing certs, and then exec() the update in place. On Windows the service has to execute some kind of intermediate, die, and then the intermediate /...\ update and then start the service again. Annoying... more moving parts, more to fail. 2) The Windows version takes care of automatically installing instances of the tap driver, which is a fork of the OpenVPN tap-windows driver with some extra ioctls that I added to support a few things
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] ZeroTier One public beta (binaries) for Macintosh and Linux 2014-02-13 13:00:12
console window. I've also built the Qt GUI for Windows and it works well too. There are two remaining Windows issues: 1) Auto-update on Windows. I finally found a good free MSI packager that is good enough, but I will need to test. I will also need /...\ figure out the update dance. On OSX and Linux the app can download the update, verify it against the list of authorized update signing certs, and then exec() the update in place. On Windows the service has to execute some kind of intermediate, die, and then the intermediate /...\ update and then start the servi ce again. Annoying... more moving parts, more to fail. 2) The Windows version takes care of automatically installing instances of the tap driver, which is a fork of the OpenVPN tap-windows driver with some extra ioctls that I added to support
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-06 08:53:52
would be hard, for instance, for me to jump from gmail to yahoo because my identity is stuck @gmail. I'd have to update my online accounts and call up my friends. But maybe I prefer yahoo's interface? Well, tough luck. That's about the reason why I call /...\ wrote: Am 04.09.2014 19:45, schrieb Paul Frazee: Got one question here: this seems to replicate data.  Does it protect against malicious updates too? It creates a verifiable log only -- the content of the messages is an application concern. We're looking at CRDTs to deal with convergence /...\ like an agreement on top to establish trust"?  (Though once I have that agreement, reconciliation is relevant only for nodes which missed the update itself.) After you've distributed identities, you need to distribute data-structures as well, This would be the easy part. Exactly. Identity is the unsolved
Michael Rogers [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Status reports - where are you with your work? 2014-05-02 16:18:26
ZeroTier One - https://www.zerotier.com/ > > Status: beta, pretty stable though one big change is still coming, > binary releases with auto-update in the wild and working well. > > Latest milestone: bug fixes, TCP tunneling for use behind tough > firewalls. > > In development: new web site /...\ including a few > businesses using it "for real," no major bugs reported for over a > month, so far auto-update system is secure and works flawlessly. > > On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com > <mailto:pfrazee@gmail.com /...\ wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I thought it'd be fun to hear status updates on people's >> projects. > That'll give everyone a chance to hear again about projects they > might not know about or had lost track
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Status reports - where are you with your work? 2014-04-25 10:51:26
Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote: ZeroTier One - https://www.zerotier.com/ Status: beta, pretty stable though one big change is still coming, binary releases with auto-update in the wild and working well. Latest milestone: bug fixes, TCP tunneling for use behind tough firewalls. In development: new web site that is less /...\ hundred regular users so far including a few businesses using it "for real," no major bugs reported for over a month, so far auto-update system is secure and works flawlessly. On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote /...\ thought it'd be fun to hear status updates on people's projects. That'll give everyone a chance to hear again about projects they might not know about or had lost track of. > > Just a quick breakdown: what's the project, what's the latest milestone, what
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Status reports - where are you with your work? 2014-04-25 08:03:32
ZeroTier One - https://www.zerotier.com/ Status: beta, pretty stable though one big change is still coming, binary releases with auto-update in the wild and working well. Latest milestone: bug fixes, TCP tunneling for use behind tough firewalls. In development: new web site that is less ugly & easier /...\ users so far including a few businesses using it "for real," no major bugs reported for over a month, so far auto-update system is secure and works flawlessly. On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com> wrote /...\ thought it'd be fun to hear status updates on people's projects. That'll give everyone a chance to hear again about projects they might not know about or had lost track of. > > Just a quick breakdown: what's the project, what's the latest milestone, what
Thomas Levine [GG] Distributed Dance Party update 2018-06-18 23:34:00
DECENTRALIZATION IS LIFE   Wow.       Almost a year since the last mailing list update!       It's been an incredibly hectic 11 months and sadly there's no time do it   all justice right /...\ Unconditional Love,   Tom, Gary and An International Cast Of Colorful Characters   P.S. GMAIL RECENTLY UPDATED, CAUSING OUR EMAILS TO BE FILTERED INTO THE   EASILY-MISSED "PROMOTIONS" TAB (INSTEAD OF YOUR PRIMARY INBOX). PLEASE   CLICK HERE TO LEARN HOW TO EASILY FIX THIS /...\ expressed unconditional love for the DDP.       by MailChimp    unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences * ------- End of Forwarded Message Here are some of the referenced webpages  2. [5f64bd4a-e6eb-4f88-a5a4-2b535be19edd]     https://theddp.us5.list-manage.com
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-05 13:59:28
would be hard, for instance, for me to jump from gmail to yahoo because my identity is stuck @gmail. I'd have to update my online accounts and call up my friends. But maybe I prefer yahoo's interface? Well, tough luck. So the solution is RSA keypairs. If users /...\ wrote: Am 04.09.2014 19:45, schrieb Paul Frazee: Got one question here: this seems to replicate data.  Does it protect against malicious updates too? It creates a verifiable log only -- the content of the messages is an application concern. We're looking at CRDTs to deal with convergence /...\ agreement on top to establish trust"?  (Though once I have that agreement, reconciliation is relevant only for nodes which missed the update itself.) After you've distributed identities, you need to distribute data-structures as well, This would be the easy part. Exactly. Identity is the unsolved problem
Feross Aboukhadijeh [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-31 17:54:38
does not allow you to open arbitrary TCP or UDP sockets, which is what I think you're asking. Existing torrent clients will need updating -- at least, that is the plan. Feross ✩  blog | ✎  studynotes | ✼  peercdn /...\ this... Can WebRTC Data Channels natively speak arbitary protocols, so they can just implement the regular BitTorrent protocol? Or will existing BitTorrent clients need updating? Francis On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:31:00PM -0800, Feross Aboukhadijeh wrote: > Hey everyone! I think Redecentralize is awesome
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Applying User-Agent Behaviors in Web Applications to Enable Runtime Extension 2014-03-10 14:51:13
Instead of those servers, caches cooperate. A group of "cache" nodes execute what traditional web apps do at the server. However updates are coordinated among those nodes assigned to the app: they are only executed if the majority of assigned nodes agrees. That is all those nodes always /...\ being only the protocol level - just goes so far to say: (a) an app might have local state, the implementation is responsible to apply updates requested by the application (after having run the agreement protocol) and (b) no app shall be able modify other app's state or even
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Applying User-Agent Behaviors in Web Applications to Enable Runtime Extension 2014-03-10 11:51:10
Instead of those servers, caches cooperate.  A group of "cache" nodes execute what traditional web apps do at the server. However updates are coordinated among those nodes assigned to the app: they are only executed if the majority of assigned nodes agrees.  That is all those /...\ being only the protocol level - just goes so far to say: (a) an app might have local state, the implementation is responsible to apply updates requested by the application (after having run the agreement protocol) and (b) no app shall be able modify other app's state or even
Ira [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Any updates on the un-conference? 2015-09-15 09:57:54
happening! The dates aren't changing :) Planning to release tickets this week, depending on who is around to help get that updated and up. We have a venue, which should be awesome. Nick is helping with the process for the program, but essentially want to get something on the site /...\ hellekin < hellekin@gnu.org > wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 09/14/2015 08:32 AM, Benjamin Heitmann wrote: > > are there any updates on the date and format of the un-conference? > I already have a train going to London on the 16th and leaving
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-03 11:31:11
need some kind of byzantine (Paxos alike) protocol, which is capable to convey hash verifying agreement on the proposed update.  (This is slightly more than most paxos implementations provide, since those are for some reason beyond me, designed to TRUST the origin of an update.)  Fortunately we have
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-04 12:45:35
just a well-known example. Got one question here: this seems to replicate data.  Does it protect against malicious updates too? It creates a verifiable log only -- the content of the messages is an application concern. We're looking at CRDTs to deal with convergence, but the systemic /...\ project, > https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt . > > Got one question here: this seems to replicate data.  Does it protect against malicious updates too? To illustrate: I'm currently working on some simple payment system. (I picked "payment system" because that's something everyone understands without explanation
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-05 14:13:39
schrieb Paul Frazee: Got one question here: this seems to replicate data.  Does it protect against malicious updates too? It creates a verifiable log only -- the content of the messages is an application concern. We're looking at CRDTs to deal with convergence, but the systemic model for security /...\ like an agreement on top to establish trust"?  (Though once I have that agreement, reconciliation is relevant only for nodes which missed the update itself.) After you've distributed identities, you need to distribute data-structures as well, This would be the easy part. Exactly. Identity is the unsolved
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: Sync/backup session was Re: [redecentralize] RDC 15 2015-10-16 11:31:17
easy as anywhere else. Advantages: per-object set of replica (full replication to each side, unlike e.g. Tahoe), 2/3rd-majority of those replica required to update objects (byzantine fault tolerant agreement, no SPOF), easy (typically used via webbrowser), fast if compared to say Ethereum (ca. 2 updates per second per object
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 01:16:33
surveillance/privacy issues. Recently, I had an AP reporter ask me if he could get in on these private emails when the FISA Court updates. I offered to do so, on the condition that he cite @FISACourt. That was a dealbreaker for him, which, whatever, but I earnestly encouraged
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-06 08:34:56
question here: this seems to replicate data. Does it protect >> against malicious updates too? >> >> To illustrate: I'm currently working on some simple payment system. (I >> picked "payment system" because that's something everyone understands >> without explanation
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralization on Wikipedia 2013-12-13 23:15:34
added > a brief section to the Wikipedia page on decentralization. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization#Centralization_and_redecentralization_of_the_Internet > > I'll try to update as there's more coverage, until the movement gathers > such unstoppable momentum it needs to be broken out into its own page. > > Are there
Louise Ishka [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-03 08:38:06
Recently, I had an AP reporter ask me if he could get in on these >>  private emails when the FISA Court updates. I offered to do so, >> on the condition that he cite @FISACourt. That was a dealbreaker >> for him, which, whatever
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-09 11:30:40
devices you do not have in your physical control. Same here. Up to not trusting any single device outside your trust set with the update process. > > I think this will be enough to implement "web 2.0" style "social" > applications such as twitter
Anish Mangal [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 21:02:50
helpful.  The Argentinian chapter for what I know is an exclusive club of merchants who don't even take the time to update their website nor respond to email.  But they still claim to be a local chapter of ISOC, and there's no official ISOC
Jonathan Deamer [LibreList] Redecentralization on Wikipedia 2013-12-13 20:06:23
www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/pods - nice work, Irina!), I've added a brief section to the Wikipedia page on decentralization. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization#Centralization_and_redecentralization_of_the_Internet I'll try to update as there's more coverage, until the movement gathers such unstoppable momentum it needs to be broken out into its own page. Are there
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-02 17:46:44
code validation checks of the centrally available code using a proof of validity stored in the Namecoin blockchain. And in the future, delivering code updates via the Avatar network itself. Really interested to see how this works out. Any opinions? [1] http://avatar.ai [2] http://sneakpeek.avatar.ai/technology.html [3] http://www.matasano.com
Benjamin Heitmann [LibreList] Any updates on the un-conference? 2015-09-14 12:32:33
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Status reports - where are you with your work? 2014-04-25 09:45:30
thought it'd be fun to hear status updates on people's projects. That'll give everyone a chance to hear again about projects they might not know about or had lost track of. Just a quick breakdown: what's the project, what's the latest milestone, what
fauno [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Any updates on the un-conference? 2015-09-15 11:20:52
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-02 12:20:44
code validation checks of the centrally available code using a proof of validity stored in the Namecoin blockchain. And in the future, delivering code updates via the Avatar network itself. Really interested to see how this works out. Any opinions? [1] http://avatar.ai [2] http://sneakpeek.avatar.ai/technology.html [3] http://www.matasano.com
Pierre Ozoux [GG] Re: So centralized! 2016-04-07 09:58:00
offer FLOSSaaS, so we take care of updates and backups. @Adrien, you have a hosting business? Would you like to put it here? https://github.com/indiehosters/nice-hosting-providers Danke! Pierre
Jacob Cook [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Status reports - where are you with your work? 2014-04-25 17:54:13
peakwinter.net On 25/04/14 10:45 AM, Paul Frazee wrote: > Hey all, > > I thought it'd be fun to hear status updates on people's projects. > That'll give everyone a chance to hear again about projects they might > not know about or had lost track
Ross Jones [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Ideas from London meetup 2013-12-19 10:41:46
site (whether labelled redecentralize or not) as part of a ‘Get Involved’ page. If you wanted to update the wiki page for Paris with any info (even if just contact details) then that would be fantastic. Ross
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 17:36:01
helpful. The Argentinian chapter for what I know is an > exclusive club of merchants who don't even take the time to update their > website nor respond to email. But they still claim to be a local > chapter of ISOC, and there's no official ISOC response
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] FireChat in Economist 2014-06-04 10:32:38
server itself?      It doesn't verify the this code is unmodified.  Why should it?  How would one ever update? b) The dynamically code loaded MAY be (usually is) the output of the network itself.      So it's actually verified against
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-02 12:47:06
value store with PUT and GET. Each key has a corresponding public key submitted with it that can be used to authorize future updates of the same key. Keys expire after one year. That's it. Or could we go even more minimal than that? In Turing-completeness there
Jacob Cook [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 19:00:50
Recently, I had an AP reporter ask me if he could get in on these >> private emails when the FISA Court updates. I offered to do so, >> on the condition that he cite @FISACourt. That was a dealbreaker >> for him, which, whatever
Ira [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] ZeroTier now has seed funding 2015-04-02 19:03:43
what is possible, how someone has benefited that I might identify with. Best of luck, keep up the good work and keep us updated! Ira On 1 April 2015 at 02:15, Paul Frazee < pfrazee@gmail.com > wrote: Congrats on the funding Paul
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-04 16:04:39
usable. How about allowing some kind of hashbang syntax in the script > to pull the language of users choice to execute the update? I agree... I just furnished it as an example to show that the complexity *floor* for systems like this can be pretty low. Usually the practical
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Hello from WebTorrent 2013-12-30 12:09:19
this... Can WebRTC Data Channels natively speak arbitary protocols, so they can just implement the regular BitTorrent protocol? Or will existing BitTorrent clients need updating? Francis On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:31:00PM -0800, Feross Aboukhadijeh wrote: > Hey everyone! I think Redecentralize is awesome – glad that
Francis Irving [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralization on Wikipedia 2013-12-15 11:58:55
added > a brief section to the Wikipedia page on decentralization. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization#Centralization_and_redecentralization_of_the_Internet > > I'll try to update as there's more coverage, until the movement gathers > such unstoppable momentum it needs to be broken out into its own page. > > Are there
Adam Ierymenko [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization: "I want to believe." 2014-08-19 12:22:38
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1:30 AM, David Geib < trustiosity.zrm@gmail.com > wrote: It
Christian de Larrinaga [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 18:26:32
Argentinian chapter for what I know > is an > > exclusive club of merchants who don't even take the time to update > their > > website nor respond to email. But they still claim to be a local > > chapter of ISOC, and there
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-04 15:07:09
just not good enough. It leaks information, is expensive and slow. I don't want to wait a minute for the website to update. And I want to run my copy locally on really small devices. That's why we need more fine grained control than a single blockchain
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-04 15:45:37
Dominic's project, > https://github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt. > > Got one question here: this seems to replicate data. Does it protect against malicious updates too? To illustrate: I'm currently working on some simple payment system. (I picked "payment system" because that's something everyone understands without explanation
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 11:17:34
helpful. The Argentinian chapter for what I know is an exclusive club of merchants who don't even take the time to update their website nor respond to email. But they still claim to be a local chapter of ISOC, and there's no official ISOC response trying to unlock
hellekin [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Any updates on the un-conference? 2015-09-14 11:24:22
BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 09/14/2015 08:32 AM, Benjamin Heitmann wrote: > > are there any updates on the date and format of the un-conference? > I already have a train going to London on the 16th and leaving on the 19th. So I hope
Dominic Tarr [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Thoughts on decentralization and deperimeterization 2014-09-05 06:51:59
github.com/dominictarr/secure-scuttlebutt. >> >> > > Got one question here: this seems to replicate data. Does it protect > against malicious updates too? > > To illustrate: I'm currently working on some simple payment system. (I > picked "payment system" because that's something everyone
Ira [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Redecentralization on Wikipedia 2013-12-14 22:14:43
added > a brief section to the Wikipedia page on decentralization. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization#Centralization_and_redecentralization_of_the_Internet > > I'll try to update as there's more coverage, until the movement gathers > such unstoppable momentum it needs to be broken out into its own page. > > Are there
Benjamin ANDRE [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-05 16:13:36
reporter ask me if he could get in on these >>  private emails when the FISA Court updates. I offered to do so, >> on the condition that he cite @FISACourt. That was a dealbreaker >> for him, which, whatever, but I earnestly encouraged
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Introduction 2014-01-06 13:53:30
Thanks for answering my questions. I'll keep an eye out for updates from you guys. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Adam Ierymenko < adam.ierymenko@zerotier.com > wrote: It's a bit of a grey area, but I really don't think
Eric Mill [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 21:58:22
reporter ask me if he could get in on these >>  private emails when the FISA Court updates. I offered to do so, >> on the condition that he cite @FISACourt. That was a dealbreaker >> for him, which, whatever, but I earnestly encouraged
Anish Mangal [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] The next billion. A broken web. Social implications. 2015-09-17 22:29:01
Argentinian chapter for what I know is an > exclusive club of merchants who don't even take the time to update their > website nor respond to email.  But they still claim to be a local > chapter of ISOC, and there's no official ISOC response
Jörg F. Wittenberger [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-03 09:53:54
code validation checks of the centrally available code using a proof of validity stored in the Namecoin blockchain. And in the future, delivering code updates via the Avatar network itself. Really interested to see how this works out. Any opinions? [1] http://avatar.ai [2] http://sneakpeek.avatar.ai/technology.html [3] http://www.matasano.com
Paul Frazee [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Avatar "operating system for the internet" 2014-02-03 11:04:28
code validation checks of the centrally available code using a proof of validity stored in the Namecoin blockchain. And in the future, delivering code updates via the Avatar network itself. Really interested to see how this works out. Any opinions? [1] http://avatar.ai [2] http://sneakpeek.avatar.ai/technology.html [3] http://www.matasano.com
maze@strahlungsfrei.de [LibreList] Re: [redecentralize] Intros and current projects 2014-01-02 23:56:09
Recently, I had an AP reporter ask me if he could get in on these > private emails when the FISA Court updates. I offered to do so, on > the condition that he cite @FISACourt. That was a dealbreaker for > him, which, whatever, but I earnestly encouraged